38.6c New Delhi, India, Friday, May 15, 2026
Top Stories Supreme Court
Political NEWS Legislative Corner Celebstreet International Videos
Subscribe Contact Us
close
CelebStreet

Lawyer fined Rs. 10,000 for filing a false case against Salman Khan and Shilpa Shetty by Ludhiana court

By LawStreet News Network      02 May, 2018 12:12 PM      0 Comments

A city-based Advocate Narinder Adia had to pay Rs 10,000 as fine imposed by the Court of Judicial Magistrate Sumit Sabherwal, Ludhiana court while dismissing the complaint filed by the Advocate against Bollywood stars Salman Khan and Shilpa Shetty for allegedly using the derogatory word against a particular community.

Rejecting the lawyers petition filed under section 295A of the IPC 1860 (deliberate and malicious acts, intended to outrage religious feelings of any class by insulting its religion or religious beliefs), the court said, As the court has not proceeded to summon the accused, the cost of Rs 10,000 is imposed on the complainant. The same is to be paid to the District Legal Services Authority (DLSA) failing which the complainant shall undergo simple imprisonment for 30 days.

It added, All that complainant has been alleging is that religious feelings have been hurt as both the accused have called themselves Bhangi. In these set of circumstances, comparing oneself with Bhangi in the absence of intentional and deliberate malice to hurt the other person, cannot be said to have been sufficing for prosecution for the alleged offences under the SC/ST Act. The court also turned down the complaint filed by the complainant seeking action under SC and ST act against Salman Khan and Shilpa Shetty.

The court ordered. Before parting with the present order, this Court is of the considered opinion that the complaint was made without any reasonable cause and, the necessary cost is directed to be paid.

Stay Tuned to Lawstreet Journal for latest News and Updates

 



Share this article:

User Avatar
About:


Leave a feedback about this
TRENDING NEWS

no-offence-under-sc-st-act-if-alleged-casteist-abuse-occurred-inside-private-house-sc
Trending Judiciary
No Offence Under SC/ST Act If Alleged Casteist Abuse Occurred Inside Private House: SC [Read Judgment]

Supreme Court rules SC/ST Act offence is not made out if alleged casteist abuse occurred inside a private house without public view.

14 May, 2026 03:16 PM
madras-hc-bars-tiruppattur-mla-from-floor-test-over-disputed-one-vote-victory
Trending Judiciary
Madras HC Bars Tiruppattur MLA From Floor Test Over Disputed One-Vote Victory [Read Order]

Madras High Court restrains Tiruppattur MLA from floor test participation over disputed one-vote victory and alleged electoral irregularities.

14 May, 2026 03:24 PM

TOP STORIES

delhi-hc-refers-to-larger-bench-issue-on-stage-of-hearing-accused-under-section-223-bnss-before-cognizance
Trending Judiciary
Delhi HC Refers to Larger Bench Issue on Stage of Hearing Accused Under Section 223 BNSS Before Cognizance [Read Judgment]

Delhi High Court refers to Larger Bench issue on when accused must be heard under Section 223 BNSS before taking cognizance.

09 May, 2026 10:25 AM
hymen-intact-does-not-mean-no-penetration-delhi-high-court-upholds-pocso-conviction-of-tenant-who-raped-six-year-old-girl
Trending Judiciary
‘Hymen Intact Does Not Mean No Penetration’: Delhi High Court Upholds POCSO Conviction of Tenant Who Raped Six-Year-Old Girl [Read Order]

Delhi High Court upheld a tenant’s POCSO conviction for raping a six-year-old girl, holding that an intact hymen does not negate penetration.

09 May, 2026 12:42 PM
consumer-commission-directs-bus-operator-to-pay-50000-compensation-after-barat-reaches-wedding-destination-at-3-am-due-to-breakdown
Trending Judiciary
Consumer Commission Directs Bus Operator to Pay ₹50,000 Compensation After Barat Reaches Wedding Destination at 3 AM Due to Breakdown [Read Order]

Delhi Consumer Commission ordered a bus operator to pay ₹50,000 compensation after a Barat reached the wedding venue at 3 AM due to breakdown.

09 May, 2026 01:56 PM
sabarimala-reference-day-13-can-faith-justify-civil-death-and-genital-cutting-of-children-sc-bench-examines-religions-reach-over-the-body
Trending Judiciary
Sabarimala Reference Day 13: “Can Faith Justify Civil Death and Genital Cutting of Children?”: SC Bench Examines Religion’s Reach Over the Body

SC’s nine-judge bench examined whether religious practices violating dignity, bodily autonomy and conscience can claim protection under Article 26.

09 May, 2026 02:25 PM

ADVERTISEMENT


Join Group

Signup for Our Newsletter

Get Exclusive access to members only content by email