New Delhi, India  
CelebStreet

Complaint against Sunny Leone and others for actors new song Madhuban mein Radhika Naache

By Dolly Chhabda      28 December, 2021 02:34 PM      0 Comments
Complaint against Sunny Leone and others for actors new song Madhuban mein Radhika Naache

A complaint has been filed with the Delhi police against Sunny Leone and the makers of the song under IPC sections 295,298,505,34 and Section 67 of the IT Act.

Ever since its release, Bollywood actor Sunny Leone's latest song, "Madhuban mein Radhika naache" was released on Wednesday (December 22). The song, which has been composed by Shaarib and Toshi, did not go down too well with the netizens. Soon after the song was launched on YouTube it started facing backlash on social media platforms. The users slammed the makers and the actress for hurting the sentiments of the Hindu religion. Some of the users also demanded the complete ban of the song. As it has been at the hub of controversy for 'hurting religious sentiments. A remake of the classic by Mohammed Rafi, the music video featuring Leone doing 'sensual' moves has led to several raising objections to it. 

On Sunday (December 26), a complaint was filed with the Delhi police against Leone, lyricist Manoj Yadav and makers of the song under IPC sections 295,298,505,34 and Section 67 of the IT Act. Several of these sections are non-bailable offences. Here is a breakdown of what the law states, and what punishment the sections entail.  

Non-bailable offences

Sections 295- Injuring or defiling place of worship with intent to insult the religion of any class - This section is applied if a person destroys, damages or defiles any place of worship or any object held sacred by any class of persons with the intention of thereby 'insulting the religion'. This section is punishable with imprisonment up to two years, a fine, or both.

Section 298- Uttering words with deliberate intent to wound the religious feelings of any person - This section is applied if a person, with the deliberate intention of wounding the religious feelings of any person, utters any word or makes any sound in the hearing of that person or makes any gesture in the sight of that person or places. He/she can be punished with imprisonment of up to one year, with fine, or both.

Section 505- Statements conducing to public mischief- Section (C) of 505 is applied when there is an intent to incite, or which is likely to incite, any class or community of persons to commit any offence against any other class or community. Accused can be punished with imprisonment which may extend to three years, fine, or with both.

Others

Section 34- Acts done by several persons in furtherance of common intention- When a criminal act is done by several persons in furtherance of the common intention of all, each of such persons is liable for that act in the same manner. Since punishment is not defined in this section, it is neither bailable nor non-bailable. 

Section 67 of IT Act- Punishment for publishing or transmitting obscene material in electronic form - Whoever publishes or transmits or causes to be published or transmitted in the electronic form, any material which is lascivious or appeals to the prurient interest, shall be punished on first conviction with imprisonment up to three years with fine which may extend to five lakh rupees.



Share this article:



Leave a feedback about this
TRENDING NEWS

writ-courts-cannot-examine-merits-in-section-16-arbitration-challenges-sc
Trending Judiciary
Writ Courts Cannot Examine Merits in Section 16 Arbitration Challenges: SC [Read Judgment]

Supreme Court rules writ courts cannot examine merits while reviewing Section 16 arbitration orders; stamping objections can be raised under Section 34.

30 May, 2026 11:37 AM
god-wont-wait-for-ministers-madras-hc-questions-vip-darshan-system
Trending Judiciary
“God Won’t Wait For Ministers”: Madras HC Questions VIP Darshan System

Madras High Court questions VIP darshan in temples, saying all are equal before God, and hears PIL seeking abolition of paid and preferential access.

30 May, 2026 11:55 AM

TOP STORIES

can-a-testator-legally-disinherit-his-wife-and-children-in-favour-of-a-sibling-sc-answers
Trending Judiciary
Can A Testator Legally Disinherit His Wife And Children In Favour Of A Sibling ? SC Answers [Read Judgment]

Supreme Court holds that excluding a wife and children from a Will in favour of a sibling is not by itself a suspicious circumstance.

25 May, 2026 01:07 PM
petition-filed-in-supreme-court-seeks-cbi-probe-into-fake-law-degrees-and-the-cockroach-janta-party-campaign
Trending Judiciary
Petition Filed in Supreme Court Seeks CBI Probe into Fake Law Degrees and the ‘Cockroach Janta Party’ Campaign

Petition in Supreme Court seeks CBI probe into fake law degrees and the “Cockroach Janta Party” campaign over CJI Surya Kant’s remarks.

25 May, 2026 02:15 PM
jharkhand-hc-takes-suo-motu-cognisance-of-alleged-sexual-assault-of-female-inmate-by-jail-superintendent
Trending Judiciary
Jharkhand HC Takes Suo Motu Cognisance of Alleged Sexual Assault of Female Inmate by Jail Superintendent [Read Order]

Jharkhand High Court takes suo motu cognisance of alleged sexual assault of female inmate by jail superintendent at Ranchi jail.

25 May, 2026 02:39 PM
delhi-hc-stays-coercive-action-against-indigo-in-rs-458-crore-gst-compensation-dispute
Trending Business
Delhi HC Stays Coercive Action Against IndiGo In Rs. 458 Crore GST Compensation Dispute [Read Order]

Delhi High Court protected IndiGo from coercive action in a Rs. 458 crore GST dispute over compensation received from a foreign engine supplier.

26 May, 2026 01:31 PM

ADVERTISEMENT


Join Group

Signup for Our Newsletter

Get Exclusive access to members only content by email