38.6c New Delhi, India, Tuesday, January 13, 2026
Top Stories Supreme Court
Political NEWS Legislative Corner Celebstreet International Videos
Subscribe Contact Us
close
Business

VLCC To Pay Rs. 1 Lakh Compensation To Fat Loss Client For Negligence

By LawStreet News Network      22 January, 2020 11:01 PM      0 Comments
VLCC To Pay Rs. 1 Lakh Compensation To Fat Loss Client For Negligence

Well knows beauty clinic VLCC has been ordered to pay Rs. 1 lakh compensation to a fat loss client who had sustained second-degree burn injuries while undergoing a fat reduction treatment offered by them at their Kolkata clinic by the District Consumer Disputes Redressal Forum, Kolkata unit in the case of Anna Louise Correia v. VLCC Health Care LtdOrder to this effect has been given by Honble Mr. Swapan Kumar Mahanty, President, and other Honble members Mrs. Sahana Ahmed Basu and Mr. Ashoke Kumar Ganguly on January 14, 2020. 

Facts of the case are as following: 

The complainant in the case was influenced by the attractive packages advertised along with interviews of former clients on Social Media as well as daily newspapers thereby approaching VLCC, Kolkata unit for availing their services in order to reduce her body fat within a stipulated period of time. She had spent a total Rs. 5,13,879.72/- till the month of February, 2018 on various treatments, but had not got satisfactory results. She was assured in the beginning that the whole procedure will be conducted with the assistance of any medical expert and/ or doctor, but it was not the case, procedure was conducted by one staff member only. 

One day while undergoing the treatment, she was left totally shattered when she sustained pain on her right side of lower abdominal area. Ultimately, she has to contact a private doctor for treatment. Following which, she was unable to do her normal activities which caused her intolerable pain and mental depression. She approached the clinic for refund of the money due to non-satisfactory service on their part, but they didnt agree. Hence, she approached the consumer forum under the Consumer Protection Act, 1986.

The question that came before the forum for consideration was whether there was any negligence and deficiency in service on the part of the clinic during the treatment for which the complainant suffered loss and injury on her right side of lower abdominal area.

Interestingly, the complainant had signed a consent form prior to commencement of the treatment, and she was assured that the treatment which she is undergoing has no side effects, which was countered by VLCC by arguing that the result of treatment may vary from person to person and any post treatment adverse effect does not mean that they have done any wrong treatment in a negligent manner.

Findings of the Forum: 

It was found that there was negligence and deficiency in service on the part of VLCC as during the treatment, no expert was present and attendant who had given treatment to the complainant was also not highly skilled. Hence the forum concluded that the complainant is entitled to a refund of Rs. 2,00,069/-, the amount she had spent on the particular treatment, which caused side effects on her body, out of many treatments she had taken. While outlining the importance of awarding compensation bench reasoned that award of compensation of Rs. 1,00,000/- is reasonable or commensurate with the loss, injury, mental & physical pain and agony suffered by the complainant and it would adequately meet the ends of justice.

VLCC has been asked to pay the full amount ordered within 45 days of passing of the order. 

Author: Parth Thummar 



Share this article:

User Avatar
About:


Leave a feedback about this
TRENDING NEWS

ai-judges-the-future-of-algorithmic-decision-making-in-courts
Trending Vantage Points
“AI Judges” The Future of Algorithmic Decision-Making in Courts

Can algorithms deliver justice? This article explores AI judges, constitutional challenges, ethical risks, global models, and India’s cautious path forward.

12 January, 2026 07:07 PM

TOP STORIES

borrowers-cannot-invoke-writ-jurisdiction-to-compel-banks-to-extend-one-time-settlement-benefits-kerala-hc
Trending Judiciary
Borrowers Cannot Invoke Writ Jurisdiction to Compel Banks to Extend One-Time Settlement Benefits: Kerala HC [Read Judgment]

Kerala High Court holds borrowers cannot invoke writ jurisdiction to compel banks to grant One-Time Settlement benefits, as OTS is not a legal right.

07 January, 2026 09:22 PM
leela-palace-udaipur-ordered-to-pay-10-lakh-after-housekeeping-staff-enters-occupied-room-without-consent
Trending Business
Leela Palace Udaipur Ordered to Pay ₹10 Lakh After Housekeeping Staff Enters Occupied Room Without Consent [Read Order]

Chennai Consumer Commission orders Leela Palace Udaipur to pay ₹10 lakh and refund room tariff for breach of guest privacy by housekeeping staff.

07 January, 2026 09:43 PM
sc-strikes-down-bihars-midway-change-in-recruitment-rules-for-assistant-engineers
Trending Judiciary
SC Strikes Down Bihar’s Midway Change in Recruitment Rules for Assistant Engineers [Read Judgment]

Supreme Court rules recruitment criteria cannot be changed midway, strikes down Bihar’s retrospective amendment granting weightage to contractual engineers.

07 January, 2026 10:03 PM
only-light-and-not-any-fight-madras-hc-upholds-single-judges-order-allowing-lighting-of-lamps-on-deepathoon
Trending Judiciary
Only Light And Not Any Fight: Madras HC Upholds Single Judge’s Order Allowing Lighting Of Lamps On Deepathoon [Read Judgment]

Madras High Court upholds order allowing lighting of Karthigai Deepam at Deepathoon, rejecting public order objections and dismissing 20 appeals.

07 January, 2026 10:57 PM

ADVERTISEMENT


Join Group

Signup for Our Newsletter

Get Exclusive access to members only content by email