38.6c New Delhi, India, Thursday, April 18, 2024

Bombay HC Orders Businessman To Pay Rs. 2.5 Crores To Sussanne Khan, Upholds The Decision Of Arbitral Tribunal

By LawStreet News Network      08 February, 2020 12:02 AM      0 Comments
Bombay HC Orders Businessman To Pay Rs. 2.5 Crores To Sussanne Khan, Upholds The Decision Of Arbitral Tribunal

On February 5th, 2020 a bench comprising Chief Justice Pradeep Nandrajog and Justice Bharati Dangreordered the businessman to pay Rs. 2.5 crores to Sussanne Khan for breaching her ‘intellectual property right’. The court went with the decision of the Arbitral Tribunal and gave the verdict in favour of Khan.

The issue arises out of the agreement between socialite and Ex-wife of Hritike Roshan, Sussanne Khan and Mudit Gupta of EMGEE Properties, according to which Khan was appointed to create interior design for the businessman’s real estate project in Goa. It was agreed that she would be paid Rs. 6 crores in two instalments in return of her design for 12 villas.

They worked for some time and he paid her Rs. 1.68 crores but after this a dispute arose between them. It further increased when Khan came to know that Gupta was trying to implement her interior designs for the villas through another interior designer. Then Khan demanded the remaining fees claiming the breach of agreement from Gupta’s side as he used third party for the execution of her interior designs for the villas. She demanded Rs. 5 crores as her pending fees.

However, Gupta refused to pay the amount and accused her for the breach of agreement. He said that Khan delayed the submission of her designs which was against the terms of agreement.

After looking at all the aspects, Arbitrator Tribunal gave the decision in favour of Khan and ordered the businessman to pay the sum of 2.5 crores for using her intellectual property.

The businessman filed the petition against the decision in front of the bench led by CJ Nandrajog, which also upheld the decision of the arbitrator. Justice CJ Nandrajog said that “The Award rightly records that Khan was not to be blamed for the delay and the advantage could not have been derived on the pretext of delay in submission of designs and plans to deny the second phase of fees. In absence of proof being adduced, the Arbitrator has rightly refused to accept Gupta’s claim that the drawings were incomplete or unusable."

The bench further added that Khan was not in violation of the terms of agreement as she was not responsible for the delay in the execution of project.


Author- Aditi Dubey

Share this article:

User Avatar

Leave a feedback about this

Trending Judiciary
Burden to prove dishonest damage to electric meter is for electricity theft, is on the prosecution: Delhi HC [Read Judgment]

Delhi High Court has held that the burden to prove that a person has ‘dishonestly’ damaged an electric meter to commit electricity theft is on the prosecution.

17 April, 2024 05:41 PM


Trending Legal Insiders
Two-day conference on April 13-14 on Technology and Dialogue between SC and Singapore

Explore AI's role in law at the India-Singapore Supreme Court conference on technology, enhancing judicial processes and access to justice, April 13-14, 2024.

12 April, 2024 06:16 PM
Trending Interview
LSJ Exclusive Interview: How BJP govt will free Chhattisgarh from “Naxal menace”? [Watch Video]

What is Chhattisgarh govt's plan for solving the Maoist/Naxalite problem in the state? Will there be a surgical strike against the Naxals or solution will be found via diplomatic channels? Read the Exclusive Interview with the Deputy Chief Minister Vijay Sharma.

13 April, 2024 12:33 PM
Trending Judiciary
SC rejects review of order to pay Rs 1.54 Cr compensation to ex Air Force staff for transfusion of HIV infected blood [Read Order]

SC denies review of Rs 1.54 Cr HIV compensation order to ex-Air Force staff for medical negligence.

13 April, 2024 03:13 PM
Trending Legal Insiders
CJI cautions against overlooking ethical legal consideration on use of AI in court adjudication

CJI D Y Chandrachud warns about ethical, legal challenges in AI use in courts, stressing need for thorough review.

13 April, 2024 07:08 PM


Join Group

Signup for Our Newsletter

Get Exclusive access to members only content by email