38.6c New Delhi, India, Monday, January 12, 2026
Top Stories Supreme Court
Political NEWS Legislative Corner Celebstreet International Videos
Subscribe Contact Us
close
Crime, Police And Law

Chandigarh Court Imposes Fine Of Rs 50,000 On Man for Committing Theft of his own Car

By LawStreet News Network      27 September, 2019 04:44 AM      0 Comments
Chandigarh Court Imposes Fine Of Rs 50,000 On Man for Committing Theft of his own Car

A Chandigarh Court has recently imposed a fine of Rs 50,000 on a 26-year-old youth for stealing his own car clamped by the traffic police for wrong parking, TOI reported.

The complaint filed against Varinder Singh, a resident of Fatehgarh Sahib, alleged that he committed theft of the car from the possession of traffic police by removing the wheel clamp.

As per the complaint, a Maruti Swift Dzire car bearing Delhi registration number was wrongly parked and police clamped two of its tyres and pasted a slip on the glass on March 26, 2019. After a while, when the police reached the spot, they found the clamp broken and the car missing.

The police arrested Varinder the same day and charge-sheeted him under Sections 379 and 411 of the Indian Penal Code, 1860, and Section 3 of Prevention of Damage to Public Property Act, 1984.

During trial, Varinder pleaded guilty and admitted to the prosecutions case. Pleading for leniency, he said he had come to Chandigarh from Punjab and was employed in Dubai. He said he could not join his employment due to which his family may suffer, seeking a lenient view be adopted while pronouncing the order. He also said he was a first-time offender and unaware about the practice of clamping of wheel by traffic police.

After hearing both the parties, the court observed: ...adventure of the convict in removing the tyre on which clamp was put up by the traffic police and to drive away the vehicle after changing the tyre merits dissuasive and exemplary punishment.

The court thus sentenced him to undergo imprisonment for the period already undergone by him in custody (March 26 April 1) and fined him.



Share this article:

User Avatar
About:


Leave a feedback about this
TRENDING NEWS


TOP STORIES

wrong-bail-orders-alone-without-evidence-of-corruption-cannot-justify-removal-of-judicial-officer-sc
Trending Judiciary
Wrong Bail Orders Alone, Without Evidence of Corruption, Cannot Justify Removal of Judicial Officer: SC [Read Judgment]

Supreme Court rules that wrong bail orders alone cannot justify removal of a judicial officer without proof of corruption, misconduct, or extraneous considerations.

06 January, 2026 07:43 PM
divorced-muslim-woman-can-seek-maintenance-under-crpc-even-after-receiving-amount-under-muslim-women-protection-act-kerala-hc
Trending Judiciary
Divorced Muslim Woman Can Seek Maintenance Under CrPC Even After Receiving Amount Under Muslim Women Protection Act: Kerala HC [Read Order]

Kerala High Court holds that a divorced Muslim woman can claim maintenance under Section 125 CrPC even after receiving amounts under the 1986 Act.

06 January, 2026 08:19 PM
delhi-hc-full-bench-settles-bsf-seniority-dispute-rule-of-continuous-regular-appointment-prevails
Trending Judiciary
Delhi HC Full Bench Settles BSF Seniority Dispute; Rule of ‘Continuous Regular Appointment’ Prevails [Read Judgment]

Delhi High Court Full Bench rules BSF seniority is based on date of continuous regular appointment, rejecting claims for antedated seniority due to delayed joining.

06 January, 2026 08:45 PM
borrowers-cannot-invoke-writ-jurisdiction-to-compel-banks-to-extend-one-time-settlement-benefits-kerala-hc
Trending Judiciary
Borrowers Cannot Invoke Writ Jurisdiction to Compel Banks to Extend One-Time Settlement Benefits: Kerala HC [Read Judgment]

Kerala High Court holds borrowers cannot invoke writ jurisdiction to compel banks to grant One-Time Settlement benefits, as OTS is not a legal right.

07 January, 2026 09:22 PM

ADVERTISEMENT


Join Group

Signup for Our Newsletter

Get Exclusive access to members only content by email