38.6c New Delhi, India, Tuesday, August 05, 2025
Top Stories Supreme Court
Political NEWS Legislative Corner Celebstreet International Videos
Subscribe Contact Us
close
CelebStreet

Supreme Court Refuses to Stay OTT Release of 'Why I killed Gandhi'

By LawStreet News Network      31 January, 2022 04:32 PM      0 Comments
Supreme Court OTT Release Why I killed Gandhi

The Supreme Court refused a stay on the release of the film 'Why I Killed Gandhi' on the over-the-top (OTT) platform 'Limelight' on Monday [Sikander Behl v. Union of India].

A Bench headed by Justice Indira Banerjee said that a petition under Article 32 cannot be entertained as there is no violation of the fundamental rights of the petitioner due to the release of the movie.

However, the petitioner would be at liberty to approach the concerned High Court, the Supreme Court clarified.

"A writ petition under Art 32 may only be filed when there is question of violation of fundamental right. There is no fundamental right of the petitioner which appears to have been violated. Thus this plea cannot be entertained. However, it appears that the petitioner is a citizen may have a serious cause of concern here. Petitioner is at liberty to approach the High court under Article 226," the Court said.

According to a petition filed by Sikandar Behl through lawyer Anuj Bhandari, the film aims to malign and damage the image of the Father of the Nation by glorifying Nathuram Godse and celebrating his murder of Mahatma Gandhi.

The film is intended to sow discord among communities, incite hatred, and disrupt tranquilly, according to the petition.

It further stated that the film had not been cleared by the censor board and that it will be released on the OTT platform 'Limelight' on January 30.

The film was made in 2017 but never saw the light of day. Amol Kolhe, the head of the Nationalist Congress Party (NCP) and a Member of Parliament (MP), is playing Godse in the film.

The petitioner also requested that OTT platforms be regulated, as they are currently outside of the censor board's jurisdiction, and unregulated and uncensored content is being published on a variety of OTT platforms.



Share this article:

User Avatar
About:


Leave a feedback about this
TRENDING NEWS

bengaluru-court-convicts-ex-mp-prajwal-revanna-in-rape-case
Trending Judiciary
Bengaluru court convicts ex MP Prajwal Revanna in rape case

Bengaluru court convicts ex-MP Prajwal Revanna in rape case linked to explicit videos; one of four sexual abuse cases filed against him.

04 August, 2025 11:07 AM
sc-sets-aside-order-declaring-man-as-juvenile-on-basis-of-school-certificate
Trending Judiciary
SC sets aside order declaring man as juvenile on basis of school certificate [Read Judgment]

SC: School certificate from private school not valid proof of age, sets aside order declaring murder accused as juvenile.

04 August, 2025 11:24 AM

TOP STORIES

a-new-dawn-in-indias-criminal-justice-system-replacing-colonial-shackles-with-indigenous-legal-reforms
Trending Vantage Points
A New Dawn in India’s Criminal Justice System: Replacing Colonial Shackles with Indigenous Legal Reforms

This research paper examines India’s transition from IPC, CrPC, and IEA to BNS, BNSS, and BSA, emphasizing victim-centric and technology-driven justice reforms.

30 July, 2025 12:41 PM
your-conduct-does-not-inspire-confidence-sc-reserves-judgment-on-justice-yashwant-varmas-plea
Trending Judiciary
‘Your Conduct Does Not Inspire Confidence’: SC Reserves Judgment on Justice Yashwant Varma’s Plea

CJI can recommend removal of a judge in cases of grave misconduct, SC says; clarifies CJI isn’t a mere post office & Parliament has final say.

30 July, 2025 04:14 PM
cricket-stadium-would-be-required-sc-slams-tn-govt-again-for-roping-2000-accused-500-witnesses
Trending Judiciary
'Cricket stadium would be required,' SC slams TN govt again for roping 2000 accused, 500 witnesses in trial against Senthil Balaji

SC slams TN govt for implicating 2,000 accused & 500 witnesses in Senthil Balaji cash-for-jobs case, says trial needs a cricket stadium to fit all.

30 July, 2025 05:20 PM
accident-on-way-to-office-and-return-to-be-covered-for-compensation-under-ec-act-sc
Trending Judiciary
Accident on way to office and return to be covered for compensation under EC Act: SC [Read Judgment]

SC: Accidents while commuting to and from work covered under Employees’ Compensation Act, 1923; ruling gives retrospective effect to benefit employees.

30 July, 2025 05:28 PM

ADVERTISEMENT


Join Group

Signup for Our Newsletter

Get Exclusive access to members only content by email