Centre for Science and Environment (CSE) has welcomed the recent decision of the Advertisement Standards Council of India (ASCI) which has said that the poultry industry advertisement featuring tennis legend Sania Mirza, was misleading by facts, full of exaggeration and ambiguity. CSE has once again called on Mirza to distance herself from the advertisement in the interest of public health.
The All India Poultry Development and Services Private Limited (AIPDSPL) had issued an advertisement on February 27, 2018, on the front page of a leading national daily. The advertisement had completely misrepresented the ground reality by saying the poultry sector is not misusing antibiotics. It had also misused and misrepresented the results of a CSE study of 2014 on antibiotic residues in chicken. The
ASCI had directed AIPDSPL to withdraw or modify the advertisement by May 23, 2018. The complaint against the advertisement was filed by Humane Society International, India. The ASCI has decided that by mentioning the CSE study results, the advertisement contravened Chapter 1.3 of its code on “Truthful & Honest Representation”.“It reaffirms what we had categorically said that the advertisement was misleading the people of this country. It was wrong in telling that the poultry sector is not misusing antibiotics, which is absolutely different from the ground reality,” says Chandra Bhushan, deputy director general, CSE. “Earlier, we had written to Mirza apprising her about the malpractice of antibiotic misuse in poultry sector and the libelous nature of this advertisement. As a responsible role model, we urged her to publicly disassociate herself from the advertisement. We once again ask her to consider doing so.", says Amit Khurana, senior programme manager, food security and toxins, CSE.
From Environmental Crisis to Environmental Justice: Abhisht Kusum Gupta v. State of Uttar Pradesh
Environment
Jun 13, 2020
Harshita Agarwal
(
Editor: Ekta Joshi
)
38 Shares
Improvising the natural guideline of environmental law, access to equity and justice, and ecological dispute goals are fundamental for accomplishing the UN's 2030 plan for Sustainable Development and the Sustainable Development Goals (SDGs), especially SDG Goal 16— to provide access to justice for all and build effective, accountable and inclusive institutions at all levels.' To achieve this objective, setting up specific courts, tribunals, and councils exclusively managing environmental...
441 Views
Facebook Comments