38.6c New Delhi, India, Wednesday, May 29, 2024
Crime, Police And Law

State has no locus to file petition: CBI to Bombay HC plea challenging parts of FIR against Anil Deshmukh

By Pariyal Gupta      12 June, 2021 02:14 PM      0 Comments
State has no locus to file petition: CBI to Bombay HC plea challenging parts of FIR against Anil Deshmukh

The Central Bureau of Investigation (CBI) on Thursday (June 10, 2021) raised objections to the plea filed in the Bombay High Court by the Maharashtra Government challenging certain portions of the First Information Report (FIR) registered against former State Home Minister Anil Deshmukh. 

The objections raised are against the FIR which was registered by CBI against Deshmukh after the Bombay High Court had permitted inquiry on April 5, in a petition filed by Param Bir Singh, former Commissioner of Mumbai Police.

The petition filed seeks to quash portions of the FIR that pertains to reinstating suspended assistant police inspector Sachin Vaze and the transfer of other police officers. It is also alleged in the plea that the FIR was an attempt to destabilize the Maha Vikas Aghadi Government.

Advocate Jayanti Patil, who claims that her complaint to the Malabar Hill Police formed the basis of CBI FIR, raised objections on the maintainability of the petition. 

Patil added that Sachin Vaze, the police officer whose reinstatement the FIR seeks to probe is a necessary party to the petition and ought to be added as a party and that the State is suo moto working on his behalf.

In furtherance to the objection of maintainability raised by Patil, Solicitor General Tushar Mehta, appearing on behalf of CBI submitted that “State has no locus to file this petition. If a petition should have been filed, it should have been filed by an accused”.

Mehta then stated that the Maharashtra Government could not file this petition under Section 482 of the Code of Criminal Procedure (CrPC) on the ground that it pre-empted an investigation by CBI against some individual. 

In reply, Senior Advocate Rafique Dada, appearing on behalf of the State Government submitted that the information sought by CBI to investigate the case involved documents and digital evidence which were in no manner within the scope of the inquiry permitted by the Court.

He further contended that the CBI could not investigate matters in any state without its consent, as a result of which it could not conduct an investigation and file an FIR in the matter without the consent of the State of Maharashtra. 

He also requested the Court to direct Advocate Patil to file a proper intervention pleading before the Court so that the State can respond to the averments.

Acknowledging the request, Patil made a statement to the Court that she would do so by Monday (June 14).

The division bench of Justice S.S Shinde and N.J Jamadar directed the parties to complete their pleadings by June 16. 

CBI agreed to the Court’s direction to not act on the letters asking the Maharashtra Government to produce certain documents related to its investigation against Deshmukh till the next date of hearing. 

The matter will be heard on June 18. 

Share this article:

Leave a feedback about this

Trending Business
Battle Over Butter Chicken: Moti Mahal Takes Daryaganj to Court in Trademark Showdown

Moti Mahal and Daryaganj restaurants clash in Delhi High Court over trademark claims, each asserting they invented Butter Chicken and Dal Makhani.

28 May, 2024 11:33 AM
Trending Judiciary
Punjab and Haryana High Court Upholds ED's Arrest of AAP MLA, Dismisses Plea Challenging Detention [Read Order]

Punjab and Haryana High Court dismisses AAP MLA Jaswant Singh's plea against his ED arrest, ruling it was in line with Section 19(1) of the PMLA.

28 May, 2024 11:56 AM


Trending Judiciary
No legal mandate for uploading of Form 17C on website or handing over to anyone other than candidate or agent, EC tells SC

EC tells SC there's no legal mandate to upload Form 17C on websites or provide it to anyone other than candidates or agents, citing risks of misuse and mistrust.

23 May, 2024 11:28 AM
Trending Judiciary
'National security always paramount,' SC cancels bail of PFI members [Read Judgment]

SC emphasizes national security, cancels bail of eight PFI members, stressing balance between civil liberties and counter-terrorism under UAPA.

23 May, 2024 12:05 PM
Trending Judiciary
Calcutta HC Invalidates Five Lakh OBC Certificates Issued After 2010, Cites Unconstitutional Grounds [Read Judgment]

Calcutta High Court invalidates OBC certificates issued after 2010, declaring them unconstitutional. Court cites undue haste and procedural impropriety.

23 May, 2024 03:33 PM
Trending Judiciary
MP High Court Grants Police Protection to Couple Facing Honour Killing Threats over Marriage [Read Order]

MP High Court grants police protection to a couple facing death threats from their parents for marrying without consent, citing serious measures against honor killings.

23 May, 2024 03:45 PM


Join Group

Signup for Our Newsletter

Get Exclusive access to members only content by email