38.6c New Delhi, India, Sunday, April 19, 2026
Top Stories Supreme Court
Political NEWS Legislative Corner Celebstreet International Videos
Subscribe Contact Us
close
CelebStreet

Kamaal R Khan Moves Bombay High Court Against Restraining Order in Salman Khan Defamation Suit

By Nargis Bano      19 September, 2021 11:27 AM      0 Comments
Kamaal R Khan Moves Bombay High Court Against Restraining Order in Salman Khan Defamation Suit

Actor Kamaal R Khan (KRK) has petitioned the Bombay High Court to overturn a restraining order issued by a Mumbai court in response to a defamation complaint filed by Bollywood actor Salman Khan.

The Mumbai City Civil Court issued the injunction on June 23, 2021, prohibiting KRK from creating and uploading videos, posting, tweeting, or publishing any defamatory content, directly or indirectly, about Salman Khan, his business ventures, and films/projects, including the most recent film 'Radhe.'

KRK filed an appeal with the High Court against this "blanket order," claiming that he was a film critic whose job it was to review films.

Justice AS Gadkari was informed by Advocate Parag Khandhar, who is representing Khan, that the appeal was served late last night and that he needs some time to respond to it.

As a result, the case was postponed for two weeks with the instruction that all respondents be served.

KRK sought the revocation of the June 2021 order in his appeal, which was filed through Advocate Manoj Gadkari. The following are just a few of the grounds that KRK has taken:

Because the ingredients for granting an injunction had not been met, the lower court made a grave error in granting a blanket injunction preventing KRK from posting content.

That once a creator has made his creation public, he cannot prevent the public from forming an opinion about it, even if the opinion is negative;

As a film critic, he is free to review films that have been made available to the public, or to declare whether an actor or actress is a success or a flop.

The lower court should have limited its orders to the alleged defamatory statements in the suit rather than issuing a blanket order prohibiting KRK from publishing his comments on current and future films, and the order is in the nature of a gag order, which is improper.

The lower court erred in issuing a temporary injunction as "final relief" instead of a permanent injunction because the prayers in the notice of motion and the suit are identical, which is not permissible.

Khan and his company Salman Khan Ventures Private Limited sought Rs. 90 lakh in damages from KRK for allegedly defamatory remarks, videos, and online content posted by KRK against Khan.

It was also claimed that in another video posted in November 2020, KRK made claims against Khan's brand 'Being Human,' claiming that the charity organisation was involved in fraud and money laundering.

Such false allegations, according to Khan, will tarnish the goodwill, reputation, and image of his brand, which he has built over years of hard work and effort.

Khan and his business ventures are being represented by a DSK Legal team that includes Managing Partner Anand Desai, Partner Chandrima Mitra, and Khandhar.



Share this article:



Leave a feedback about this
TRENDING NEWS

cci-dismisses-complaint-against-adani-group-in-12-gw-solar-project-case-finds-no-prima-facie-bid-rigging-or-abuse-of-dominance
Trending Business
CCI Dismisses Complaint Against Adani Group in ₹12 GW Solar Project Case, Finds No Prima Facie Bid Rigging or Abuse of Dominance [Read Order]

Competition Commission of India dismisses allegations of bid rigging and abuse of dominance against Adani Group in 12 GW solar project case.

18 April, 2026 02:10 PM
every-sinner-has-a-future-karnataka-hc-reduces-auto-rickshaw-drivers-jail-term-for-robbing-lone-woman-passenger
Trending Judiciary
‘Every Sinner Has a Future’: Karnataka HC Reduces Auto-Rickshaw Driver’s Jail Term for Robbing Lone Woman Passenger [Read Order]

Karnataka HC upholds conviction but reduces sentence of auto driver, directs ₹4 lakh compensation to victim in robbery case.

18 April, 2026 02:20 PM

TOP STORIES

sc-issues-notice-on-ashwini-upadhyays-plea-seeking-biometric-and-facial-recognition-for-voters
Trending Judiciary
SC Issues Notice on Ashwini Upadhyay’s Plea Seeking Biometric and Facial Recognition for Voters

Supreme Court issues notice on Ashwini Upadhyay’s plea seeking biometric and facial recognition of voters to curb electoral malpractices.

13 April, 2026 05:11 PM
gujarat-hc-grants-bail-to-13-year-old-juvenile-says-jj-act-overrides-crpc-in-bail-matters
Trending Judiciary
Gujarat HC Grants Bail to 13-Year-Old Juvenile, Says JJ Act Overrides CrPC in Bail Matters [Read Order]

Gujarat High Court grants bail to 13-year-old, rules JJ Act prevails over CrPC in juvenile bail matters under Section 12.

13 April, 2026 05:19 PM
every-breakup-lands-man-in-jail-karnataka-hc-orders-release-raises-concern-over-section-69-bns-misuse
Trending Judiciary
“Every Breakup Lands Man in Jail”: Karnataka HC Orders Release, Raises Concern Over Section 69 BNS Misuse [Read Order]

Karnataka High Court orders release of man jailed 42 days in false promise of marriage case, flags rising misuse of Section 69 BNS.

13 April, 2026 05:25 PM
priests-who-have-travelled-abroad-cannot-enter-sanctum-sanctorum-andhra-pradesh-hc-orders-strict-compliance-with-2010-circular
Trending Judiciary
Priests Who Have Travelled Abroad Cannot Enter Sanctum Sanctorum: Andhra Pradesh HC Orders Strict Compliance with 2010 Circular [Read Order]

Andhra Pradesh High Court directs strict enforcement of 2010 circular barring priests who travelled abroad from entering sanctum sanctorum.

14 April, 2026 01:25 PM

ADVERTISEMENT


Join Group

Signup for Our Newsletter

Get Exclusive access to members only content by email