38.6c New Delhi, India, Wednesday, February 18, 2026
Top Stories Supreme Court
Political NEWS Legislative Corner Celebstreet International Videos
Subscribe Contact Us
close
CelebStreet

Co-accused in Kapil Sharma cheating case granted bail by Addl. Chief Metropolitan magistrates court, Esplanade Mumbai [Read Order]

By Mathews Savio      10 February, 2021 11:11 AM      0 Comments
Kapil Sharma cheating case

Kanchan Harkishan Chhabria and Nihal Baldev Bajaj, the persons accused along with Dilip Kumar Chhabria for allegedly cheating comedian Kapil Sharma, were granted conditional bail by Addl. Chief Metropolitan Magistrate, 37th Court, Esplanade Mumbai today in separate bail orders.

The applicants are high-level executives in the D. C. Design Pvt. Ltd. that manufactures designer cars at its facility in Pune. In 2017 Kapil Sharma has ordered a vanity car made by the company by paying a sum of Rs. 5.7 crores. But after multiple delays and paying the additional payment of Rs. 40 Lakhs demanded as GST Kapil Sharma approached the NCLT to freeze the accounts of the car manufacturer.  In retaliation, D. C. Designs demanded an additional payment of Rs. 12 Lakhs as parking charges for his car in the company premises. This forced Kapil Sharma to approach the Economic Offenses Wing (EOW) of Crime Investigation Unit (CIU) of the Mumbai police with a cheating case. 

Dilip Chhabria was already under arrest at the time in fraud cases registered against him for duping several Non-Banking Financial Companies by availing multiple loans on the same luxury cars by manipulating their registration numbers. Kanchan, Dilips sister and CEO of the Company, and Nihal, senior sales executive of the company, were booked on 28th January 2021.

In separate bail applications filed for Kanchan and Nihal, it was pleaded by Adv. Amit Dubey, counsel representing the applicants, that the accused had no direct connection with the alleged offence and were not aware of the intentions of Dilip Chhabria. Further, it was said that the material investigation against the accused persons has been completed and their names were not mentioned in the FIR. The applicants also argued that the case is targeting the whole of the Chhabria family to coarse them to settle a civil dispute with Indermal Ramani and Kiran Kumar who initially field a frivolous FIR against Dilip Chhabria which led to his arrest. The counsel further stated that now the whole Chabriya family has false charges slapped on them.

Applicant's counsel appealed to the court that Sections 409 (criminal breach of trust) and 420 (cheating) of the Indian Penal Code was not made out against the applicants in the case as the Vanity Van was already 90% complete and Kapil Sharma has already inspected it. To establish cheating the main ingredient for cheating that is the intention to cheat should be present from the very beginning. Further, it was argued that Kapil Sharma never came forward to finalise the deal and when Dilip was arrested he has filed the FIR to get a quick settlement in the issue already pending before the NCLT.

The investigating officer and the Additional Public Prosecutor contested the application stating that the investigation against the applicants is still underway. They argued that considering the serious nature of the crime and the chance of the accused absconding and tampering with evidence bail should not be granted.

The court held that the investigation against both persons seemed have been completed and there is nothing so far mentioned in the case diary that points to the common intention of the applicants and the main accused. Also, their names are not mentioned in the FIR. The sum of Rs. 40 lakhs were wholly transferred to the account of Dilip so the role of the accused in the crime is not established. In the case of Kanchan her old age was also considered by the court.

In the bail order, strict conditions are placed on the applicants. The applicants are to submit a personal bond of Rs. 25000 and one surety of the same value for each and are to report to the investigating agency once in a week for one month.

 

[Read Order]

Kanchan Harkishan Chhabria Bail Order

Nihal Baldev Bajaj Bail Order

 



Share this article:



Leave a feedback about this
TRENDING NEWS

nobody-should-believe-anybody-before-marriage-sc-cautions-against-pre-marital-physical-relationships
Trending Judiciary
“Nobody Should Believe Anybody Before Marriage”: SC Cautions Against Pre-Marital Physical Relationships

Supreme Court cautions young adults on pre-marital relationships in a bail plea over rape on false promise of marriage; suggests mediation.

17 February, 2026 04:47 PM
allahabad-hc-refers-advocate-for-criminal-contempt-after-alleged-scandalous-remarks-during-bail-hearing
Trending Judiciary
Allahabad HC Refers Advocate for Criminal Contempt After Alleged Scandalous Remarks During Bail Hearing [Read Order]

Allahabad High Court refers advocate for criminal contempt over alleged scandalous remarks during a bail hearing in Uttar Pradesh.

17 February, 2026 05:15 PM

TOP STORIES

sc-notifies-2026-guidelines-for-senior-advocate-designation-scraps-point-system-and-interviews
Trending Judiciary
SC Notifies 2026 Guidelines for Senior Advocate Designation; Scraps Point System and Interviews [Read Notification]

Supreme Court notifies 2026 guidelines for Senior Advocate designation, abolishing point system and interviews; introduces holistic evaluation process.

12 February, 2026 04:00 PM
sunjay-kapur-will-dispute-priya-sachdev-files-application-to-dismiss-mil-rani-kapurs-family-trust-fraud-allegations
Trending Judiciary
Sunjay Kapur Will Dispute: Priya Sachdev Files Application To Dismiss MIL Rani Kapur’s Family Trust Fraud Allegations

Delhi HC issues notice on Priya Kapur’s plea to dismiss Rani Kapur’s suit alleging a fraudulent family trust to divert late Sunjay Kapur’s estate.

12 February, 2026 04:32 PM
girlfriend-cannot-be-deemed-relative-of-husband-telangana-hc
Trending Judiciary
Girlfriend Cannot Be Deemed ‘Relative’ of Husband: Telangana HC [Read Order]

Telangana High Court quashes case against girlfriend, holds she is not a “relative” under Section 498A IPC and cannot be charged with stalking under Section 354D.

12 February, 2026 04:46 PM
allahabad-hc-stays-section-174-a-ipc-proceedings-against-mla-abbas-ansari
Trending Judiciary
Allahabad HC Stays Section 174-A IPC Proceedings Against MLA Abbas Ansari [Read Order]

Allahabad High Court stayed proceedings against MLA Abbas Ansari under Section 174-A IPC over alleged non-compliance with proclamation proceedings.

12 February, 2026 05:08 PM

ADVERTISEMENT


Join Group

Signup for Our Newsletter

Get Exclusive access to members only content by email