38.6c New Delhi, India, Monday, March 16, 2026
Top Stories Supreme Court
Political NEWS Legislative Corner Celebstreet International Videos
Subscribe Contact Us
close
Crime, Police And Law

Chandigarh Court Imposes Fine Of Rs 50,000 On Man for Committing Theft of his own Car

By LawStreet News Network      27 September, 2019 04:44 AM      0 Comments
Chandigarh Court Imposes Fine Of Rs 50,000 On Man for Committing Theft of his own Car

A Chandigarh Court has recently imposed a fine of Rs 50,000 on a 26-year-old youth for stealing his own car clamped by the traffic police for wrong parking, TOI reported.

The complaint filed against Varinder Singh, a resident of Fatehgarh Sahib, alleged that he committed theft of the car from the possession of traffic police by removing the wheel clamp.

As per the complaint, a Maruti Swift Dzire car bearing Delhi registration number was wrongly parked and police clamped two of its tyres and pasted a slip on the glass on March 26, 2019. After a while, when the police reached the spot, they found the clamp broken and the car missing.

The police arrested Varinder the same day and charge-sheeted him under Sections 379 and 411 of the Indian Penal Code, 1860, and Section 3 of Prevention of Damage to Public Property Act, 1984.

During trial, Varinder pleaded guilty and admitted to the prosecutions case. Pleading for leniency, he said he had come to Chandigarh from Punjab and was employed in Dubai. He said he could not join his employment due to which his family may suffer, seeking a lenient view be adopted while pronouncing the order. He also said he was a first-time offender and unaware about the practice of clamping of wheel by traffic police.

After hearing both the parties, the court observed: ...adventure of the convict in removing the tyre on which clamp was put up by the traffic police and to drive away the vehicle after changing the tyre merits dissuasive and exemplary punishment.

The court thus sentenced him to undergo imprisonment for the period already undergone by him in custody (March 26 April 1) and fined him.



Share this article:

User Avatar
About:


Leave a feedback about this
TRENDING NEWS


TOP STORIES

tarun-holi-murder-case-delhi-police-पर-क्यों-नाराज़-हैं-पड़ोसी-law-street-journal
Trending Videos
Tarun Holi Murder Case: Delhi Police पर क्यों नाराज़ हैं पड़ोसी? || Law Street Journal

In this ground report on the Tarun Holi Murder Case, the team of Law Street Journal reaches Uttam Nagar, Delhi, where a shocking incident during Holi celebrations allegedly led to the death of a young man, Tarun. The dispute reportedly began after a Holi balloon thrown by a child accidentally hit a woman, which later escalated into a violent confrontation.

10 March, 2026 07:33 PM
itat-mumbai-deletes-1159-crore-addition-under-section-69a-brokers-papers-and-retracted-statement-held-insufficient
Trending Judiciary
ITAT Mumbai Deletes ₹11.59 Crore Addition Under Section 69A; Broker’s Papers and Retracted Statement Held Insufficient [Read Order]

Mumbai ITAT deletes ₹11.59 crore addition under Section 69A, holding broker’s papers and a retracted statement insufficient to prove alleged on-money receipts.

11 March, 2026 04:41 PM
prosecution-is-not-persecution-re-examining-the-constitutional-role-of-the-state-in-indias-criminal-justice-system-under-the-crpc-and-the-bnss
Trending Vantage Points
Prosecution is Not Persecution: Re-Examining the Constitutional Role of the State in India’s Criminal Justice System under the CrPC and the BNSS

Advocate Udit Arora examines how prosecution under CrPC and BNSS remains a constitutional duty—balancing justice, fairness, victim rights and protection of the innocent.

11 March, 2026 05:16 PM
sc-dismisses-mcgms-challenge-to-arbitral-award-holds-conduct-of-party-relevant-to-decide-jurisdictional-challenge
Trending Judiciary
SC Dismisses MCGM’s Challenge to Arbitral Award, Holds Conduct of Party Relevant to Decide Jurisdictional Challenge [Read Judgment]

Supreme Court dismisses MCGM’s challenge to arbitral award, holds party conduct relevant while deciding jurisdictional objections under Section 16 of the Arbitration Act.

13 March, 2026 12:31 PM

ADVERTISEMENT


Join Group

Signup for Our Newsletter

Get Exclusive access to members only content by email