38.6c New Delhi, India, Monday, January 12, 2026
Top Stories Supreme Court
Political NEWS Legislative Corner Celebstreet International Videos
Subscribe Contact Us
close
CelebStreet

Mumbai Police Books Sushants Sisters for Abetment of Suicide based on Rhea Chakrabortys Complaint

By Saransh Awasthi      09 September, 2020 04:05 PM      0 Comments
Mumbai Police Books Sushants Sisters for Abetment of Suicide based on Rhea Chakrabortys Complaint

The Mumbai Police have registered a FIR against actor Sushant Singh Rajput's sisters Priyanka Singh and Meetu Singh for cheating, forgery & abetment of suicide in the Bollywood actors death case.

The FIR, based on a complaint filed by actress Rhea Chakraborty, states that the accused hatched a conspiracy and obtained false prescription on the letterhead of a government hospital for a banned medicine which is annexed under the NDPS Act and administered the same without supervising doses and quantity which may result in a chronic anxiety attack and which resulted in the commission of suicide.

Police inspector Pramod Kumbhar at the Bandra Police Station registered an FIR against the two sisters and Dr. Tarun Kumar, a cardiology professor from Dr. Ram Manohar Lohia Hospital, New Delhi. They have been booked under Sections 420 (cheating and dishonestly inducing delivery of property), 464 (making a false document), 465 (punishment for forgery), 466 (forgery of record of Court or of public register, etc.), 468 (forgery for purpose of cheating), 474 (having possession of document), 306 (abetment of suicide) and 120B (criminal conspiracy) of the Indian Penal Code.

In her seven-page complaint, the actress while stating that the late actor, suffering from bipolar disorder, was careless towards his treatment alleged that some WhatsApp chats between Sushant and Priyanka advising him for proper medication was extremely disturbing and disclose the commission of various offenses. She said that On June 8, 2020, Sushant showed her text messages exchanged with his sister Ms. Singh and she was shocked to read that Ms. Singh had sent him a list of medications to take. Priyanka advised Sushant to take various medications controlled under the Narcotics Drugs and Psychotropic Substances Act (NDPS Act), Rhea added in her complaint.

It seems that as per my discussion with the deceased at the time, he had informed his sister that he would not be able to obtain the said medication without a prescription Shockingly it has not come to light that his sister Priyanka had subsequently, on the same day, sent him a prescription by one Dr. Tarun Kumar, associate professor of cardiology from Dr. Ram Manohar Lohia hospital in New Delhi, the complaint read.

The accused have also been booked under Sections 8(1) i.e. prohibition of certain activities relating to property derived from the offense, 21 (punishment for contravention in relation to manufactured drugs and preparation), 22 (punishment for contravention in relation to psychotropic substances) and 29 (punishment for abetment and criminal conspiracy) of the NDPS Act.

However, as per the orders of the Honble Supreme Court, the case has been transferred to the Central Bureau of Investigation (CBI) for further investigation.

In response to the allegations, Sushants family lawyer Vikas Singh while challenging the legality of the complaint said that the actors family will tale serious action against it. He further said, I have been shown the FIR. The first thought which comes to my mind is that Bandra police station is her (Chakraborty) second home. The FIR lodged by the police is completely illegal and contempt of the orders of the Supreme Court.



Share this article:



Leave a feedback about this
TRENDING NEWS


TOP STORIES

wrong-bail-orders-alone-without-evidence-of-corruption-cannot-justify-removal-of-judicial-officer-sc
Trending Judiciary
Wrong Bail Orders Alone, Without Evidence of Corruption, Cannot Justify Removal of Judicial Officer: SC [Read Judgment]

Supreme Court rules that wrong bail orders alone cannot justify removal of a judicial officer without proof of corruption, misconduct, or extraneous considerations.

06 January, 2026 07:43 PM
divorced-muslim-woman-can-seek-maintenance-under-crpc-even-after-receiving-amount-under-muslim-women-protection-act-kerala-hc
Trending Judiciary
Divorced Muslim Woman Can Seek Maintenance Under CrPC Even After Receiving Amount Under Muslim Women Protection Act: Kerala HC [Read Order]

Kerala High Court holds that a divorced Muslim woman can claim maintenance under Section 125 CrPC even after receiving amounts under the 1986 Act.

06 January, 2026 08:19 PM
delhi-hc-full-bench-settles-bsf-seniority-dispute-rule-of-continuous-regular-appointment-prevails
Trending Judiciary
Delhi HC Full Bench Settles BSF Seniority Dispute; Rule of ‘Continuous Regular Appointment’ Prevails [Read Judgment]

Delhi High Court Full Bench rules BSF seniority is based on date of continuous regular appointment, rejecting claims for antedated seniority due to delayed joining.

06 January, 2026 08:45 PM
borrowers-cannot-invoke-writ-jurisdiction-to-compel-banks-to-extend-one-time-settlement-benefits-kerala-hc
Trending Judiciary
Borrowers Cannot Invoke Writ Jurisdiction to Compel Banks to Extend One-Time Settlement Benefits: Kerala HC [Read Judgment]

Kerala High Court holds borrowers cannot invoke writ jurisdiction to compel banks to grant One-Time Settlement benefits, as OTS is not a legal right.

07 January, 2026 09:22 PM

ADVERTISEMENT


Join Group

Signup for Our Newsletter

Get Exclusive access to members only content by email