38.6c New Delhi, India, Saturday, August 16, 2025
Top Stories Supreme Court
Political NEWS Legislative Corner Celebstreet International Videos
Subscribe Contact Us
close
CelebStreet

Everyone has an opinion about High Profile Cases, but we will proceed as per Law: SC states while refusing a stay on investigation against Rhea Chakraborty

By LAWSTREET NEWS NETWORK      05 August, 2020 09:56 PM      0 Comments
Everyone has an opinion about High Profile Cases, but we will proceed as per Law: SC states while refusing a stay on investigation against Rhea Chakraborty

Amidst the ongoing tension in the sensational matter of the unfortunate demise of Sushant Singh Rajput, today  (August 5,2020), the Supreme Court has dismissed the Bollywood actress Rhea Chakraborty's plea seeking a stay on the investigation by the Bihar police against serious allegations of abetting suicide and fraud by Sushant Singh Rajput's father. The bench is headed by Justice Hrishikesh Roy.

The bench has refused the stay on the probe by the Bihar Police against the actress stating that,

Serious allegations have been leveled against PetitionerRajput was a talented artist who passed away under unusual circumstances. Now whether there is criminality involved needs to be investigated

The actress had approached the Supreme Court after a team of Bihar Police came to Mumbai to investigate and interrogate Rhea against an FIR lodged by Sushants father including serious criminal charges of abetting the suicide, cheating, and fraud.

In her plea, filed through the Sr. Adv. Shyam Divan, the actress has sought transfer of an FIR, lodged against her in connection with the death of actor Sushant Singh Rajput, from Patna to Mumbai and stay on the investigation by the Bihar Police. She has even alleged that the charges involving - abetment of suicide and cheating against her is part of a conspiracy between the Bihar Police and the actors father. The Senior Advocate said that, since the whole incident happened in Mumbai, immediately after Sushant's death, Mumbai Police started the investigation and questioned about 56 people, so the responsibility of investigation is with Mumbai Police.

In response to the application filed by Rhea, Sr. Adv. Vikas Singh on behalf of Sushants father argued that since there has been no complaint registered in Maharashtra, therefore, as per section 174 of the CrPC, only Bihar Police has the authority to investigate in the present matter. He even mentioned the suspicion that the Maharashtra Police might as well destroying evidence in the case.

On July 25, the Bihar Police had registered an FIR for an investigation against the complaint lodged by Sushants father alleging Rhea Chakraborty for abetment of suicide, cheating, and criminal breach of trust under the IPC. The police have booked Rhea under Sections 341, 342, 380, 406, 420, 306, 506, and 120(B) of the Indian Penal Code for the investigation.

The Supreme Court has directed Mumbai Police to file a status report on probe conducted so far in the Sushant Singh Rajput death case. The Supreme Court has asked all the concerned to file their replies in the meantime. 

Meanwhile, the Centre today has accepted Bihar Chief Minister Nitish Kumar's recommendation for a CBI probe into the untimely death of Sushant at the request of his father, Krishna Kishore Singh. SG Tushar Mehta on behalf of the Centre has submitted that the notification for the CBI probe in the matter will be released by the end of the day.

According to a tweet posted by PTI, the Supreme court has said that whatever may be the present course of the Sushant Singh Rajput death case, the truth shall ultimately prevail.



Share this article:

About:

Explore Comprehensive Legal Reporting with LawStreet Journal: Your Go-To Source for Supreme Court an...Read more

Follow:
TwitterLinkedinInstagram


Leave a feedback about this
TRENDING NEWS


TOP STORIES

sc-declines-to-interfere-with-patkars-conviction-in-defamation-case
Trending Judiciary
SC declines to interfere with Patkar's conviction in defamation case

SC refuses to interfere with Medha Patkar’s conviction in 2001 defamation case filed by Delhi L-G V K Saxena, but sets aside ₹1 lakh penalty imposed on her.

11 August, 2025 02:29 PM
sc-directs-for-removing-stray-dogs-in-delhi-ncr
Trending Judiciary
SC directs for removing stray dogs in Delhi NCR

SC orders removal of all stray dogs in Delhi-NCR within 8 weeks, to be housed in shelters; warns against obstruction amid rising rabies, dog-bite cases.

11 August, 2025 06:42 PM
hc-judges-in-no-way-inferior-to-sc-judges-sc
Trending Judiciary
HC judges in no way inferior to SC judges: SC

SC affirms HC judges are equal in stature to SC judges; directs apology for unfounded allegations against Telangana HC judge.

12 August, 2025 12:14 PM
law-does-not-require-to-provide-separate-list-of-electors-not-included-in-draft-rolls
Trending Judiciary
Law does not require to provide separate list of electors not included in draft rolls, EC tells SC

EC tells SC no legal mandate to publish separate list or reasons for voters excluded from draft rolls; affected persons can file claims under Form 6.

12 August, 2025 12:33 PM

ADVERTISEMENT


Join Group

Signup for Our Newsletter

Get Exclusive access to members only content by email