38.6c New Delhi, India, Tuesday, March 31, 2026
Top Stories Supreme Court
Political NEWS Legislative Corner Celebstreet International Videos
Subscribe Contact Us
close
Crime, Police And Law

Bondi Beach Shooting: Telangana Police Confirm Hyderabad Origin of Deceased Accused

By Tushit Pandey      17 December, 2025 09:35 PM      0 Comments
Bondi Beach Shooting Telangana Police Confirm Hyderabad Origin of Deceased Accused

Hyderabad: Telangana Police have formally confirmed that Sajid Akram, one of the two perpetrators involved in the mass shooting at Bondi Beach, Sydney, was originally from Hyderabad, India. The confirmation clarifies his background and addresses public speculation following the December 14 incident that left 15 people dead during a public Hanukkah celebration.

The confirmation was issued through an official press note after coordination with Australian authorities. Police officials emphasised that while the deceased accused had historical ties to Hyderabad, there is no evidence of radicalisation, criminal activity, or any operational linkage connected to India or Telangana.

According to the press note, the attack occurred on Sunday, December 14, 2025, at Bondi Beach, Sydney, during a public Hanukkah event where a large number of civilians were gathered. The shooting resulted in the death of 15 civilians, while one of the two attackers was also killed during police action. Australian law enforcement agencies have treated the incident as a terrorist attack, and the investigation is being led by Australian police and counter-terrorism authorities. The attackers were identified as Sajid Akram (50) and his son, Naveed Akram (24).

Reports cited in the press note indicate that the perpetrators were inspired by extremist ideology, and further investigation into the ideological motivation and operational planning is ongoing under Australian jurisdiction.

Migration History and Police Verification

Telangana Police confirmed that Sajid Akram was born and raised in Hyderabad, where he completed his Bachelor of Commerce (B.Com) degree. He migrated to Australia in November 1998, approximately 27 years ago, in search of employment, and subsequently settled there permanently.

He later married Ms. Venerra Grosso, a woman of European origin. The couple had two children—a son, Naveed Akram, who was among the attackers, and a daughter. As per official records:

  • Sajid Akram continues to hold an Indian passport
  • His son and daughter were born in Australia and are Australian citizens
  • Sajid Akram had limited contact with his extended family in Hyderabad over the past 27 years

Police records further show that he visited India on six occasions after migrating, primarily for family-related reasons, including property matters and visits to elderly parents. Authorities noted that he did not travel to India even at the time of his father’s death, indicating minimal engagement with his place of origin in later years.

The press note clearly states that family members in Hyderabad expressed no knowledge of Sajid Akram’s alleged radical mindset or extremist activities. They also reported being unaware of any circumstances that could have contributed to his radicalisation. Crucially, Telangana Police stated that:

  • There is no evidence linking the radicalisation of Sajid Akram or his son to India
  • No local influence, organisation, or individual in Telangana is connected to the incident
  • The factors leading to radicalisation appear to have developed outside India

Additionally, Telangana Police confirmed that no adverse criminal record exists against Sajid Akram during his residence in India prior to his departure in 1998. No cases, intelligence inputs, or surveillance records were found linking him to unlawful or extremist activity during his stay in Hyderabad.

Inter-Agency Cooperation and Legal Position

The Telangana Police stated that they are fully cooperating with central agencies and international counterparts, including Australian authorities, in accordance with established legal and diplomatic frameworks. Officials urged media organisations and the public to avoid speculation or attribution without verified facts, particularly in cases of international terrorism involving historical personal origins but no operational connection.

From a legal standpoint, the case remains under Australian jurisdiction, with all criminal liability, prosecution, and counter-terrorism proceedings being handled under Australian law. Indian authorities’ involvement is limited to background verification and information sharing, as mandated by international cooperation protocols.

