38.6c New Delhi, India, Thursday, February 12, 2026
Top Stories Supreme Court
Political NEWS Legislative Corner Celebstreet International Videos
Subscribe Contact Us
close
Crime, Police And Law

CBI Judge Denies Bail to Former Maharashtra Home Minister Anil Deshmukh's Lawyer Anand Daga and Sub-Inspector Abhishek Tiwari

By Nargis Bano      13 September, 2021 02:29 PM      0 Comments
CBI Judge Denies Bail to Former Maharashtra Home Minister Anil Deshmukh

On Wednesday, (September,8, 2021), Special CBI Judge Vimal Kumar Yadav denied bail to former Maharashtra Home Minister Anil Deshmukh's lawyer, Anand Daga, and Sub-Inspector Abhishek Tiwari in the case of alleged document leakage.

The Court also ordered both to be produced on September 20,2021, when their judicial custody expires.

The FIR was filed against Daga, Tiwari, and unknown others, alleging that they conspired to reveal case sensitive and confidential documents to Anand Daga in exchange for undue advantage and illegal gratification.

The arrests came after the CBI filed a FIR against the sub-inspector, a Nagpur-based advocate, and unidentified individuals on various charges, including illegal gratification.

On August 29,2021, a report allegedly based on a preliminary investigation conducted by the CBI was leaked to the media. According to the report, the agency concluded that "no cognizable offence has been committed by Anil Deshmukh."

In its preliminary investigation, the CBI discovered that Deshmukh's legal team attempted to bribe some lower-ranking CBI officials, according to its internal investigation. Strict punishment will be meted out to the employees involved in the case.

Anand Daga and Sub-Inspector Abhishek Tiwari were previously remanded in judicial custody for 14 days after the Court denied the CBI's request to extend their custody for 5 days.

Anand Daga and Sub-Inspector Abhishek Tiwari were apprehended by the CBI in Mumbai and Delhi, respectively.

The aforementioned FIR was filed in accordance with Sections 120B of the Indian Penal Code, 1860 and Sections 7 and 8 of the Prevention of Corruption Act, 1988.



Share this article:



Leave a feedback about this
TRENDING NEWS

gauhati-hc-quashes-case-against-influencer-who-claimed-assamese-women-practise-black-magic-and-convert-men-into-animals
Trending Judiciary
Gauhati HC Quashes Case Against Influencer Who Claimed Assamese Women Practise Black Magic and Convert Men Into Animals [Read Order]

Gauhati High Court quashes case against influencer Abhishek Kar over remarks on black magic in Assam, holds offences under BNS, IT Act not made out.

11 February, 2026 03:08 PM
high-courts-cannot-nullify-arbitration-proceedings-while-substituting-arbitrators-sc
Trending Judiciary
High Courts Cannot Nullify Arbitration Proceedings While Substituting Arbitrators: SC [Read Order]

Supreme Court rules High Courts cannot nullify arbitration proceedings while appointing substitute arbitrators under Section 15(2) of the Arbitration Act.

11 February, 2026 03:58 PM

TOP STORIES

resignation-on-medical-grounds-attracts-forfeiture-of-pension-service-madras-hc-full-bench
Trending Judiciary
Resignation on Medical Grounds Attracts Forfeiture of Pension Service: Madras HC Full Bench [Read Order]

Madras High Court Full Bench rules resignation on medical grounds leads to forfeiture of past service under Tamil Nadu Pension Rules, 1978.

09 February, 2026 12:16 PM
madras-hc-clarifies-section-37-of-ndps-act-not-applicable-to-acceptance-of-bond-for-appearance
Trending Judiciary
Madras HC Clarifies: Section 37 of NDPS Act Not Applicable to Acceptance of Bond for Appearance [Read Order]

Madras High Court says Section 37 NDPS Act doesn’t apply to acceptance of bond for appearance on summons, as it is distinct from grant of bail.

09 February, 2026 12:20 PM
sc-refers-matter-to-larger-bench-to-resolve-conflicting-judgments-on-third-partys-right-under-under-order-ix-rule-13-cpc
Trending Judiciary
SC Refers Matter To Larger Bench To Resolve Conflicting Judgments On Third Party’s Right Under Under Order IX Rule 13 CPC [Read Order]

Supreme Court refers the issue of third party rights under Order IX Rule 13 CPC to a larger bench to resolve conflicting judgments on ex parte decrees.

09 February, 2026 12:35 PM
bombay-sessions-court-grants-bail-in-193-crore-cyber-fraud-case-reaffirms-bail-is-rule-jail-is-exception
Trending Judiciary
Bombay Sessions Court Grants Bail in ₹1.93 Crore Cyber Fraud Case, Reaffirms ‘Bail Is Rule, Jail Is Exception’ [Read Order]

Bombay Sessions Court grants bail in ₹1.93 crore cyber fraud case, citing right to liberty as investigation is complete and accused not direct beneficiary.

09 February, 2026 04:17 PM

ADVERTISEMENT


Join Group

Signup for Our Newsletter

Get Exclusive access to members only content by email