38.6c New Delhi, India, Monday, January 19, 2026
Top Stories Supreme Court
Political NEWS Legislative Corner Celebstreet International Videos
Subscribe Contact Us
close
Business

Tata Mistry Case: SC Stays NCLATs Order Rejecting RoCs Plea Seeking Modification

By LawStreet News Network      24 January, 2020 04:01 PM      0 Comments
Tata Mistry Case: SC Stays NCLATs Order Rejecting RoCs Plea Seeking Modification

The Supreme Court today (24 January, 2020) has stayed the  National Company Law Appellate Tribunals (NCLAT) order that dismissed a plea by the Registrar of Companies (RoC) seeking amendments to its 18 December, 2019 judgment in the Tata-Mistry dispute. It also issued a notice to Cyrus Mistry on RoCs plea and will hear the matter with the main appeal moved by Tata Sons.

On December 18, 2019, the tribunal had ruled in favor of reinstating Cyrus Mistry as the chairman of Tata Sons. Tata Sons emeritus Chairman, Ratan Tata had moved the SC against NCLATs order. In its plea, RoC - under the Corporate Affairs Ministry had sought to be impleaded as a party in the two petitions and deletion of words illegal and with the help of the RoC used by the NCLAT in its 172-page judgment.

Tata Sons Ltd. was initially a 'Private Company' but after insertion of Section 43A (1A) in the Companies Act, 1956 on the basis of average annual turnover, it assumed the character of a deemed 'Public Company' with effect from February 1, 1975, the order said.

The Tata-Mistry war has dragged on for long and has constantly been in the public eye. Prior to turning Tata Sons to a public company from a private one, the Registrar of Companies (RoC) will allow and take into consideration for the Apex Court's hearing on the National Company Law Appellate Tribunals (NCLAT) judgment. The Supreme Court had previously announced that it would hear on January 10 Tata Sons plea against the NCLATs decision to restore Cyrus Mistry as chairman of Tata Sons and three group companies.

After NCLAT's decision in December last year, Mistry said he will not go after the chairmanship of Tata Sons, Tata Consultancy Services (TCS), Tata Teleservices, or Tata Industries, but will be chasing a seat at table.

Author: Nandini Gandhi



Share this article:

User Avatar
About:


Leave a feedback about this
TRENDING NEWS


TOP STORIES

madras-hc-seeks-larger-bench-to-reconsider-bar-on-enrolment-of-law-graduates-with-pending-criminal-cases
Trending Judiciary
Madras HC Seeks Larger Bench To Reconsider Bar On Enrolment Of Law Graduates With Pending Criminal Cases [Read Order]

Madras High Court refers to larger bench to reconsider bar on enrolment of law graduates with pending criminal cases under Advocates Act.

15 January, 2026 05:28 PM
madras-hc-state-organizes-jallikattu-at-avaniyapuram-private-committees-cannot-claim-independent-right
Trending Judiciary
Madras HC: State Organizes Jallikattu at Avaniyapuram; Private Committees Cannot Claim Independent Right [Read Order]

Madras High Court rules that only the State can organize Jallikattu at Avaniyapuram; private committees have no independent right to conduct the event.

15 January, 2026 05:52 PM
sc-delivers-split-verdict-on-section-17a-of-prevention-of-corruption-act-refers-matter-to-larger-bench
Trending Judiciary
SC Delivers Split Verdict on Section 17A of Prevention of Corruption Act, Refers Matter to Larger Bench [Read Judgment]

Supreme Court delivers a split verdict on Section 17A of the Prevention of Corruption Act, with judges differing on its validity and referring the issue to a larger bench.

15 January, 2026 08:04 PM
daughter-in-law-widowed-after-father-in-laws-death-entitled-to-maintenance-from-his-estate-sc
Trending Judiciary
Daughter-in-Law Widowed After Father-in-Law’s Death Entitled to Maintenance from His Estate: SC [Read Judgment]

Supreme Court rules that a daughter-in-law widowed after her father-in-law’s death can claim maintenance from his estate under Hindu law.

15 January, 2026 09:03 PM

ADVERTISEMENT


Join Group

Signup for Our Newsletter

Get Exclusive access to members only content by email