38.6c New Delhi, India, Tuesday, February 10, 2026
Top Stories Supreme Court
Political NEWS Legislative Corner Celebstreet International Videos
Subscribe Contact Us
close
Business

Amazon Gets Interim Relief as Singapore Arbitration Court Pauses Future-RIL Deal

By Richa Shah      26 October, 2020 01:12 PM      0 Comments
Singapore arbitration court Amazon

On Sunday (25th October 2020), Amazon secured interim relief in a Singapore arbitration court, stalling partner Future Groups plan to sell its retail and wholesale assets to a unit of rival Reliance Industries Ltd for Rs.24,713 crore.

The USA based e-commerce giant Amazon claimed that Future Group had violated an investment contract it had agreed to sell its retail assets to Reliance Retail Ventures Ltd (RRVL) which was clearly against the contract.

This case was heard by a single judge bench consisting of Justice V.K.Rajah. Future Retail was barred by the court from taking any step to dispose of or encumber its assets or issuing any securities to secure any funding from a restricted party. In the order by the court, Justice V.K.Rajah said that the parties will have to wait for further orders from the tribunal when constituted. 

The court order stated the following:

 The majority respondents (Future Group) have asserted that the horse has bolted and that, consequently, the claimant no longer has any legitimate interests meriting protection. This is incorrect. The horse has not bolted, even though the respondents have opened the stable door. Even assuming that the horse has bolted, it is apparent that the respondents are contractually obliged to work with the claimant to cajole the unruly horse to return to its stable."

This court order gives Amazon a relief as a Future-Reliance deal could impose serious competition to the online retailer and Amazon who has a strong online presence has been trying for a long time to build its presence in the offline retail space to complement the successful online business.

A spokesperson from Amazon said, We welcome the award of the emergency arbitrator. We remain committed to an expeditious conclusion of the arbitration process.

Late Sunday (25th October 2020), Reliance Retail in a statement said that RRVL had entered into the transaction for the acquisition of assets and business of Future Retail Ltd under proper legal advice and the rights and obligations were fully enforceable under the Indian law. It also added that RRVL intended to enforce its rights and complete the transaction in terms of the scheme and agreement with the Future group as soon as possible without any delay.

However, a senior advocate from the Supreme Court said that it would be difficult for Future Group to successfully challenge the order given by the court.

On 29th August 2020, RRVL stated that it would acquire retail, wholesale, logistics, and warehousing businesses of the Future Group. This deal would include 1,800 stores of the Future Group that are spread across 420 cities in the country.

Amazon holds a 49% stake in Future Coupons Pvt. Ltd, which gives it a minority stake in Future Retail. Amazon cannot take more than a 51% stake in a multi-brand retailer due to the limitations imposed on foreign direct investment. Multi-brand retail attracts wide concerns over its impact on small traders and businesses and is a sensitive issue in India.

It was reported that Amazon was open to help the Future Group bring in a new, financially strong partner or investors if the deal between Reliance Retail Ventures Ltd is called off.



Share this article:



Leave a feedback about this
TRENDING NEWS

resignation-on-medical-grounds-attracts-forfeiture-of-pension-service-madras-hc-full-bench
Trending Judiciary
Resignation on Medical Grounds Attracts Forfeiture of Pension Service: Madras HC Full Bench [Read Order]

Madras High Court Full Bench rules resignation on medical grounds leads to forfeiture of past service under Tamil Nadu Pension Rules, 1978.

09 February, 2026 12:16 PM
madras-hc-clarifies-section-37-of-ndps-act-not-applicable-to-acceptance-of-bond-for-appearance
Trending Judiciary
Madras HC Clarifies: Section 37 of NDPS Act Not Applicable to Acceptance of Bond for Appearance [Read Order]

Madras High Court says Section 37 NDPS Act doesn’t apply to acceptance of bond for appearance on summons, as it is distinct from grant of bail.

09 February, 2026 12:20 PM

TOP STORIES

sc-upholds-joint-insolvency-proceedings-against-interlinked-real-estate-companies
Trending Judiciary
SC Upholds Joint Insolvency Proceedings Against Interlinked Real Estate Companies [Read Judgment]

Supreme Court upholds joint insolvency proceedings against interlinked real estate companies, allowing a single IBC petition for linked projects.

04 February, 2026 11:38 AM
sc-holds-courts-can-extend-arbitrators-mandate-even-after-award-is-rendered-clarifies-scope-of-section-29a-of-arbitration-act
Trending Judiciary
SC Holds Courts Can Extend Arbitrator’s Mandate Even After Award Is Rendered, Clarifies Scope of Section 29A of Arbitration Act

Supreme Court rules courts can extend arbitrator’s mandate even after award, clarifying Section 29A of the Arbitration and Conciliation Act.

04 February, 2026 12:53 PM
if-you-cant-follow-our-constitution-leave-india-supreme-court-to-meta-whatsapp-on-privacy-policy
Trending Judiciary
If You Can’t Follow Our Constitution, Leave India: Supreme Court to Meta, WhatsApp on Privacy Policy

Supreme Court warns Meta and WhatsApp to follow India’s Constitution or leave, slams privacy policy and data sharing with Meta companies.

04 February, 2026 01:30 PM
sc-to-rule-on-trump-era-emergency-tariffs-as-broader-us-tariff-landscape-shifts
Trending Judiciary
SC to Rule on Trump-Era Emergency Tariffs as Broader U.S. Tariff Landscape Shifts

Supreme Court to review Trump-era emergency tariffs under IEEPA, a ruling that could reshape U.S. trade policy and impact global markets and importers.

04 February, 2026 01:37 PM

ADVERTISEMENT


Join Group

Signup for Our Newsletter

Get Exclusive access to members only content by email