38.6c New Delhi, India, Saturday, April 27, 2024
CelebStreet

Apex Court Rejects Plea Against Order Restricting Netflix From Using Subrata Roy's Name In Series ‘Bad Boy Billionaire’

By Rhea Banerjee      04 September, 2020 06:15 PM      0 Comments
APEX COURT REJECTS PLEA AGAINST ORDER RESTRICTING NETFLIX FROM USING SUBRATA ROY'S NAME IN SERIES  ‘Bad Boy Billionaire’

The Supreme Court has rejected the plea of Netflix on 2nd September, Wednesday where Netflix was challenging the court order of Bihar restraining it from using the name of Sahara Group chairman Subrata Roy in its upcoming series “Bad Boy Billionaires”. The web series is slated to release on 2nd September on the online platform of Netflix and the series is a fact-finding documentary about the ill-famed business frauds of India. 

The Bench comprised of Chief Justice SA Bobdeand also Justice Arun Mishra, Justice AS Bopana, and Justice V Ramasubramanian which states that any order of the lower court cannot be directly challenged in the Apex Court. 

The Bench directed Netflix to approach the Appellate Court and not the Supreme court for appeal as the matter was decided in the lower court of Bihar. Senior Advocate Mukul Rohatgi representing Netflix stated that there were numerous petitions pending in various High Courts relating to the web series and the Apex Court could transfer the cases to itself, so as to save the time. 

The Bench agreed to issue a notice on the separate petitions filed by Netflix asking for transfer of those cases to the Supreme Court from various High Courts. The advocate appearing for the Sahara Group, Vikas Singh was against the plea of Netflix and said that the order was passed by Civil Judge and thus the appeal should be made before a District Judge and not before the High Court or Supreme Court. 

The Local Court in Bihar’s Araria area passed a temporary stay on the airing of Netflix’s forthcoming web series “Bad Boy Billionaires” which has used the name of Subrata Roy in the Sahara scam. 

The plea was filed by Subrata Roy seeking a stay on the series accusing the malign intentions of the series in order to defame the public image of Subrata Roy by featuring him along with the other fugitive billionaires like Vijay Mallya, Nirav Modi, and Mehul Choksi. He also mentioned before the Local Court that if his name was used in the series, it would tarnish his image as well as have an adverse effect over the enterprise Sahara Group. 

Subrata Roy also claimed that before the London-based director had met him in Lucknow in 2019 and assured that the series would be made on his life and the title of the series would be “Billionaires”. 

The Diamantaire Mehul Choksi who was involved in the $2 billion PNB scam has also approached the High Court of Delhi demanding a pre-screening of the series which was adjourned for the next hearing on September 7, 2020. Earlier, the plea of Choksi was dismissed by the single bench, which had refused to grant him a preview of the show stating that they have no such regulations to have control over the OTT content and media services. The series is about the controversial cases of the infamous business tycoons. 



Share this article:



Leave a feedback about this
TRENDING NEWS

whatsapp-has-threatened-to-exit-india-if-asked-to-break-end-to-end-encryption
Trending Top Stories
WhatsApp has threatened to exit India if asked to “break end-to-end encryption”

WhatsApp has threatened to exit India if directed by law to break end-to-end encryption offered on its digital messaging platform.

26 April, 2024 12:36 PM
sc-notice-to-ec-to-declare-elections-as-void-if-nota-votes-higher-than-any-candidate
Trending Judiciary
SC notice to EC to declare elections as void if NOTA votes higher than any candidate

SC asks EC to consider voiding elections if NOTA votes exceed those for any candidate, aiming to enhance candidate quality.

26 April, 2024 04:18 PM

TOP STORIES

a-critique-of-the-supreme-courts-adventurism-for-lgbtqia-rights
Trending Legal Insiders
Overreaching Jurisdiction: A critique of the Supreme Court's adventurism for LGBTQIA rights

In its over-enthusiasm to protect LGBTQIA+ rights, has the Supreme Court exceeded its constitutional mandate under Article 142? A Delhi University research scholar evaluates the theme.

22 April, 2024 10:48 AM
new-criminal-laws-watershed-moment-for-society-cji
Trending Legal Insiders
New criminal laws watershed moment for society: CJI [Read Inaugural Remarks]

CJI Chandrachud hails new criminal laws as a watershed moment, marking a significant overhaul for the justice system, emphasizing adaptation and technology's role.

22 April, 2024 11:26 AM
sc-grants-permission-for-medical-termination-of-pregnancy-of-14-yr-old-rape-survivor
Trending Judiciary
SC grants permission for medical termination of pregnancy of 14-yr-old rape survivor

Supreme Court grants medical termination of pregnancy to 14-yr-old rape survivor after assessing adverse health impacts, setting aside Bombay HC's decision.

22 April, 2024 12:14 PM
criminal-accused-won-more-seats-in-17th-lok-sabha-amicus-curiae-report
Trending Legislative Corner
Criminal accused won more seats in 17th Lok Sabha: Amicus curiae report

Candidates with criminal cases won more seats in the 17th Lok Sabha than those who led lawful lives, an amicus curiae report in the Supreme Court said.

22 April, 2024 01:45 PM

ADVERTISEMENT


Join Group

Signup for Our Newsletter

Get Exclusive access to members only content by email