38.6c New Delhi, India, Tuesday, November 26, 2024
Top Stories Supreme Court
Political NEWS Legislative Corner Celebstreet International Videos
Subscribe Contact Us
close
CelebStreet

Apex Court Rejects Plea Against Order Restricting Netflix From Using Subrata Roy's Name In Series Bad Boy Billionaire

By Rhea Banerjee      04 September, 2020 06:15 PM      0 Comments
APEX COURT REJECTS PLEA AGAINST ORDER RESTRICTING NETFLIX FROM USING SUBRATA ROY'S NAME IN SERIES  Bad Boy Billionaire

The Supreme Court has rejected the plea of Netflix on 2nd September, Wednesday where Netflix was challenging the court order of Bihar restraining it from using the name of Sahara Group chairman Subrata Roy in its upcoming series Bad Boy Billionaires. The web series is slated to release on 2nd September on the online platform of Netflix and the series is a fact-finding documentary about the ill-famed business frauds of India. 

The Bench comprised of Chief Justice SA Bobdeand also Justice Arun Mishra, Justice AS Bopana, and Justice V Ramasubramanian which states that any order of the lower court cannot be directly challenged in the Apex Court. 

The Bench directed Netflix to approach the Appellate Court and not the Supreme court for appeal as the matter was decided in the lower court of Bihar. Senior Advocate Mukul Rohatgi representing Netflix stated that there were numerous petitions pending in various High Courts relating to the web series and the Apex Court could transfer the cases to itself, so as to save the time. 

The Bench agreed to issue a notice on the separate petitions filed by Netflix asking for transfer of those cases to the Supreme Court from various High Courts. The advocate appearing for the Sahara Group, Vikas Singh was against the plea of Netflix and said that the order was passed by Civil Judge and thus the appeal should be made before a District Judge and not before the High Court or Supreme Court. 

The Local Court in Bihars Araria area passed a temporary stay on the airing of Netflixs forthcoming web series Bad Boy Billionaires which has used the name of Subrata Roy in the Sahara scam. 

The plea was filed by Subrata Roy seeking a stay on the series accusing the malign intentions of the series in order to defame the public image of Subrata Roy by featuring him along with the other fugitive billionaires like Vijay Mallya, Nirav Modi, and Mehul Choksi. He also mentioned before the Local Court that if his name was used in the series, it would tarnish his image as well as have an adverse effect over the enterprise Sahara Group. 

Subrata Roy also claimed that before the London-based director had met him in Lucknow in 2019 and assured that the series would be made on his life and the title of the series would be Billionaires. 

The Diamantaire Mehul Choksi who was involved in the $2 billion PNB scam has also approached the High Court of Delhi demanding a pre-screening of the series which was adjourned for the next hearing on September 7, 2020. Earlier, the plea of Choksi was dismissed by the single bench, which had refused to grant him a preview of the show stating that they have no such regulations to have control over the OTT content and media services. The series is about the controversial cases of the infamous business tycoons. 



Share this article:



Leave a feedback about this
TRENDING NEWS

beant-singh-assassination-case-sc-grants-four-weeks-more-time-to-centre-to-decide-mercy-plea-of-death-row-convict
Trending Judiciary
Beant Singh assassination case: SC grants four weeks more time to Centre to decide mercy plea of death row convict

SC grants Centre 4 more weeks to decide mercy plea of death row convict Balwant Singh Rajoana in Beant Singh assassination case, citing sensitivities.

25 November, 2024 11:25 AM
hindu-women-right-to-maintenance-found-in-shastric-hindu-law-sc
Trending Judiciary
Hindu Women’s right to maintenance found in Shastric Hindu law: SC [Read Judgment]

SC: Hindu Women’s maintenance rights rooted in Shastric law, property given in lieu transforms into absolute ownership under Section 14(1) of HSA, 1956.

25 November, 2024 11:49 AM

TOP STORIES

no-disciplinary-proceedings-allowed-against-employee-after-retirement-sc
Trending Judiciary
No disciplinary proceedings allowed against employee after retirement: SC [Read Judgment]

SC rules disciplinary proceedings cannot start after employee’s retirement or extended service. SBI directed to release pending dues within six weeks.

20 November, 2024 03:47 PM
sc-restores-criminal-charges-against-kerala-mla-for-tampering-of-evidence-in-a-drug-case
Trending Judiciary
SC restores criminal charges against Kerala MLA for tampering of evidence in a drug case

SC revives criminal charges against Kerala MLA Antony Raju for tampering evidence in 1990 drug case; directs trial completion within a year.

20 November, 2024 04:02 PM
delhi-hc-directs-sbi-to-compensate-customer-in-cyber-fraud-case-emphasises-banks-responsibility-in-digital-security
Trending Judiciary
Delhi HC directs SBI to compensate customer in Cyber Fraud Case, emphasises bank’s responsibility in digital security [Read Judgment]

Delhi High Court directs SBI to compensate Rs. 2.60 lakh to a cyber fraud victim, emphasizing banks’ responsibility to ensure digital security and swift action.

20 November, 2024 04:06 PM
supreme-court-upholds-wifes-right-to-pre-divorce-living-standards-restores-rs-1-75-lakh-monthly-maintenance
Trending Judiciary
Supreme Court Upholds Wife’s Right to Pre-Divorce Living Standards, restores Rs. 1.75 lakh monthly maintenance [Read Judgment]

Supreme Court restores Rs 1.75 lakh monthly maintenance, emphasizing a wife’s right to maintain pre-divorce living standards in landmark judgment.

20 November, 2024 04:35 PM

ADVERTISEMENT


Join Group

Signup for Our Newsletter

Get Exclusive access to members only content by email