38.6c New Delhi, India, Thursday, July 18, 2024

Not forcing users to accept new updates in privacy policy- WhatsApp to Delhi High Court

By Pariyal Gupta      17 May, 2021 06:36 PM      0 Comments
Not forcing users to accept new updates in privacy policy- WhatsApp to Delhi High Court

In an affidavit filed by the Facebook-owned company WhatsApp, it submitted that it is not forcing its users to accept the 2021 update in its privacy policy as it is not mandatory. This statement came in reply to a petition filed before the Delhi High Court which challenged WhatsApps 2021 privacy policy update as being violative of Article 21 of the Constitution as it does not provide its users with the option to opt-out of the policy.

WhatsApp stated that its users are given the liberty to either accept the 2021 policy update or to not do so and also have the option to opt-out and delete their account at any time. 

WhatsApp submitted that users were not previously given the option to opt-out of WhatsApp's privacy policies if they wanted to use the WhatsApp service.

The Facebook-owned company has averred in its affidavit that it is under no legal obligation to provide such opt-outs and further, the company doesn't have any obligation to provide its services to such users, who do not consent to their terms.

While stating that such practices are common for online platforms, the company submitted that it was explicitly asking the consent of its users by offering them the liberty to choose and control unlike other online platforms wherein the users consent is implied by their continued use of service. In that respect, the affidavit also emphasized the point that even though such policy practices were being followed by several other online platforms, yet the petitioners were singling out WhatsApp. 

The company denied the petitioners allegations of disparity with European users. WhatsApp submitted that the 2021policy update applies, subject to certain regional laws and rules, to all its users across the globe. The disparity in the policy applicable to users from the European Region is due to the different rules and obligations applicable in that Region. 

The company submitted that such interference in its privacy policy update would cripple the internet-based applications and website industry.

The affidavit urged the Delhi High Court to dismiss the petition challenging its privacy policy. Citing companies such as Google, Microsoft, Zoom, Truecaller, and others, the company pointed out other online platforms that have retained their right to collect their users data. 

Even though the Parliament has been deliberating over the Personal Data Protection Bill 2019 since January 2020, the Affidavit urged the High Court not to establish new data protection rights as the same would be contrary to the principle of judicial restraint.


A petition challenging the privacy policy of messaging app WhatsApp was filed before the Delhi High Court. The petition had been filed by one Dr. Seema Singh through Advocate Meghana and Advocate Vikram Singh, alleging that the WhatsApp privacy policy update of 2021 does not provide its users with an option to protect their data by opting out of their policy and hence is violative of the fundamental right to privacy under Article 21 of the Constitution. The petition sought directions to the Union of India to formulate Social Media Intermediary Guidelines for safeguarding the privacy of citizens. 

Earlier, responding to a Public Interest Litigation filed, the Delhi High Court had restrained WhatsApp from implementing its new terms of service and privacy policy, which were released on January 4, 2021, pending adjudication on the case by the court. 

Last week, a division bench of Chief Justice D.N Patel and Justice Jasmeet Singh issued notice to the Centre and social media platforms Facebook and WhatsApp seeking their response on a Public Interest Litigation (PIL) petition filed by one Harsha Gupta through Advocates Vivek Sood and Dhruv Gupta challenging the new privacy policy of WhatsApp. The petition challenges WhatsApps general terms of service and Business terms of service as being violative of Article 21 of the Constitution. 

Share this article:

Leave a feedback about this

Trending Know The Law
Zero FIR: Here’s all you need to know!

Understanding Zero FIR: Bharatiya Nyaya Sanhita Section 154 allows FIR at any police station. E-FIR under Section 173 ensures efficient crime reporting in India.

17 July, 2024 01:25 PM
Trending Judiciary
Judicial activist Ashwini Upadhyay asks SC to declare amendment to Preamble as unconstitutional

Judicial activist Ashwini Upadhyay petitions SC to declare the 42nd Amendment to the Preamble, which added "Socialist," "Secular," and "Integrity," as unconstitutional.

17 July, 2024 05:14 PM


Trending Judiciary
Bombay High Court denies interim relief in plea against 1 year Pan Masala Ban [Read Order]

Bombay High Court denies interim relief to petitioners challenging the 1-year ban on pan masala, citing arguable questions and ongoing similar cases.

12 July, 2024 10:00 AM
Trending Judiciary
SC Collegium recommends appointment of Chief Justices of eight High Courts [Read Order]

SC Collegium recommends appointments of Chief Justices for Delhi, Himachal Pradesh, J&K, Kerala, Madhya Pradesh, Madras, and Meghalaya High Courts.

12 July, 2024 10:55 AM
Trending Judiciary
SC orders interim bail for Kejriwal in ED case, refers issues on arrest to larger bench

SC grants interim bail to Kejriwal in ED case, refers arrest issues to larger bench; AAP leader remains in jail due to separate CBI arrest in liquor scam.

12 July, 2024 11:21 AM
Trending Judiciary
Hathras incident: SC refuses to consider PIL on inquiry, adequate compensation

Supreme Court declines PIL on Hathras stampede inquiry and compensation, directs petitioner to approach High Court for addressing the issue.

12 July, 2024 01:38 PM


Join Group

Signup for Our Newsletter

Get Exclusive access to members only content by email