38.6c New Delhi, India, Thursday, December 18, 2025
Top Stories Supreme Court
Political NEWS Legislative Corner Celebstreet International Videos
Subscribe Contact Us
close
Business

Supreme Court Stays Rs. 420 Cr Penalty Imposed By CCI On Hyundai [Read order]

By LawStreet News Network      19 November, 2018 12:00 AM      0 Comments
Supreme Court Stays Rs. 420 Cr Penalty Imposed By CCI On Hyundai [Read Order]

The Supreme Court on November 16, 2018, stayed a penalty of 420.26 crore imposed by the Competition Commission of India (CCI) on car manufacturer Hyundai Motor India Ltd for allegedly restricting the sale and supply of genuine spare parts of automobiles in open market.

A two-judge Bench of Justice A.M. Khanwilkar and Justice Deepak Gupta was hearing an appeal filed by Hyundai against the CCIs July 27, 2015, order.

The directions by CCI are extreme, vague, impractical and irreversible in nature. These directions, which include putting into place a system to ensure that independent repairers have access to spare parts, technical manuals and diagnostic tools, training for independent dealers, and standardization of spare parts, are disproportionate to the alleged contravention, the appeal stated.

Apart from Hyundai, CCI had also found Mahindra Reva Electric Vehicles Pvt. Ltd, a subsidiary of Mahindra and Mahindra Ltd, and Doshi Holding Pvt. Ltd-promoted Premier in violation of competition laws.

While Hyundai was penalized 2% of its annual turnover in India for 2009-10, 2010-11 and 2011-12, Reva and Premier were exempted from penalties.

The regulator had held that the three companies had abused their dominant position in the supply of spare parts and entered into agreements that adversely affected market competition.

Genuine spare parts of automobiles manufactured by these companies were not made available in the open market, which affected independent mechanics who compete with authorized service stations, the CCI order had said.

Moreover, the CCI had also said that the designs, specifications, drawings and technologies provided by Hyundai to its equipment suppliers would not be exempted under Section 3(5) of the Competition Act, 2002, which protects exclusive rights granted under intellectual property rights.



Share this article:

User Avatar
About:


Leave a feedback about this
TRENDING NEWS

madras-hc-invokes-ancient-rajadharma-and-kautilyas-arthashastra-govt-has-constitutional-duty-to-provide-legal-aid-to-indian-citizens-abroad
Trending Judiciary
Madras HC Invokes Ancient ‘Rajadharma’ and Kautilya’s Arthashastra: Govt Has Constitutional Duty to Provide Legal Aid to Indian Citizens Abroad [Read Order]

Madras High Court invokes Rajadharma and Arthashastra, holds India has a constitutional duty to provide legal aid to citizens facing disputes abroad.

17 December, 2025 06:25 PM
sc-flags-exploitation-of-deity-criticises-paid-special-pujas-at-bankey-bihari-temple
Trending Judiciary
SC Flags ‘Exploitation’ of Deity, Criticises Paid ‘Special Pujas’ at Bankey Bihari Temple

Supreme Court flags exploitation of deity, questions paid special pujas at Bankey Bihari Temple, citing inequality and violation of sacred resting hours.

17 December, 2025 06:36 PM

TOP STORIES

sc-orders-aiims-to-form-secondary-medical-board-to-evaluate-passive-euthanasia-for-man-in-vegetative-state-for-13-years
Trending Judiciary
SC Orders AIIMS to Form Secondary Medical Board to Evaluate Passive Euthanasia for Man in Vegetative State for 13 Years [Read Order]

Supreme Court directs AIIMS to form a Secondary Medical Board to assess passive euthanasia for a man in a vegetative state for 13 years.

13 December, 2025 06:00 PM
endless-compassion-not-permissible-sc-bars-claims-for-higher-post-after-compassionate-appointment
Trending Judiciary
‘Endless Compassion Not Permissible’: SC Bars Claims for Higher Post After Compassionate Appointment [Read Judgment]

Supreme Court rules that employees cannot seek higher posts after accepting compassionate appointment, calling such claims “endless compassion.”

13 December, 2025 06:54 PM
property-tax-appeal-only-tax-amount-payable-penal-interest-not-mandatory-kerala-hc
Trending Judiciary
Property Tax Appeal: Only Tax Amount Payable, Penal Interest Not Mandatory: Kerala HC [Read Judgment]

Kerala High Court rules that municipalities cannot insist on penal interest for entertaining tax appeals; only the tax amount under Section 509(11) is required.

13 December, 2025 07:09 PM
sc-expands-ambit-of-posh-act-restrictive-interpretation-would-undermine-remedial-intent
Trending Judiciary
SC Expands Ambit of POSH Act: “Restrictive Interpretation Would Undermine Remedial Intent” [Read Judgment]

Supreme Court rules ICC at aggrieved woman’s workplace has jurisdiction under POSH Act, rejecting restrictive interpretation and reinforcing women’s right to safety.

13 December, 2025 07:13 PM

ADVERTISEMENT


Join Group

Signup for Our Newsletter

Get Exclusive access to members only content by email