38.6c New Delhi, India, Tuesday, August 05, 2025
Top Stories Supreme Court
Political NEWS Legislative Corner Celebstreet International Videos
Subscribe Contact Us
close
CelebStreet

Co-accused in Kapil Sharma cheating case granted bail by Addl. Chief Metropolitan magistrates court, Esplanade Mumbai [Read Order]

By Mathews Savio      10 February, 2021 11:11 AM      0 Comments
Kapil Sharma cheating case

Kanchan Harkishan Chhabria and Nihal Baldev Bajaj, the persons accused along with Dilip Kumar Chhabria for allegedly cheating comedian Kapil Sharma, were granted conditional bail by Addl. Chief Metropolitan Magistrate, 37th Court, Esplanade Mumbai today in separate bail orders.

The applicants are high-level executives in the D. C. Design Pvt. Ltd. that manufactures designer cars at its facility in Pune. In 2017 Kapil Sharma has ordered a vanity car made by the company by paying a sum of Rs. 5.7 crores. But after multiple delays and paying the additional payment of Rs. 40 Lakhs demanded as GST Kapil Sharma approached the NCLT to freeze the accounts of the car manufacturer.  In retaliation, D. C. Designs demanded an additional payment of Rs. 12 Lakhs as parking charges for his car in the company premises. This forced Kapil Sharma to approach the Economic Offenses Wing (EOW) of Crime Investigation Unit (CIU) of the Mumbai police with a cheating case. 

Dilip Chhabria was already under arrest at the time in fraud cases registered against him for duping several Non-Banking Financial Companies by availing multiple loans on the same luxury cars by manipulating their registration numbers. Kanchan, Dilips sister and CEO of the Company, and Nihal, senior sales executive of the company, were booked on 28th January 2021.

In separate bail applications filed for Kanchan and Nihal, it was pleaded by Adv. Amit Dubey, counsel representing the applicants, that the accused had no direct connection with the alleged offence and were not aware of the intentions of Dilip Chhabria. Further, it was said that the material investigation against the accused persons has been completed and their names were not mentioned in the FIR. The applicants also argued that the case is targeting the whole of the Chhabria family to coarse them to settle a civil dispute with Indermal Ramani and Kiran Kumar who initially field a frivolous FIR against Dilip Chhabria which led to his arrest. The counsel further stated that now the whole Chabriya family has false charges slapped on them.

Applicant's counsel appealed to the court that Sections 409 (criminal breach of trust) and 420 (cheating) of the Indian Penal Code was not made out against the applicants in the case as the Vanity Van was already 90% complete and Kapil Sharma has already inspected it. To establish cheating the main ingredient for cheating that is the intention to cheat should be present from the very beginning. Further, it was argued that Kapil Sharma never came forward to finalise the deal and when Dilip was arrested he has filed the FIR to get a quick settlement in the issue already pending before the NCLT.

The investigating officer and the Additional Public Prosecutor contested the application stating that the investigation against the applicants is still underway. They argued that considering the serious nature of the crime and the chance of the accused absconding and tampering with evidence bail should not be granted.

The court held that the investigation against both persons seemed have been completed and there is nothing so far mentioned in the case diary that points to the common intention of the applicants and the main accused. Also, their names are not mentioned in the FIR. The sum of Rs. 40 lakhs were wholly transferred to the account of Dilip so the role of the accused in the crime is not established. In the case of Kanchan her old age was also considered by the court.

In the bail order, strict conditions are placed on the applicants. The applicants are to submit a personal bond of Rs. 25000 and one surety of the same value for each and are to report to the investigating agency once in a week for one month.

 

[Read Order]

Kanchan Harkishan Chhabria Bail Order

Nihal Baldev Bajaj Bail Order

 



Share this article:



Leave a feedback about this
TRENDING NEWS

bengaluru-court-convicts-ex-mp-prajwal-revanna-in-rape-case
Trending Judiciary
Bengaluru court convicts ex MP Prajwal Revanna in rape case

Bengaluru court convicts ex-MP Prajwal Revanna in rape case linked to explicit videos; one of four sexual abuse cases filed against him.

04 August, 2025 11:07 AM
sc-sets-aside-order-declaring-man-as-juvenile-on-basis-of-school-certificate
Trending Judiciary
SC sets aside order declaring man as juvenile on basis of school certificate [Read Judgment]

SC: School certificate from private school not valid proof of age, sets aside order declaring murder accused as juvenile.

04 August, 2025 11:24 AM

TOP STORIES

a-new-dawn-in-indias-criminal-justice-system-replacing-colonial-shackles-with-indigenous-legal-reforms
Trending Vantage Points
A New Dawn in India’s Criminal Justice System: Replacing Colonial Shackles with Indigenous Legal Reforms

This research paper examines India’s transition from IPC, CrPC, and IEA to BNS, BNSS, and BSA, emphasizing victim-centric and technology-driven justice reforms.

30 July, 2025 12:41 PM
your-conduct-does-not-inspire-confidence-sc-reserves-judgment-on-justice-yashwant-varmas-plea
Trending Judiciary
‘Your Conduct Does Not Inspire Confidence’: SC Reserves Judgment on Justice Yashwant Varma’s Plea

CJI can recommend removal of a judge in cases of grave misconduct, SC says; clarifies CJI isn’t a mere post office & Parliament has final say.

30 July, 2025 04:14 PM
cricket-stadium-would-be-required-sc-slams-tn-govt-again-for-roping-2000-accused-500-witnesses
Trending Judiciary
'Cricket stadium would be required,' SC slams TN govt again for roping 2000 accused, 500 witnesses in trial against Senthil Balaji

SC slams TN govt for implicating 2,000 accused & 500 witnesses in Senthil Balaji cash-for-jobs case, says trial needs a cricket stadium to fit all.

30 July, 2025 05:20 PM
accident-on-way-to-office-and-return-to-be-covered-for-compensation-under-ec-act-sc
Trending Judiciary
Accident on way to office and return to be covered for compensation under EC Act: SC [Read Judgment]

SC: Accidents while commuting to and from work covered under Employees’ Compensation Act, 1923; ruling gives retrospective effect to benefit employees.

30 July, 2025 05:28 PM

ADVERTISEMENT


Join Group

Signup for Our Newsletter

Get Exclusive access to members only content by email