38.6c New Delhi, India, Tuesday, October 07, 2025
Top Stories Supreme Court
Political NEWS Legislative Corner Celebstreet International Videos
Subscribe Contact Us
close
CelebStreet

Influencers indulging in commercial speech can't claim fundamental right: SC

By Jhanak Sharma      25 August, 2025 04:18 PM      0 Comments
Influencers indulging in commercial speech cant claim fundamental right SC

NEW DELHI: The Supreme Court on Monday asked the comedians who mocked the disabled people to put out an apology on their channels and inform about the penalty they were ready to pay for their acts.

The top court said influencers who indulged in commercial speech cannot claim fundamental right and they should bear in mind sensibilities of the community at large.

A bench of Justices Surya Kant and Joymalya Bagchi sought to make a distinction between freedom of speech and commercial speech.

Hearing a petition by Cure SMA Foundation of India, which supports patients and families affected by spinal muscular atrophy, the court asked influencers Samay Raina, Vipun Goyal, Balraj Paramjeet Singh Ghai, Sonali Thakkar, and Nishant Jagdish Tanwar, "whatever apology you have tendered. You go and tender that apology on your podcast, whatever channel. Display your unconditional apology there".

The NGO had raised the issue of them making jokes, mocking people with disabilities.

The bench said, "Humour is a part of life and we can take jokes on us. But when you start laughing others, and thereby create a breach of sensibility. It is not only a disability. We are a country of communities…so when on a community, humour is generated, it becomes a problem. And this is what persons who are influencers and so-called influencers of today should bear in mind".

Attorney General R Venkataramani, representing the Centre, submitted that the government would take some time to lay down guidelines for comics and influencers.

Also Watch

He said, the guidelines should try to find out if they can sensitise as far as possible it can go, and beyond the sensitisation if it fails, then somebody should take responsibility for their defaults.

The bench, however, said, "It is not only freedom of speech here. It is commerce. Commercial speech".

Referring to the judgment in Amish Devgan case, the bench said, "we have classified speech as free speech and commercial speech, and prohibited speech…if you fall into the overlap of the commercial and prohibited, you have no fundamental right there".

Senior advocate Aparajita Singh, representing the foundation, said good sense has prevailed "and all comics have apologised".

Citing the Cinematograph Act, she said, it says that one has to be sensitive to these issues, and there should be guidelines, in connection with disabilities, so that people can be put on notice that these are things, which they cannot do.

The court said let the concerned ministry do some exercise in connection with these issues.

The bench said the guidelines must not be a reaction to one incident and it has to be broad-based, and added that court would like to see the opinion of domain experts.

Samay Raina and the other comics named in the case were present in the court.

In a caution, the court told them, "Today it's about disabled, next time it can be women, senior citizens, children... where will this end?"

Singh suggested that instead of imposing penalty on the respondents, the court could consider asking them to contribute to activities, which benefit the cause of disability and patients of rare diseases, and they should use their influence in a positive manner.

The bench said that the comics would post an apology on their YouTube channel and also inform the apex court about the penalty they are willing to bear. The court fixed the matter for further hearing in November. The petition was clubbed with the cases linked to India's Got Latent controversy, in which YouTuber Ranveer Allahabadia was charged.

Disclaimer: This content is produced and published by LawStreet Journal Media for informational purposes only and does not constitute legal advice. The views expressed are independent of any legal practice of the individuals involved.



Share this article:

About:

Jhanak is a lawyer by profession and legal journalist by passion. She graduated at the top of her cl...Read more

Follow:
FacebookTwitterLinkedinInstagram


Leave a feedback about this
Related Posts
View All

Another CBI Officer Investigating Rakesh Asthana Moves SC Against Transfer, Makes Startling Revelations Another CBI Officer Investigating Rakesh Asthana Moves SC Against Transfer, Makes Startling Revelations

After A.K. Bassi, another CBI officer who was investigating corruption allegations against Special Director Rakesh Asthana moved the Supreme Court.