The official clarification by Telangana Police places the Hyderabad connection in its proper legal and factual context—confirming origin while firmly ruling out any local, ideological, or operational link to India. Authorities reiterated that the tragic events at Bondi Beach must be addressed through verified evidence and due legal process, without conflating geography of origin with responsibility or influence.

The investigation into the attack continues in Australia, while Indian authorities remain engaged solely for factual cooperation, as required.



Share this article:

About:

Tushit is a political science scholar with a strong academic foundation and a growing interest in re...Read more



Leave a feedback about this
Related Posts
View All

Bondi Beach Shooting: Telangana Police Confirm Hyderabad Origin of Deceased Accused Bondi Beach Shooting: Telangana Police Confirm Hyderabad Origin of Deceased Accused

Telangana Police confirm Bondi Beach shooter Sajid Akram’s Hyderabad origin, ruling out any radical, operational, or ideological links to India.

TRENDING NEWS

wifes-domestic-violence-complaint-filed-after-divorce-petition-amounts-to-fresh-cruelty-condonation-cannot-bar-relief-madras-hc
Trending Judiciary
Wife’s Domestic Violence Complaint Filed After Divorce Petition Amounts to Fresh Cruelty; Condonation Cannot Bar Relief: Madras HC [Read Judgment]

Madras HC grants divorce, holds wife’s post-petition DV complaint amounts to fresh cruelty; condonation cannot bar relief.

30 March, 2026 05:15 PM
daughter-in-law-not-legally-obligated-to-maintain-parents-in-law-allahabad-hc
Trending Judiciary
Daughter-in-Law Not Legally Obligated to Maintain Parents-in-Law: Allahabad HC [Read Order]

Allahabad High Court rules daughter-in-law not liable to maintain parents-in-law under BNSS; moral obligation not legally enforceable.

30 March, 2026 05:49 PM

TOP STORIES

privacy-vs-prohibition-sc-to-examine-legality-of-breathalyser-based-enforcement-in-bihar
Trending Judiciary
Privacy vs Prohibition: SC to Examine Legality of Breathalyser-Based Enforcement in Bihar

Supreme Court to examine legality of breathalyser tests under Bihar Prohibition law, raising key issues on privacy, evidence, and Article 21 rights.

25 March, 2026 06:14 PM
sc-reverses-high-court-acquittal-in-child-rape-case-directs-all-high-courts-to-strictly-follow-ban-on-disclosure-of-victims-identity
Trending Judiciary
SC Reverses High Court Acquittal In Child Rape Case; Directs All High Courts To Strictly Follow Ban On Disclosure Of Victim’s Identity [Read Judgment]

SC restores conviction in child rape case, reverses acquittal, and directs strict compliance with law prohibiting disclosure of victim identity.

26 March, 2026 02:05 PM
allahabad-hc-grants-anticipatory-bail-to-swami-avimukteshwaranand-saraswati-in-pocso-case-rules-section-29-presumption-not-applicable-at-pre-arrest-stage
Trending Judiciary
Allahabad HC Grants Anticipatory Bail to Swami Avimukteshwaranand Saraswati in POCSO Case, Rules Section 29 Presumption Not Applicable at Pre-Arrest Stage [Read Order]

Allahabad High Court grants anticipatory bail to Swami Avimukteshwaranand Saraswati, rules Section 29 POCSO presumption not applicable at pre-arrest stage.

26 March, 2026 02:25 PM
karnataka-hc-quashes-fir-against-sri-sri-ravi-shankar-in-bengaluru-land-encroachment-case
Trending Judiciary
Karnataka HC Quashes FIR Against Sri Sri Ravi Shankar In Bengaluru Land Encroachment Case

Karnataka HC quashes FIR against Sri Sri Ravi Shankar in Bengaluru land encroachment case, holding no direct role and limiting relief to him alone.

26 March, 2026 03:00 PM

ADVERTISEMENT


Join Group

Signup for Our Newsletter

Get Exclusive access to members only content by email