38.6c New Delhi, India, Monday, January 12, 2026
Top Stories Supreme Court
Political NEWS Legislative Corner Celebstreet International Videos
Subscribe Contact Us
close
CelebStreet

IPL betting case: Director Arbaaz Khan Admits to betting

By LawStreet News Network      05 June, 2018 03:52 AM      0 Comments

Bollywood actor, director, and producer Arbaaz Khan admits to placing bets during the Indian Premier League after the Thane police officials summoned him for questioning in regards to a betting probe into the IPL matches.

Pradeep Sharma, the senior inspector of the anti-extortion cell, said "Arbaaz Khan has admitted that he used to place bets during Indian Premier League or IPL matches and "connection between Arbaaz and Jalan has been established and the actor has been asked to appear at the AEC office on Saturday." The betting racket was operated by India's top bookies, Sonu Jalan and Sonu Malad, from Mumbai.

Arbaaz Khan has allegedly lost 2.80 Cr in IPL bets, and when he was not able to pay the amount to Sonu Jalan, Jalan threatened the actor an official said. Earlier Jalan was arrested in 2012 by the Mumbai Police for betting on the IPL match.

Sonu Jalan also told Mumbai crime branch that he paid Rs 10 Cr to a Sri Lankan player for fixing a match.

According to Pradeep Sharma, Jalan just returned from Dubai after a meeting with Dawood. He even has links in Pakistan, Afghanistan and other countries. We are interrogating him about these links and about his money.

Jalan and four others who were running the betting ring for the current season of IPL were charged under the Sections of IPC 420, 468, 465, 471 and several other sections of Bombay Gambling Act, IT Act and Indian Telegraph Act.

Officials believe that some more names of Bollywood personalities could be involved as they had placed and participated in the betting ring run by Jalan.



Share this article:

User Avatar
About:


Leave a feedback about this
TRENDING NEWS


TOP STORIES

wrong-bail-orders-alone-without-evidence-of-corruption-cannot-justify-removal-of-judicial-officer-sc
Trending Judiciary
Wrong Bail Orders Alone, Without Evidence of Corruption, Cannot Justify Removal of Judicial Officer: SC [Read Judgment]

Supreme Court rules that wrong bail orders alone cannot justify removal of a judicial officer without proof of corruption, misconduct, or extraneous considerations.

06 January, 2026 07:43 PM
divorced-muslim-woman-can-seek-maintenance-under-crpc-even-after-receiving-amount-under-muslim-women-protection-act-kerala-hc
Trending Judiciary
Divorced Muslim Woman Can Seek Maintenance Under CrPC Even After Receiving Amount Under Muslim Women Protection Act: Kerala HC [Read Order]

Kerala High Court holds that a divorced Muslim woman can claim maintenance under Section 125 CrPC even after receiving amounts under the 1986 Act.

06 January, 2026 08:19 PM
delhi-hc-full-bench-settles-bsf-seniority-dispute-rule-of-continuous-regular-appointment-prevails
Trending Judiciary
Delhi HC Full Bench Settles BSF Seniority Dispute; Rule of ‘Continuous Regular Appointment’ Prevails [Read Judgment]

Delhi High Court Full Bench rules BSF seniority is based on date of continuous regular appointment, rejecting claims for antedated seniority due to delayed joining.

06 January, 2026 08:45 PM
borrowers-cannot-invoke-writ-jurisdiction-to-compel-banks-to-extend-one-time-settlement-benefits-kerala-hc
Trending Judiciary
Borrowers Cannot Invoke Writ Jurisdiction to Compel Banks to Extend One-Time Settlement Benefits: Kerala HC [Read Judgment]

Kerala High Court holds borrowers cannot invoke writ jurisdiction to compel banks to grant One-Time Settlement benefits, as OTS is not a legal right.

07 January, 2026 09:22 PM

ADVERTISEMENT


Join Group

Signup for Our Newsletter

Get Exclusive access to members only content by email