Ayodhya verdict: SC rules in favour of Ram Lalla, Sunni Waqf Board gets alternate land Ayodhya verdict: SC rules in favour of Ram Lalla, Sunni Waqf Board gets alternate land

SC bench led by CJI Ranjan Gogoi has allotted the dispute site to Ram Janmabhoomi Nyas, while directing the government to allot an alternate 5 acre land within Ayodhya to Sunni Waqf Board to build a mosque.

Supreme Court: Money Spent On Judiciary Less Than 1% In All States Except Delhi Supreme Court: Money Spent On Judiciary Less Than 1% In All States Except Delhi

The court guided all states to document their response to the commission's report within four weeks. If any of the states fail to file a response, it will be presumed that they have no objections to the recommendations made by the commission, the court said.

Supreme Court Top Panel Names Chief Justices for Bombay, Orissa and Meghalaya High Courts Supreme Court Top Panel Names Chief Justices for Bombay, Orissa and Meghalaya High Courts

On April 18, 2020, the Supreme Court Collegium recommended new Chief Justices for three High Courts. Justice Dipankar Datta was proposed as Chief Justice of the Bombay High Court, succeeding Justice B.P. Dharmadhikari. Justice Biswanath Somadder was nominated as Chief Justice of Meghalaya High Court, while Justice Mohammad Rafiq was recommended for transfer as Chief Justice of Orissa High Court.

TRENDING NEWS

allahabad-hc-refuses-interim-protection-to-sambhal-mosque-asks-petitioners-to-approach-appellate-court
Trending Judiciary
Allahabad HC Refuses Interim Protection to Sambhal Mosque, Asks Petitioners to Approach Appellate Court [Read Order]

Allahabad High Court refused interim protection to Sambhal mosque, directing petitioners to seek remedy before the appellate court under UP Revenue Code.

06 October, 2025 04:48 PM
calling-off-marriage-after-courtship-not-a-crime-or-breach-of-promise-delhi-hc
Trending Judiciary
Calling Off Marriage After Courtship Not A Crime Or Breach Of Promise: Delhi HC [Read Order]

Delhi High Court grants bail, ruling that ending marriage plans after courtship is not a breach of promise or offence under false promise to marry.

06 October, 2025 05:03 PM

TOP STORIES

patna-hc-quashes-fir-against-energy-drink-seller-rules-trace-alcohol-within-bis-limits
Trending Judiciary
Patna HC Quashes FIR Against Energy Drink Seller, Rules Trace Alcohol Within BIS Limits [Read Judgment]

Patna HC quashes FIR against energy drink seller, rules products with less than 0.5% alcohol meet BIS standards and don’t violate Bihar prohibition laws.

01 October, 2025 06:47 PM
tn-files-review-plea-against-sc-judgment-mandating-tet-for-in-service-teachers
Trending Judiciary
TN files review plea against SC judgment mandating TET for in service teachers

TN moves SC with review plea against mandatory TET rule, citing risk of mass teacher disqualification and disruption of children’s right to education.

01 October, 2025 11:30 PM
allahabad-hc-refuses-interim-protection-to-sambhal-mosque-asks-petitioners-to-approach-appellate-court
Trending Judiciary
Allahabad HC Refuses Interim Protection to Sambhal Mosque, Asks Petitioners to Approach Appellate Court [Read Order]

Allahabad High Court refused interim protection to Sambhal mosque, directing petitioners to seek remedy before the appellate court under UP Revenue Code.

06 October, 2025 04:48 PM
calling-off-marriage-after-courtship-not-a-crime-or-breach-of-promise-delhi-hc
Trending Judiciary
Calling Off Marriage After Courtship Not A Crime Or Breach Of Promise: Delhi HC [Read Order]

Delhi High Court grants bail, ruling that ending marriage plans after courtship is not a breach of promise or offence under false promise to marry.

06 October, 2025 05:03 PM

ADVERTISEMENT


Join Group

Signup for Our Newsletter

Get Exclusive access to members only content by email