38.6c New Delhi, India, Thursday, February 19, 2026
Top Stories Supreme Court
Political NEWS Legislative Corner Celebstreet International Videos
Subscribe Contact Us
close
CelebStreet

Mahesh Bhatt, Mukesh Bhatt file Rs 1 cr. defamation suit in HC against actor Luveina Lodh

By Richa Shah      30 October, 2020 11:00 AM      0 Comments
Mahesh Bhatt, Mukesh Bhatt file Rs 1 cr. defamation suit in HC against actor LuveinaLodh

Bollywood filmmaker Mahesh Bhatt and his Mukesh Bhatt have filed a defamation suit against actor LuveinaLodh for claiming that they are harassing her and are aware of Lodhs husbands drug and human trafficking business.

This defamation suit was filed on Monday (26th October 2020) in the Bombay High Court against an aspiring actor LuvienaLodh for making defamatory, slanderous, and false allegations against them. 

Damages of Rs 1 crore from Lodh have been sought for and also an order restraining her from making any such false claims in the future as well.

An urgent hearing was taken up by the Bombay High Court in this matter. This case was heard by a single bench consisting of Justice A K Menon. Lodh was directed to file a reply and posted it for hearing after three weeks. The court was assured by Lodhs advocate that she would not publish or make any such statement against the Bhatts in the future.

Last week, Lodh had posted a video on social media stating that she was married to Sumit Sabharwal, who is allegedly Mahesh Bhatts nephew. In the video, Lodh alleged that Sabharwal was in the business of supplying drugs and also human trafficking.

It was alleged by Lodh that Mahesh Bhatt was aware of the drug and human trafficking business. After the video was posted on social media, Mahesh Bhatt, through his counsel Ameet Naik, sent a legal notice to Lodh asking her to stop making such false statements.

Later, the Bhatts filed a defamation suit in the Bombay High Court seeking Lodh to be restrained from making, publishing, and circulating any defamatory and slanderous comments against them.

The defamation suit stated that The suit is also seeking damages to the tune of Rs one crore from the respondent (Lodh) for making various grossly defamatory, slanderous, distasteful and false allegations and statements against the applicants (Bhatts). The suit also asked Lodh to delete the video and also claimed that Sabharwal who was the husband of Lodh was not directly related to the Bhatts and that he was the son of the applicants sisters husbands brother.

The suit further said that false allegations against Mahesh and Mukesh Bhatt were made by Lodh with malicious intentions to obtain the best settlement in her divorce proceedings with her estranged husband as the Bhatts were a famous name in the industry.



Share this article:



Leave a feedback about this
TRENDING NEWS


TOP STORIES

madras-hc-directs-ms-dhoni-to-pay-10-lakh-for-transcription-of-cds-in-defamation-suit
Trending Judiciary
Madras HC Directs MS Dhoni to Pay ₹10 Lakh for Transcription of CDs in Defamation Suit [Read Order]

Madras High Court directs MS Dhoni to pay ₹10 lakh for transcription and translation of CDs in his defamation suit against Zee Media.

13 February, 2026 02:36 PM
sc-holds-successive-fir-registration-to-keep-accused-in-custody-is-abuse-of-process-grants-bail-under-article-32
Trending Judiciary
SC Holds Successive FIR Registration to Keep Accused in Custody Is Abuse of Process; Grants Bail Under Article 32 [Read Order]

Supreme Court calls successive FIRs to keep accused in custody an abuse of process, grants bail under Article 32 in Jharkhand case.

13 February, 2026 02:48 PM
sc-holds-post-arbitral-award-transferee-cannot-resist-execution-reaffirms-lis-pendens-doctrine-applies-to-money-decrees
Trending Judiciary
SC Holds Post-Arbitral Award Transferee Cannot Resist Execution; Reaffirms Lis Pendens Doctrine Applies to Money Decrees [Read Judgment]

Supreme Court rules post-arbitral award purchasers can’t block execution; lis pendens applies to money decrees under Transfer of Property Act.

13 February, 2026 02:59 PM
sc-holds-anticipatory-bail-has-no-time-limit-protection-continues-after-chargesheet
Trending Judiciary
SC Holds Anticipatory Bail Has No Time Limit, Protection Continues After Chargesheet [Read Order]

Supreme Court rules anticipatory bail has no time limit, continues after chargesheet, and High Courts can’t restrict protection to investigation stage.

13 February, 2026 03:11 PM

ADVERTISEMENT


Join Group

Signup for Our Newsletter

Get Exclusive access to members only content by email