38.6c New Delhi, India, Monday, January 12, 2026
Top Stories Supreme Court
Political NEWS Legislative Corner Celebstreet International Videos
Subscribe Contact Us
close
CelebStreet

Rhea Chakraborty moves SC for transfer of FIR from Patna to Mumbai

By Prachi Misra      30 July, 2020 02:53 PM      0 Comments
Rhea Chakraborty SC FIR Sushant Singh Rajput

On Wednesday, 29th July 2020 Bollywood actress Rhea Chakraborty moved the SC for the transfer of the FIR from Patna to Mumbai and the stay on the investigation by the Bihar Police on the allegations of Sushant Singh Rajputs father that she abetted the suicide of his actor son.

On 14th June Rajput at 34, hanged himself at his Mumbai Apartment in Bandra and since then police have been probing the case keeping in mind various angles.

The four-member probe team of Bihar police is already in Mumbai and may seek to interrogate the actress. The FIR lodged at Patna by Rajputs father, KK Singh, contained allegations of severe criminal offenses such as abetment of suicide and criminal breach of trust under the IPC.

Advocate Satish Maneshinde is representing Chakraborty, he has filed a petition in the apex court seeking transfer of the case from Patna to Mumbai where the probe in the death case of actor Sushant Singh Rajput is going on.

Maneshinde said Chakroborty has also sought a stay on the probe by Bihar Police on the FIR lodged by Rajputs father till the disposal of her plea in the top court. 

After four days of actor Rajputs death, his father KK Singh lodged a FIR at Rajiv Nagar Police station in Patna against Chakraborty and six others, including her family members, accusing them of abetting the actors suicide.

Mumbai police have been questioning various producers and directors like Mahesh Bhatt, Sanjay Leela Bhansali, Aditya Chopra, and others to know the reasons behind the untimely demise of the 34-year-old Rajput, which suddenly took a turn after Rajputs father lodging the FIR against his rumoured actor girlfriend Rhea and six others.

Rhea has recorded her statement with the Mumbai Police.

Singh, On 25th July 2020 lodged the FIR under various sections of IPC including 306 (abetment of suicide), 341 (punishment for wrongful restraint), 342 (punishment for wrongful confinement), 380 (theft in dwelling house), 406 (punishment for criminal breach of trust) and 420 (cheating and dishonestly including the delivery of property.)

Several political facilities and leaders and film personalities have demanded a CBI probe into his demise.

Rajputs death has also questioned nepotism and favouritism in the Hindi film industry. Several top production houses boycotted the actor causing him to end his life.

 



Share this article:



Leave a feedback about this
TRENDING NEWS


TOP STORIES

wrong-bail-orders-alone-without-evidence-of-corruption-cannot-justify-removal-of-judicial-officer-sc
Trending Judiciary
Wrong Bail Orders Alone, Without Evidence of Corruption, Cannot Justify Removal of Judicial Officer: SC [Read Judgment]

Supreme Court rules that wrong bail orders alone cannot justify removal of a judicial officer without proof of corruption, misconduct, or extraneous considerations.

06 January, 2026 07:43 PM
divorced-muslim-woman-can-seek-maintenance-under-crpc-even-after-receiving-amount-under-muslim-women-protection-act-kerala-hc
Trending Judiciary
Divorced Muslim Woman Can Seek Maintenance Under CrPC Even After Receiving Amount Under Muslim Women Protection Act: Kerala HC [Read Order]

Kerala High Court holds that a divorced Muslim woman can claim maintenance under Section 125 CrPC even after receiving amounts under the 1986 Act.

06 January, 2026 08:19 PM
delhi-hc-full-bench-settles-bsf-seniority-dispute-rule-of-continuous-regular-appointment-prevails
Trending Judiciary
Delhi HC Full Bench Settles BSF Seniority Dispute; Rule of ‘Continuous Regular Appointment’ Prevails [Read Judgment]

Delhi High Court Full Bench rules BSF seniority is based on date of continuous regular appointment, rejecting claims for antedated seniority due to delayed joining.

06 January, 2026 08:45 PM
borrowers-cannot-invoke-writ-jurisdiction-to-compel-banks-to-extend-one-time-settlement-benefits-kerala-hc
Trending Judiciary
Borrowers Cannot Invoke Writ Jurisdiction to Compel Banks to Extend One-Time Settlement Benefits: Kerala HC [Read Judgment]

Kerala High Court holds borrowers cannot invoke writ jurisdiction to compel banks to grant One-Time Settlement benefits, as OTS is not a legal right.

07 January, 2026 09:22 PM

ADVERTISEMENT


Join Group

Signup for Our Newsletter

Get Exclusive access to members only content by email