38.6c New Delhi, India, Tuesday, December 09, 2025
Top Stories Supreme Court
Political NEWS Legislative Corner Celebstreet International Videos
Subscribe Contact Us
close
CelebStreet

Kamaal R Khan Moves Bombay High Court Against Restraining Order in Salman Khan Defamation Suit

By Nargis Bano      19 September, 2021 11:27 AM      0 Comments
Kamaal R Khan Moves Bombay High Court Against Restraining Order in Salman Khan Defamation Suit

Actor Kamaal R Khan (KRK) has petitioned the Bombay High Court to overturn a restraining order issued by a Mumbai court in response to a defamation complaint filed by Bollywood actor Salman Khan.

The Mumbai City Civil Court issued the injunction on June 23, 2021, prohibiting KRK from creating and uploading videos, posting, tweeting, or publishing any defamatory content, directly or indirectly, about Salman Khan, his business ventures, and films/projects, including the most recent film 'Radhe.'

KRK filed an appeal with the High Court against this "blanket order," claiming that he was a film critic whose job it was to review films.

Justice AS Gadkari was informed by Advocate Parag Khandhar, who is representing Khan, that the appeal was served late last night and that he needs some time to respond to it.

As a result, the case was postponed for two weeks with the instruction that all respondents be served.

KRK sought the revocation of the June 2021 order in his appeal, which was filed through Advocate Manoj Gadkari. The following are just a few of the grounds that KRK has taken:

Because the ingredients for granting an injunction had not been met, the lower court made a grave error in granting a blanket injunction preventing KRK from posting content.

That once a creator has made his creation public, he cannot prevent the public from forming an opinion about it, even if the opinion is negative;

As a film critic, he is free to review films that have been made available to the public, or to declare whether an actor or actress is a success or a flop.

The lower court should have limited its orders to the alleged defamatory statements in the suit rather than issuing a blanket order prohibiting KRK from publishing his comments on current and future films, and the order is in the nature of a gag order, which is improper.

The lower court erred in issuing a temporary injunction as "final relief" instead of a permanent injunction because the prayers in the notice of motion and the suit are identical, which is not permissible.

Khan and his company Salman Khan Ventures Private Limited sought Rs. 90 lakh in damages from KRK for allegedly defamatory remarks, videos, and online content posted by KRK against Khan.

It was also claimed that in another video posted in November 2020, KRK made claims against Khan's brand 'Being Human,' claiming that the charity organisation was involved in fraud and money laundering.

Such false allegations, according to Khan, will tarnish the goodwill, reputation, and image of his brand, which he has built over years of hard work and effort.

Khan and his business ventures are being represented by a DSK Legal team that includes Managing Partner Anand Desai, Partner Chandrima Mitra, and Khandhar.



Share this article:



Leave a feedback about this
TRENDING NEWS

sc-questions-precedent-on-contractual-bars-to-arbitration-claims-refers-bharat-drilling-to-larger-bench
Trending Judiciary
SC Questions Precedent on Contractual Bars to Arbitration Claims, Refers ‘Bharat Drilling’ to Larger Bench [Read Judgment]

Supreme Court refers the 2009 Bharat Drilling ruling to a larger bench, questioning its use in interpreting contractual bars on arbitration claims.

08 December, 2025 04:45 PM
j-and-k-high-court-upholds-dismissal-of-injunction-plea-in-agrarian-reforms-dispute
Trending Judiciary
J&K High Court Upholds Dismissal of Injunction Plea in Agrarian Reforms Dispute [Read Order]

J&K High Court upholds dismissal of injunction plea, ruling that agrarian disputes fall under Agrarian Reforms Act authorities, not civil courts.

08 December, 2025 05:21 PM

TOP STORIES

hostile-india-china-ties-no-extradition-treaty-allahabad-hc-denies-bail-to-chinese-national-in-visa-forgery-case
Trending Judiciary
Hostile India–China Ties, No Extradition Treaty: Allahabad HC Denies Bail to Chinese National in Visa Forgery Case [Read Order]

Allahabad High Court denies bail to a Chinese national accused of visa tampering and forging Indian IDs, citing hostile India–China ties and no extradition treaty.

03 December, 2025 12:53 AM
attachment-before-judgment-cannot-cover-property-sold-prior-to-suit-filing-sc
Trending Judiciary
Attachment Before Judgment Cannot Cover Property Sold Prior to Suit Filing: SC [Read Judgment]

Supreme Court holds that property transferred before a suit cannot be attached under Order 38 Rule 5; fraud allegations must be pursued separately under Section 53 TP Act.

03 December, 2025 01:30 AM
sc-holds-no-review-or-appeal-maintainable-against-order-appointing-arbitrator
Trending Judiciary
SC Holds No Review Or Appeal Maintainable Against Order Appointing Arbitrator [Read Judgment]

Supreme Court rules that no review, recall or appeal lies against a Section 11 arbitrator appointment order, reaffirming minimal judicial interference in arbitration.

03 December, 2025 01:40 AM
partner-cannot-invoke-arbitration-clause-without-express-authorisation-of-other-partners-kerala-hc
Trending Judiciary
Partner Cannot Invoke Arbitration Clause Without Express Authorisation of Other Partners: Kerala HC [Read Order]

Kerala High Court rules that a partner cannot invoke an arbitration clause or seek appointment of an arbitrator without express authorisation from co-partners.

03 December, 2025 05:19 PM

ADVERTISEMENT


Join Group

Signup for Our Newsletter

Get Exclusive access to members only content by email