38.6c New Delhi, India, Wednesday, August 06, 2025
Top Stories Supreme Court
Political NEWS Legislative Corner Celebstreet International Videos
Subscribe Contact Us
close
Business

SEBI fines NDTV Promoters Prannoy Roy and Radhika Roy with Rs. 27 crores for violating regulatory norms [READ ORDER]

By Dev Kumar Patel      29 December, 2020 07:34 PM      0 Comments
SEBI fines NDTV Promoters Prannoy Roy and Radhika Roy with Rs. 27 crores for violating regulatory norms [READ ORDER]

The Securities and Exchange Board of India (SEBI) has imposed a penalty of Rs. 27 crores penalty on NDTV promoters Prannoy Roy, Radhika Roy and M/s RRPR Holding Pvt. Ltd for indulging in fraudulent and unfair practices relating to securities and failing to comply with various security norms.

The Securities and Exchange Board of India (SEBI) imposed the penalty of 25 crores under section 15HA of Securities and Exchange Board of India Act, 1992 on NDTV promoters Prannoy Roy, Radhika Roy and M/s RRPR  and penalty of Rs.1 crore each upon Prannoy Roy, Radhika Roy under section 23H of The Securities Contracts (Regulation) Act, 1956 .

The penalty was imposed SEBI  on receipt ofa complaint dated August 26, 2017 from Quantum Securities Pvt Ltd relating to the 3 loan agreements signed between Prannoy Roy, Radhika Roy and RRPR Holding Pvt. Ltd as one party and ICICI Bank Ltd as another party and between NDTV promoters and Vishvapradhan Commercial Private Limited (VCPL) as another party.

Accordingly, the SEBI conducted an investigation to ascertain whether there was any violation of the provisions of SEBI Act, 1992 and other regulations related to securities market. 

It was observed that a loan agreement dated July 21, 2009 was entered between VCPL and NDTV promoters wherein VCPL  extended a loan of Rs 350 crore to the promoters, subject to terms and conditions as mentioned in the said agreement. It was alleged that the loan agreement entered by the promoters with VCPL contained certain clauses related to NDTV which prima facie appeared to be material and price sensitive. The said loan agreement allegedly contained various restrictive clauses which were binding on NDTV in such a way that it could adversely affect the interests of public shareholders of NDTV.

Further, since the VCPL loan agreement was material and price sensitive in nature, it was submitted that the same ought to have been disclosed to NDTV by the promoters, who, in turn, should have disclosed the same to the stock exchanges. Since the information was not made public, it was alleged that the said information was concealed by the promoters from the public which amounted to committing fraud on the minority shareholders of the company.

Moreover, one of the terms of loan agreements allowed VCPL to indirectly acquire 30 per cent shareholding of NDTV through conversion of warrants into equity shares of RRPR Holding.

The promoters, on the other hand, contented NDTV was not a party and hence there was no requirement for the promoters to make disclosure of the agreements to the stock exchange.

SEBI, however, found that certain loan agreements had clauses that had adversarial effect on NDTV shareholders. Accordingly, the fine was imposed on the NDTV promoters and RRPR Holding Pvt Ltd.

In a statement, NDTV said that the founders lawyers will appeal against order and its baseless findings at the Securities Appellate Tribunal. 

SEBI Adjudicating Officer Amit Pradhan in its 52 page order opined that I am of the firm opinion that, any fraudulent act directly designed to defraud the investors of the company cannot be treated as good for the securities market and for the interest of investors, 

He further added that The law does not permit any allowance to be made for such fraudulent act as found in the case. No lenient view should be taken in this matter and the case deserves imposition of deterrent monetary penalty...

Last month, SEBI had barred Prannoy Roy and Radhika Roy from accessing the securities market for two years for alleged violation of insider trading regulations. It directed the NDTV promoters to relinquish illegal gains worth over Rs 16 crore for their in involvement in insider trading.

In June 2019, the regulator had barred the three promoters from the capital markets for two years and also restrained Roys from holding any board or top management role at the company in this period in the same case.

 

[READ ORDER]



Share this article:



Leave a feedback about this
TRENDING NEWS

sc-to-hear-plea-on-august-8-seeking-time-bound-restoration-of-statehood-to-jammu-and-kashmir
Trending Judiciary
SC to Hear Plea on August 8 Seeking Time-Bound Restoration of Statehood to Jammu & Kashmir

SC to hear plea on Aug 8 seeking time-bound restoration of statehood to J&K, citing violation of federalism and delay despite govt assurance.

05 August, 2025 01:45 PM
sc-cancels-bail-of-ex-dhfl-promoter-dheeraj-wadhawan-in-42000-crore-bank-fraud-case
Trending Judiciary
SC Cancels Bail of Ex-DHFL Promoter Dheeraj Wadhawan in ₹42,000 Crore Bank Fraud Case

SC cancels bail of ex-DHFL promoter Dheeraj Wadhawan in ₹42,000 cr bank loan scam case; directs him to surrender within 2 weeks despite medical plea.

05 August, 2025 05:34 PM

TOP STORIES

sc-directs-telangana-speaker-to-decide-disqualification-petitions
Trending Judiciary
SC directs Telangana Speaker to decide disqualification petitions against 10 rebel BRS MLAs within 3 months [Read Order]

SC orders Telangana Speaker to decide disqualification pleas against 10 rebel BRS MLAs within 3 months, stressing swift action on political defections.

31 July, 2025 04:58 PM
sc-to-first-consider-maintainability-of-review-against-2022-judgment-on-eds-powers-under-pmla
Trending Judiciary
SC to first consider maintainability of review against 2022 judgment on ED's powers under PMLA

SC to first decide if review pleas on ED powers under PMLA are maintainable; hearing on Karti Chidambaram’s plea set for August 6.

01 August, 2025 10:58 AM
sc-recalls-may-2-judgment-scrapping-jsw-steels-resolution-plan-for-bhushan-power-and-steel-ltd
Trending Business
SC recalls May 2 judgment scrapping JSW Steel's resolution plan for Bhushan Power and Steel Ltd

SC recalls its May 2 verdict cancelling JSW Steel’s ₹19,300 Cr resolution plan for Bhushan Power; matter to be heard afresh on August 7.

01 August, 2025 11:13 AM
electronic-communication-not-valid-mode-of-service-of-notice-under-section-35-bnss-sc
Trending Judiciary
Electronic communication not valid mode of service of notice under Section 35 BNSS: SC [Read Order]

SC holds WhatsApp or email not valid for notice under Section 35 BNSS due to arrest risk; personal service required to safeguard liberty.

01 August, 2025 11:25 AM

ADVERTISEMENT


Join Group

Signup for Our Newsletter

Get Exclusive access to members only content by email