38.6c New Delhi, India, Tuesday, November 04, 2025
Top Stories Supreme Court
Political NEWS Legislative Corner Celebstreet International Videos
Subscribe Contact Us
close
Business

Serum Institute of India files Rs. 100 crore Defamation Case After Volunteer Claims of Falling Sick Due to Vaccine Trial

By DEV KUMAR PATEL      30 November, 2020 06:54 PM      0 Comments
Serum Institute Defamation Case Covid

The Serum Institute of India on Sunday (November 20, 2020) filed a Rs. 100 crore defamation suit against a Chennai-based volunteer who took part in their COVID-19 vaccine trial and alleged that it triggered an adverse reaction and suffer a neurological breakdown after taking a dose.

Serum Institute has partnered with drug manufacturer Astra Zeneca and the University of Oxford to produce the Covishield vaccine in the country. The vaccine is seen as a possible option for many developing countries because of its cheaper price and ability to be transported and stored at normal temperatures.

The volunteer aged 40 years sought Rs. 5 crores from Serum Institute citing side effects of virtual neurological breakdown and impairment of cognitive functions after taking the dose of the Covid shot. However, the Serum Institute denied the allegations and called them malicious and misconceived. 

He also sent a legal notice to ICMR, DCGI, AstraZeneca, and Oxford University to stop testing, manufacturing, and distributing vaccines. In the legal notice, he claims that he experienced headaches and then endured a seven-day stay in the intensive care unit (ICU).

We havent received any response from any of the parties to whom we have sent the notice. We will be left with no other option but to go ahead and file a writ petition and get ready for a legal battle, advocate R. Rajaram, on behalf of the Volunteer said.

In a statement, a Serum Institute spokesperson said that while it sympathized with the volunteer's medical condition there was "absolutely no correlation with the vaccine trial and the medical condition of the volunteer"

Further, it is added that, The claim is malicious because the volunteer was specifically informed by the medical team that the complications he suffered were independent of the vaccine trial he underwent, the statement said. The volunteer is falsely laying the blame for his medical problems on the Covid vaccine trial. In spite of specifically being made aware of the same, he still chose to go public and malign the reputation of the company.

"It is evident that the intention behind the spreading of such malicious information is an oblique pecuniary motive. The Serum Institute of India will seek damages in excess of 100 crores for the same and will defend such malicious claims," Serum Institute said. 

As per experts, Serum Institute is performing bad moves as they initiated a Counter defamation suit against the Volunteer. 

Bioethics expert Professor Anant Bhan reacted on Twitter saying that the move on Serum Institutes part is to browbeat the volunteer. "A bad move by Serum to counter-sue. Volunteers participate in studies mostly out for altruistic reasons. In this case, healthy volunteers. If there is an issue about the serious adverse event (SAE), better to engage with the participant to understand their concerns. Rather than try to browbeat them," he said.

The All India Drug Action Network (AIDAN) also added by saying that "This ( the defamation suit) is a blatant attempt of intimidation.



Share this article:



Leave a feedback about this
TRENDING NEWS

no-law-student-shall-be-barred-from-exams-or-academic-progression-due-to-attendane-shortage-delhi-hc
Trending Judiciary
No Law Student Shall Be Barred From Exams Or Academic Progression Due To Attendane Shortage: Delhi HC [Read Judgment]

Delhi HC rules no law student can be barred from exams or academic progress for low attendance; directs BCI to rethink attendance norms and strengthen grievance systems.

03 November, 2025 04:03 PM
mere-refusal-to-marry-does-not-constitute-instigation-under-section-306-ipc-supreme-court
Trending Judiciary
Mere Refusal To Marry Does Not Constitute Instigation Under Section 306 IPC: Supreme Court [Read Order]

Mere refusal to marry does not amount to instigation under Section 306 IPC, rules Supreme Court, quashing FIR and holding no abetment in emotional distress cases.

03 November, 2025 04:15 PM

TOP STORIES

lawyers-to-stop-arguing-when-court-indicates-its-mind-sc
Trending Judiciary
Lawyers to stop arguing when court indicates its mind: SC [Read Judgment]

SC: Lawyers must stop arguing once court indicates its mind, stressing that harmony between Bench and Bar ensures dignified court functioning.

29 October, 2025 04:25 PM
wangchuks-detention-order-suffers-from-gross-illegality-and-arbitrariness-activists-wife-tells-sc
Trending Judiciary
Wangchuk's detention order suffers from gross illegality and arbitrariness, activist's wife tells SC

Wife of activist Sonam Wangchuk tells SC his detention under NSA suffers from illegality, citing stale FIRs, procedural lapses, and denial of fair representation.

29 October, 2025 04:35 PM
police-can-register-fir-for-threatening-witness-courts-complaint-not-needed-sc
Trending Judiciary
Police can register FIR for threatening witness; court's complaint not needed: SC [Read Judgment]

SC says police can directly file FIR for witness threats under Section 195A IPC; no court complaint needed as it’s a cognisable offence.

29 October, 2025 04:44 PM
sc-hints-at-pan-india-guidelines-on-timeline-to-frame-charges
Trending Judiciary
SC hints at pan-India guidelines on timeline to frame charges

SC mulls pan-India guidelines to curb delays in framing charges; notes cases where charges aren’t framed even after years despite BNSS mandate of 60 days.

30 October, 2025 12:22 PM

ADVERTISEMENT


Join Group

Signup for Our Newsletter

Get Exclusive access to members only content by email