38.6c New Delhi, India, Monday, June 17, 2024
CelebStreet

Promotional trailers of movie not a promise or offer: SC [Read Judgment]

By Jhanak Singh      23 April, 2024 03:01 PM      0 Comments
Promotional trailers of movie not a promise or offer SC

NEW DELHI: The Supreme Court on Monday ruled that promotional trailer of a movie is not a promise or offer and cannot be treated as enforceable under the law.

A bench of Justices P S Narasimha and Aravind Kumar said promotional trailers do not qualify as offers eliciting acceptance, and as such they do not transform into promises.

The bench also said the standard of service of arts must account for the creative element involved in such transactions.

The court said promotional trailer is unilateral and it is only meant to encourage a viewer to purchase the ticket to the movie, which is an independent transaction and contract from the promotional trailer.

Dealing with a plea by film producer Yash Raj Films Private Limited, the court quashed the National Consumer Disputes Redressal Commission's order.

The panel held that a consumer would feel deceived if a song that is shown in the promotional trailer is not played in the film, thereby would amount to an unfair trade practice.

A teacher from Aurangabad, Afreen Fatima Zaidi filed a consumer complaint claiming she went to watch a movie 'Fan' in 2016 due to a particular song in promotional trailer. However, it was not played out in the movie.

The bench, however, said a promotional trailer is an advertisement for a film.

"A promotional trailer by itself is not an offer and neither intends to nor can create a contractual relationship. Therefore, there is no offer, much less a contract, between the appellant and the complainant to the effect that the song contained in the trailer would be played in the movie and if not played, it will amount to deficiency in the service," the bench said.

The court said the transaction of service was only to enable the complainant to watch the movie upon the payment of consideration in the form of purchase of the movie ticket.

This transaction is unconnected to the promotional trailer, which by itself does not create any kind of right of claim with respect to the content of the movie, the bench added.

The bench said is a settled position of law that commercial speech, which includes advertisements, is protected through freedom of speech under Article 19(1)(a) of the Constitution, subject to the reasonable restrictions in Article 19(2).

The court also said it is also a settled position that commercial speech that is deceptive, unfair, misleading, and untruthful is excluded from such constitutional protection and can be regulated and prohibited by the State.

Subject to the restrictions, the producer or advertiser has the freedom to creatively and artistically promote his goods and services, the court said.

"An advertisement is not only informational but also a means of creative and artistic expression. It can allure, entice, capture the attention, and pique the interest of consumers through features that may not directly relate to information about the product or service," the bench said.

The court pointed out a song, dialogue, or a short visual in a promotional trailer may be seen in the context of the multifarious uses of advertisements. However, the kind of right or liability a promotional trailer creates would entirely depend on the civil and statutory legal regime, it added.

In the instant case, the bench said the deficiency alleged in the complaint arises out of the complainant’s own expectation that the song would be a part of the movie.

"It is assumed that there is deficiency of service as the movie did not contain the song. It is under this misplaced assumption that the subsequent formation of a contract to watch the movie is not in compliance with the promise allegedly made through the promotional trailer," the bench said.

In the case, the bench said the essential element of an ‘offer’ or ‘proposal’ for the formation of a contract has not been satisfied.

The court also held that the promotional trailer does not fall under any of the instances of “unfair method or unfair and deceptive practice”.

 

[Read Judgment]



Share this article:

About:

Jhanak is a lawyer by profession and legal journalist by passion. She graduated at the top of her cl...Read more

Follow:
FacebookTwitterLinkedinInstagram


Leave a feedback about this
Related Posts
View All

Ayodhya verdict: SC rules in favour of Ram Lalla, Sunni Waqf Board gets alternate land Ayodhya verdict: SC rules in favour of Ram Lalla, Sunni Waqf Board gets alternate land

SC bench led by CJI Ranjan Gogoi has allotted the dispute site to Ram Janmabhoomi Nyas, while directing the government to allot an alternate 5 acre land within Ayodhya to Sunni Waqf Board to build a mosque.

Supreme Court Top Panel Names Chief Justices for Bombay, Orissa and Meghalaya High Courts Supreme Court Top Panel Names Chief Justices for Bombay, Orissa and Meghalaya High Courts

The Orissa High Court has been without a permanent chief justice since January 5, 2020 after the retirement of former Chief Justice, KS Jhaveri. The high court is currently headed by acting Chief Justice Sanju Panda.

Himachal Pradesh High Court Grant Bail to a Man Accused of Committing Unnatural Acts with Cow, Said that there is no Criminal History Depicting Pervert Mind [READ ORDER] Himachal Pradesh High Court Grant Bail to a Man Accused of Committing Unnatural Acts with Cow, Said that there is no Criminal History Depicting Pervert Mind [READ ORDER]

without commenting on the merits of the case at this stage of investigation and the period of detention he faced in jail, the Court after analyzing all things allowed bail to the accused person ( Jai Ram). Himachal Pradesh High Court, Grant Bail, Justice Anup Chitrakara

How the Waqf Board has the third largest ownership of land after the Indian Railways and the Defense Dept.? How the Waqf Board has the third largest ownership of land after the Indian Railways and the Defense Dept.?

SHO Bhardwaj was quick to defend the Maulvi in questioning regarding the Mazar but harassed the reported who sought truth. Why did the SHO have to harass a Media reporter when he was doing his job? Who benefits from this? Why is there a Mazar on a flyover? Why is a Minority Welfare development Board in control of so much property? || #Mazar #SHOBhardwaj #Mazar #Mosque #WaqfBoard #Islam #News #Waqf #RemoveSHOBharadwaj

TRENDING NEWS


TOP STORIES

plea-filed-in-sc-for-fresh-neet
Trending Judiciary
Plea filed in SC for fresh NEET

Plea filed in Supreme Court seeks fresh NEET-UG 2024 exams due to alleged paper leaks and malpractices. Petitioners demand a Special Investigation Team and preventive measures.

11 June, 2024 10:49 AM
plant-30-trees-delhi-hc-orders-senior-citizen-accused-of-outraging-womans-modesty
Trending Judiciary
'Plant 30 trees', Delhi HC orders senior citizen accused of outraging woman's modesty

Plant 30 trees Delhi High Court orders senior citizen accused of outraging womans modesty

11 June, 2024 11:17 AM
no-liability-under-ni-act-for-dishonoured-cheques-of-merged-banks-presented-after-validity-period
Trending Judiciary
No liability under NI Act for dishonoured cheques of merged banks presented after validity period [Read Order]

Allahabad High Court rules that dishonoured cheques from merged banks presented after the validity period won't attract liability under Section 138 of the NI Act.

11 June, 2024 11:29 AM
modi-30-cabinet-full-list-of-ministers-and-their-respective-portfolios
Trending Executive
Modi 3.0 Cabinet: Full list of ministers and their respective portfolios

Modi 3.0 Cabinet: Amit Shah, S. Jaishankar, Nirmala Sitharaman, and Rajnath Singh retain key roles; allies TDP, JD(U), LJP, JD(S) secure major ministries.

11 June, 2024 03:11 PM

ADVERTISEMENT


Join Group

Signup for Our Newsletter

Get Exclusive access to members only content by email