38.6c New Delhi, India, Friday, May 15, 2026
Top Stories Supreme Court
Political NEWS Legislative Corner Celebstreet International Videos
Subscribe Contact Us
close
Crime, Police And Law

CCTVs in Police Station not working when man forced to sing national anthem was held- Delhi Police to Delhi High Court

By Abhishek Gaind      26 March, 2021 03:24 PM      0 Comments
CCTVs in Police Station not working

Pair ghis jayenge lekin daurna nahi chhodungi. Faizan ko abhi insaaf nahi mila hai, uske gunehgaar abhi khula ghum rahe hai

Kismatunmother of the 23 year old Faizan who died as a result of custodial violence 

Last year, when communal riots broke out in North-Eastern Delhi, the loss in life and property was immeasurable. It was estimated that around 53 people died at that time and more than 200 were injured because the violence that took place during the riots. Nearly two-third of the people died were Muslims along with a police officer, an intelligence officer and over a dozen Hindus.

In February,2020 a video got viral of a group of policemen assaulting 5 men who were detained by the police. The video showed these 5 men lying on the floor in excruciating pain forced to sing the National Anthem and chant VANDE MATARAM. Among this group of 5 men assaulted by the police was Faizan, a 23-year old youngster who sustained substantial injuries in that horrific episode. On 25th February he was admitted to the LNJP Hospital where he gave in to his injuries 3 days later and died.

Faizans mother in an interview claimed that her son was among the 5 men who were assaulted by the Policemen in that video and claimed that his son died due to the injuries that he sustained at the hands of the policemen.

The 61 years old Faizens mother, Kismatun filed the petition in the High Court of Delhi through advocates Vrinda Grover and Soutik Banerjee, seeking a Special Investigation Team (SIT) probe into her sons death. In her plea she stated that the police had detained her son illegally, beat hm mercilessly as evident from the viral video and didnt provide him healthcare in time due to which he ultimately succumbed to his injuries and took his last breath shortly after being released on the hospital bed.

The court asked the police to provide the information from the CCTV cameras which were operative at the time of the incident by the way of affidavit to which the police replied that the CCTV cameras in the police station were not working on the day of the incident due to some technical fault.

During investigation, it came on record that on the date and time of incident that is, on 24.02.2020 CCTV cameras of police station Jyoti Nagar were not working due to some technical fault, the police said, in its reply, further adding, This fault had been lodged in the daily diary register.

The police also provided a service report from a private engineer corroborating the statement that the cameras were not working on the day of the incident and that he did not notice any signs of tampering with the CCTV cameras or its footage when he examined the cameras trying to resolve the issue.

The police have not been able to completely identify the personnel who were involved in this act till now as they were wearing helmets and didnt have their name tags on them. They added that they were only able to pinpoint one policeman on probable basis from the video.

It is quite unfortunate that in India cases of custodial violence and deaths are increasing at an alarming rate. Throughout the world, custodial violence is considered to be on of the most cruel and inhuman violation of basic human rights. It is condemned globally yet we come across so many cases of custodial violence even today.



Share this article:



Leave a feedback about this
TRENDING NEWS

no-offence-under-sc-st-act-if-alleged-casteist-abuse-occurred-inside-private-house-sc
Trending Judiciary
No Offence Under SC/ST Act If Alleged Casteist Abuse Occurred Inside Private House: SC [Read Judgment]

Supreme Court rules SC/ST Act offence is not made out if alleged casteist abuse occurred inside a private house without public view.

14 May, 2026 03:16 PM
madras-hc-bars-tiruppattur-mla-from-floor-test-over-disputed-one-vote-victory
Trending Judiciary
Madras HC Bars Tiruppattur MLA From Floor Test Over Disputed One-Vote Victory [Read Order]

Madras High Court restrains Tiruppattur MLA from floor test participation over disputed one-vote victory and alleged electoral irregularities.

14 May, 2026 03:24 PM

TOP STORIES

delhi-hc-refers-to-larger-bench-issue-on-stage-of-hearing-accused-under-section-223-bnss-before-cognizance
Trending Judiciary
Delhi HC Refers to Larger Bench Issue on Stage of Hearing Accused Under Section 223 BNSS Before Cognizance [Read Judgment]

Delhi High Court refers to Larger Bench issue on when accused must be heard under Section 223 BNSS before taking cognizance.

09 May, 2026 10:25 AM
hymen-intact-does-not-mean-no-penetration-delhi-high-court-upholds-pocso-conviction-of-tenant-who-raped-six-year-old-girl
Trending Judiciary
‘Hymen Intact Does Not Mean No Penetration’: Delhi High Court Upholds POCSO Conviction of Tenant Who Raped Six-Year-Old Girl [Read Order]

Delhi High Court upheld a tenant’s POCSO conviction for raping a six-year-old girl, holding that an intact hymen does not negate penetration.

09 May, 2026 12:42 PM
consumer-commission-directs-bus-operator-to-pay-50000-compensation-after-barat-reaches-wedding-destination-at-3-am-due-to-breakdown
Trending Judiciary
Consumer Commission Directs Bus Operator to Pay ₹50,000 Compensation After Barat Reaches Wedding Destination at 3 AM Due to Breakdown [Read Order]

Delhi Consumer Commission ordered a bus operator to pay ₹50,000 compensation after a Barat reached the wedding venue at 3 AM due to breakdown.

09 May, 2026 01:56 PM
sabarimala-reference-day-13-can-faith-justify-civil-death-and-genital-cutting-of-children-sc-bench-examines-religions-reach-over-the-body
Trending Judiciary
Sabarimala Reference Day 13: “Can Faith Justify Civil Death and Genital Cutting of Children?”: SC Bench Examines Religion’s Reach Over the Body

SC’s nine-judge bench examined whether religious practices violating dignity, bodily autonomy and conscience can claim protection under Article 26.

09 May, 2026 02:25 PM

ADVERTISEMENT


Join Group

Signup for Our Newsletter

Get Exclusive access to members only content by email