38.6c New Delhi, India, Sunday, February 15, 2026
Top Stories Supreme Court
Political NEWS Legislative Corner Celebstreet International Videos
Subscribe Contact Us
close
CelebStreet

Non-Bailable Warrant Issued Against Choreographer Remo D'Souza

By LawStreet News Network      25 October, 2019 01:10 PM      0 Comments
Non-Bailable Warrant Issued Against Choreographer Remo D'Souza

A Ghaziabad court has issued a non-bailable warrant against Bollywood choreographer and filmmaker Remo D'Souza in connection with an alleged case of cheating and extortion.

The warrant was issued by additional chief judicial magistrate Mahendra Rawat after DSouza failed to appear before the court. 

SP (city) Manish Kumar Mishra said a police team would soon go to Mumbai to bring him to the city and permission for this has been sought from ADG (Meerut). 

The complainant, Satendra Tyagi, had alleged that DSouza made him invest Rs 5 crore in 2014 during the production of the film Death of Amar starring Rajeev Khandelwal and Zareen Khan, promising to return double the amount after its release. But later he failed to do so, he added.

Tyagi who owns a production house and came in contact with DSouza in Mumbai said that We developed a friendship. In 2013, he told me about his film. He asked me to invest Rs 5 crore and said I would get Rs 10 crore in a year. It has been over six years and I havent got anything. 

In his complaint, Tyagi also alleged that in December 2016, he started getting calls from the mafia threatening to kill him, following which he sought money from DSouza. I got calls from Prasad Pujari, who told me never to enter Mumbai again or else he would kill me.

An FIR under Sections 420 (cheating), 406 (criminal breach of trust) and 386 (extortion by putting a person in fear of death or grievous hurt) of Indian Penal Code, 1860, was registered against DSouza and Pujari at Sihani Gate police station on December 16, 2016. 

Tyagi alleged that DSouza and his associates started pressuring him to take back the case. On December 20, six-seven people sent by Pujari indiscriminately fired at me. Several bullets hit my car and damaged it. Despite several visits to police stations and senior police officials, my complaint was not registered. So I approached a local court, he said. 

A second FIR was then lodged against DSouza, Pujari and others under Indian Penal Code, 1860, sections, including rioting and attempt to murder, on July 27, 2018.

(Source TOI)



Share this article:

User Avatar
About:


Leave a feedback about this
TRENDING NEWS


TOP STORIES

resignation-on-medical-grounds-attracts-forfeiture-of-pension-service-madras-hc-full-bench
Trending Judiciary
Resignation on Medical Grounds Attracts Forfeiture of Pension Service: Madras HC Full Bench [Read Order]

Madras High Court Full Bench rules resignation on medical grounds leads to forfeiture of past service under Tamil Nadu Pension Rules, 1978.

09 February, 2026 12:16 PM
madras-hc-clarifies-section-37-of-ndps-act-not-applicable-to-acceptance-of-bond-for-appearance
Trending Judiciary
Madras HC Clarifies: Section 37 of NDPS Act Not Applicable to Acceptance of Bond for Appearance [Read Order]

Madras High Court says Section 37 NDPS Act doesn’t apply to acceptance of bond for appearance on summons, as it is distinct from grant of bail.

09 February, 2026 12:20 PM
sc-refers-matter-to-larger-bench-to-resolve-conflicting-judgments-on-third-partys-right-under-under-order-ix-rule-13-cpc
Trending Judiciary
SC Refers Matter To Larger Bench To Resolve Conflicting Judgments On Third Party’s Right Under Under Order IX Rule 13 CPC [Read Order]

Supreme Court refers the issue of third party rights under Order IX Rule 13 CPC to a larger bench to resolve conflicting judgments on ex parte decrees.

09 February, 2026 12:35 PM
bombay-sessions-court-grants-bail-in-193-crore-cyber-fraud-case-reaffirms-bail-is-rule-jail-is-exception
Trending Judiciary
Bombay Sessions Court Grants Bail in ₹1.93 Crore Cyber Fraud Case, Reaffirms ‘Bail Is Rule, Jail Is Exception’ [Read Order]

Bombay Sessions Court grants bail in ₹1.93 crore cyber fraud case, citing right to liberty as investigation is complete and accused not direct beneficiary.

09 February, 2026 04:17 PM

ADVERTISEMENT


Join Group

Signup for Our Newsletter

Get Exclusive access to members only content by email