38.6c New Delhi, India, Thursday, January 15, 2026
Top Stories Supreme Court
Political NEWS Legislative Corner Celebstreet International Videos
Subscribe Contact Us
close
CelebStreet

All you need to know about the bail granted to Rhea Chakraborty in the NDPS case related to SSRs demise [Read Order]

By Meghna Mishra      08 October, 2020 01:22 PM      0 Comments
Rhea Chakraborty NDPS Bail Granted

A single-judge bench of Honble Justice SV Kotwal of the Bombay High Court has granted bail to Rhea Chakraborty, Dipesh Sawant, and Samuel Miranda in the case that was registered under various sections of the Narcotics Drugs and Psychotropic Substances (NDPS) Act,1985 by the NCB. This case by the NCB was in relation to the demise of late actor Sushant Singh Rajput.

There were two more accused in the NDPS case whose bail has been rejected. The bail applications of Rhea Chakrabortys brother Showik Chakraborty and Abdul Parihar was rejected.

The bail application of Rhea Chakraborty was subject to a PR Bond of INR 1,00,000 among other stipulated conditions. Another condition attached to her bail application is that she appears in the nearest police station every day for 10 days after being released on bail. According to her approved bail, the Bollywood actress is restricted from leaving the country.

The other accused whose bail application was approved i.e. Dipesh Sawant and Samuel Miranda have to agree to pay a PR Bond of INR 50,000 each. The passports of the accused have been impounded as well.

ASG Anil Singh appeared for the NCB. The learned counsel for the NCB requested a stay on the orders operation but his request was rejected. 

The counsel appearing for Rhea Chakraborty, Advocate Satish Maneshindes request for 1 month of time to furnish the bail bond of INR 1,00,000 was approved by the court. Rhea Chakraborty, Showik Chakraborty, Abdel Basit Parihar, Samuel Miranda, and Dipesh Sawant had filed for bail before the Bombay High Court after the Special NDPS Court in Mumbai rejected their bail plea.

The Chakraborty siblings and the other accused were filed for procuring drugs for the consumption of Late actor SSR. On September 29, 2020, Honble Justice Kotwal heard all the 5 bail applications together beyond the usual working hours of the court. 

The counsels for the accused Advocates Satish Maneshinde, Tariq Sayed, Subodh Desai, and Rajendra Rathod contented the following reasons for the grant of bail:

1. The Narcotics Crimes Bureau (NCB) had no jurisdiction to investigate in this matter because of the Supreme Court order of August 19, 2020, to hand over all investigations pertaining to the death of actor Sushant Singh Rajput to the CBI.

2. Even if NCB had jurisdiction, the offences that were charged on the accused were of a bailable nature. On this aspect, the counsel added that the quantities of the substance allegedly involved in the matter were small, and not commercial.

3. The charges against the accused under Section 27A of the NDPS Act were not made out with supporting evidence. 

On being arrested by the NCB for the offences alleged under the NDPS Act, 1985, the accused made a remand application for judicial custody. The Additional Chief Metropolitan Magistrate at the Esplanade Court granted 14 days of judicial custody over the accused.

After the refusal of bail from the Special NDPS Court, the accused filed individual bail applications submitting 51 grounds for seeking bail before the Bombay High Court.

 

[Read Order]



Share this article:



Leave a feedback about this
TRENDING NEWS


TOP STORIES

indias-business-families-seek-regulatory-recognition-of-daughters-in-law-as-relatives-under-sebi-takeover-norms
Trending Business
India’s Business Families Seek Regulatory Recognition of Daughters-in-Law as ‘Relatives’ Under SEBI Takeover Norms

Indian business families urge SEBI to recognise daughters-in-law as relatives under takeover norms, citing succession planning, trusts, gender equality and compliance risks.

09 January, 2026 05:58 PM
sc-bail-for-accused-added-under-section-319-crpc-requires-strong-and-cogent-evidence-not-mere-probability-of-complicity
Trending Judiciary
SC: Bail for Accused Added Under Section 319 CrPC Requires Strong and Cogent Evidence, Not Mere Probability of Complicity [Read Order]

Supreme Court rules that bail for accused added under Section 319 CrPC requires strong and cogent evidence, not mere probability of complicity.

09 January, 2026 06:04 PM
pre-deposit-under-sarfaesi-act-must-be-made-before-drat-not-before-bank-kerala-hc
Trending Judiciary
Pre-deposit Under SARFAESI Act Must Be Made Before DRAT, Not Before Bank: Kerala HC [Read Judgment]

Kerala HC holds SARFAESI pre-deposit must be made before DRAT, not the bank, and writ petitions are not maintainable when a statutory appellate remedy exists.

09 January, 2026 07:08 PM
auction-authority-cannot-cancel-highest-bid-to-seek-better-price-in-fresh-auction-sc
Trending Judiciary
Auction Authority Cannot Cancel Highest Bid to Seek Better Price in Fresh Auction: SC [Read Judgment]

Supreme Court rules auction authorities cannot cancel a valid highest bid merely to seek higher prices in a fresh auction, calling such action arbitrary and illegal.

09 January, 2026 07:25 PM

ADVERTISEMENT


Join Group

Signup for Our Newsletter

Get Exclusive access to members only content by email