38.6c New Delhi, India, Friday, February 06, 2026
Top Stories Supreme Court
Political NEWS Legislative Corner Celebstreet International Videos
Subscribe Contact Us
close
Business

Xerox Launches $35B Hostile Takeover Bid For HP

By LAWSTREET NEWS NETWORK      05 March, 2020 07:03 AM      0 Comments
Xerox Launches $35B Hostile Takeover Bid For HP

Xerox Holdings Corp. has initiated a promising proposal for all outstanding shares of HP Inc., which gave a new boost to the battle regarding Xerox taking control over the Personal Computer making giant. This idea was given thought almost 10 months ago by the executives at Xerox.

The photocopying pioneer has made a proposal to the HP Investors on a Cash-and-Stock offer of $24 per share. If acted upon the proposal, for a single HP Share, the holder would get $18.40 in cash and 0.149 Xerox shares. The deadline to accept is to be set on 21st April, Xerox said on 2nd March, 2020, Monday in a statement.

The Norwalk, Connecticut-based photocopying pioneer has said by joining the companies $2 billion would be yielded in cost savings and over $1 billion would be obtained through having additional revenue growth. Technologies invented by both the Hardware oriented companies is still used in offices and consumers on a daily basis and have struggled their way in a world which is mainly driven by software

Though HPs board rejected the offer made by Xerox and termed it as to be undervaluing the Palo Alto, California-based company, and claimed that last week it will return $16 billion to shareholders as a sign to show that it can stand on its own. HP executives, however, said they will try and communicate with Xerox in order to reach a common ground regarding the terms of the proposal.

Our proposal offers progress over entrenchment," Xerox Chief Executive Officer John Visentin said in the statement. HP shareholders will receive $27 billion in immediate, upfront cash while retaining significant, long-term upside through equity ownership in a combined company with greater free cash flow to invest in growth and return to shareholders."

HP further added that it would review Xeroxs offer over 10 business days before suggesting the best course of action for the shareholders.

Xerox executives first acquired an acquisition of HP during May 2019, the company told in a regulatory filing. After owning a 4% stake in HP, Xeroxs largest shareholder, activist Carl Icahn, called Visentin and HPs then-CEO on 12 August to say that a merger between the two companies would create value.

Executives from Xerox and HP sat down on 12 September to talk about the proposal. HP officials indicated they had reservations about" a deal with Xerox because of obstructions that came with the Samsung print business which HP bought in 2017, including limitations on the fact that HP is conducting business in China and some classified restrictions which are contained in HPs agreements with Canon Inc. HP sent Xerox a long list of questions, including requests for information that Xerox found competitively sensitive".

Xerox wouldn't answer them without having a secrecy understanding and common due diligence. Xerox's board concluded administrators shouldn't participate in conversations with HP or open the organization's books except if the PC creator proposed an arrangement structure or gave Xerox access for due perseverance. Rather, the printing organization increased endeavours to assemble an idea to purchase HP, which it sent 5 November.

Xerox said it has secured financing from Citigroup Inc., Mizuho Financial Group Inc., Bank of America Corp., Mitsubishi UFJ Financial Group Inc., PNC Bank, Credit Agricole, Truist Financial Corp. and SunTrust Robinson Humphrey Inc. for the cash portion of the offer.

Author Devansh Dev



Share this article:

About:

Explore Comprehensive Legal Reporting with LawStreet Journal: Your Go-To Source for Supreme Court an...Read more

Follow:
TwitterLinkedinInstagram


Leave a feedback about this
TRENDING NEWS

karnataka-hc-quashes-disqualification-of-councillors-over-pre-election-auction-participation
Trending Judiciary
Karnataka HC Quashes Disqualification Of Councillors Over Pre-Election Auction Participation [Read Order]

Karnataka High Court quashes councillors’ disqualification over pre-election auction benefits, holds Section 26(1)(k) inapplicable.

05 February, 2026 11:29 AM
karnataka-hc-upholds-acquittal-in-pocso-case-cites-inconsistent-testimony-and-failure-to-prove-victims-age
Trending Judiciary
Karnataka HC Upholds Acquittal in POCSO Case, Cites Inconsistent Testimony and Failure to Prove Victim’s Age [Read Judgment]

Karnataka High Court upholds acquittal in a POCSO case, citing inconsistent testimony and failure to prove the victim’s age.

05 February, 2026 12:22 PM

TOP STORIES

bombay-hc-rules-adopted-child-with-unknown-parentage-inherits-caste-of-adoptive-parents
Trending Judiciary
Bombay HC Rules Adopted Child With Unknown Parentage Inherits Caste of Adoptive Parents [Read Judgment]

Bombay High Court held that an adopted child with unknown parentage acquires the caste of adoptive parents and is entitled to caste validity.

02 February, 2026 11:11 AM
ugc-regulations-on-vice-chancellor-selection-binding-state-law-deviation-illegal-sc
Trending Judiciary
UGC Regulations on Vice-Chancellor Selection Binding; State Law Deviation Illegal: SC [Read Judgment]

Supreme Court holds UGC Regulations on Vice-Chancellor selection binding, strikes down state law deviation, but allows incumbent to complete tenure under Article 142.

02 February, 2026 12:16 PM
bombay-hc-holds-section-9-cannot-be-used-to-fasten-liability-on-non-signatory-once-foreign-award-is-held-unenforceable
Trending Judiciary
Bombay HC Holds Section 9 Cannot Be Used to Fasten Liability on Non-Signatory Once Foreign Award Is Held Unenforceable [Read Judgment]

Bombay HC holds Section 9 cannot fasten liability on a non-signatory once a foreign arbitral award is held unenforceable against it.

02 February, 2026 12:21 PM
madras-hc-bans-construction-at-heritage-temples-across-tamil-nadu-until-heritage-commission-is-formed
Trending Judiciary
Madras HC Bans Construction at Heritage Temples Across Tamil Nadu Until Heritage Commission Is Formed [Read Order]

Madras High Court bans civil construction at heritage temples across Tamil Nadu until the State Heritage Commission is constituted and becomes functional.

02 February, 2026 12:38 PM

ADVERTISEMENT


Join Group

Signup for Our Newsletter

Get Exclusive access to members only content by email