38.6c New Delhi, India, Sunday, February 15, 2026
Top Stories Supreme Court
Political NEWS Legislative Corner Celebstreet International Videos
Subscribe Contact Us
close
Crime, Police And Law

Chandigarh Court Imposes Fine Of Rs 50,000 On Man for Committing Theft of his own Car

By LawStreet News Network      27 September, 2019 04:44 AM      0 Comments
Chandigarh Court Imposes Fine Of Rs 50,000 On Man for Committing Theft of his own Car

A Chandigarh Court has recently imposed a fine of Rs 50,000 on a 26-year-old youth for stealing his own car clamped by the traffic police for wrong parking, TOI reported.

The complaint filed against Varinder Singh, a resident of Fatehgarh Sahib, alleged that he committed theft of the car from the possession of traffic police by removing the wheel clamp.

As per the complaint, a Maruti Swift Dzire car bearing Delhi registration number was wrongly parked and police clamped two of its tyres and pasted a slip on the glass on March 26, 2019. After a while, when the police reached the spot, they found the clamp broken and the car missing.

The police arrested Varinder the same day and charge-sheeted him under Sections 379 and 411 of the Indian Penal Code, 1860, and Section 3 of Prevention of Damage to Public Property Act, 1984.

During trial, Varinder pleaded guilty and admitted to the prosecutions case. Pleading for leniency, he said he had come to Chandigarh from Punjab and was employed in Dubai. He said he could not join his employment due to which his family may suffer, seeking a lenient view be adopted while pronouncing the order. He also said he was a first-time offender and unaware about the practice of clamping of wheel by traffic police.

After hearing both the parties, the court observed: ...adventure of the convict in removing the tyre on which clamp was put up by the traffic police and to drive away the vehicle after changing the tyre merits dissuasive and exemplary punishment.

The court thus sentenced him to undergo imprisonment for the period already undergone by him in custody (March 26 April 1) and fined him.



Share this article:

User Avatar
About:


Leave a feedback about this
TRENDING NEWS


TOP STORIES

resignation-on-medical-grounds-attracts-forfeiture-of-pension-service-madras-hc-full-bench
Trending Judiciary
Resignation on Medical Grounds Attracts Forfeiture of Pension Service: Madras HC Full Bench [Read Order]

Madras High Court Full Bench rules resignation on medical grounds leads to forfeiture of past service under Tamil Nadu Pension Rules, 1978.

09 February, 2026 12:16 PM
madras-hc-clarifies-section-37-of-ndps-act-not-applicable-to-acceptance-of-bond-for-appearance
Trending Judiciary
Madras HC Clarifies: Section 37 of NDPS Act Not Applicable to Acceptance of Bond for Appearance [Read Order]

Madras High Court says Section 37 NDPS Act doesn’t apply to acceptance of bond for appearance on summons, as it is distinct from grant of bail.

09 February, 2026 12:20 PM
sc-refers-matter-to-larger-bench-to-resolve-conflicting-judgments-on-third-partys-right-under-under-order-ix-rule-13-cpc
Trending Judiciary
SC Refers Matter To Larger Bench To Resolve Conflicting Judgments On Third Party’s Right Under Under Order IX Rule 13 CPC [Read Order]

Supreme Court refers the issue of third party rights under Order IX Rule 13 CPC to a larger bench to resolve conflicting judgments on ex parte decrees.

09 February, 2026 12:35 PM
bombay-sessions-court-grants-bail-in-193-crore-cyber-fraud-case-reaffirms-bail-is-rule-jail-is-exception
Trending Judiciary
Bombay Sessions Court Grants Bail in ₹1.93 Crore Cyber Fraud Case, Reaffirms ‘Bail Is Rule, Jail Is Exception’ [Read Order]

Bombay Sessions Court grants bail in ₹1.93 crore cyber fraud case, citing right to liberty as investigation is complete and accused not direct beneficiary.

09 February, 2026 04:17 PM

ADVERTISEMENT


Join Group

Signup for Our Newsletter

Get Exclusive access to members only content by email