38.6c New Delhi, India, Saturday, May 02, 2026
Top Stories Supreme Court
Political NEWS Legislative Corner Celebstreet International Videos
Subscribe Contact Us
close
Crime, Police And Law

Complainant in Sexual Abuse Case Against Former Union Minister Chinmayanand Turns Hostile, Says She Never Accused Him

By Pavitra Shetty      14 October, 2020 09:52 PM      0 Comments
Complainant in Sexual Abuse Case Against Former Union Minister Chinmayanand Turns Hostile, Says She Never Accused Him

Thehigh-profile case filed against Former Union Minister Swami Chinmayanand accusing him of sexual abuse by a Shahjahapur Law student saw a turnabout in Court on Tuesday (October 13, 2020) where the complainant turned hostile and denied of making any such allegations against him.

On October 13, 2020, in the MP-MLA Court in Lucknow, the LLM student absolutely denied making sexual exploitation allegations against the Former Union Minister Swami Chinmayanand.

This case transpired after the female student posted a video on August 23, 2019, on social media stating that a senior leader of the sant community was harassing and threatening to kill her and she went missing on August 23, 2019. 

This female student was pursuing an LLM degree in Shahjahanpur Law College which was run by the trust of Former Union Minister Swami Chinmayanand.

The student then lodged an FIR with Lodhi Colony police station of New Delhi on September 5, 2019, and her father lodged another FIR in Shahjahapur. Both FIRs were merged.

The Former Union Minister Swami Chinmayanand faced the following charges in the FIR - 

1. Section 376 C of the Indian Penal Code 1921 - 

Whoever, in the place of custody established by or under any law for the time being in force or of a womans or childrens institution takes advantage of his official position and induces or seduces any female inmate of such institution to have sexual intercourse with him, such sexual intercourse not amounting to the offense of rape, shall be punished with imprisonment of either description for a term which may extend to five years and shall also be liable to fine

2. Section 342 in The Indian Penal Code1921- Wrongful Confinement 

3. Section 354D of Indian Penal Code 1921- Stalking.

4. Section 506 of Indian Penal Code 1921 - Criminal Intimidation 

Former Union Minister Swami Chinmayanand later filed a case of extortion against the girl and her three friends, namely Sanjay, Sachin, and Vikram for Rupees 5 crore and alleged that they had threatened to make video clips public which showed him getting messages from the student.

A Special Investigation Team was constituted by the Uttar Pradesh Government on the orders of the Supreme Court in September to investigate the case. 

On November 6, 2019, the SIT had filed a charge sheet in both the rape and extortion case and the statement of the female was recorded under Section 164 Code of Criminal Procedure (CrPC).

On December 6, 2019, the Allahabad High Court granted bail to the law student, who along with three others, was charged for trying to extort an amount of Rs 5 crore from former union minister Swami Chinmayanand.

On November 7, 2019, the law student challenged the Allahabad High Court order which held that Swami Chinmayanand was entitled to get a certified copy of the statement of the victim recorded under Section 164 Code of Criminal Procedure (CrPC).

The Supreme Court had on October 8, 2020, set aside an order of the Allahabad High Court which allowed Swami Chinmayanand to access a certified copy of the victim's statement.

A bench of the apex court, headed by Justice UU Lalit, had held that Swami Chinmayanand can't get access to the complainant's statement to the magistrate under Section 164 of the Code of Criminal Procedure (CrPC) during the investigation.

The Allahabad High Court in February 3. 2020 granted bail to Swami Chinmayanand who was arrested in September last year and transferred the trail from Shahjahanpur to Lucknows MP-MLA Court.

During this trial On October 13, 2020, in the MP-MLA Court in Lucknow, the student changed her statement and denied that she had levied any allegations against the Former Union Minister Swami Chinmayanand.

The prosecution of this case immediately moved an application under Section 340 of the Code of Criminal Procedure (CrPC) seeking action against her for perjury i.e. lying under oath.

Judge PK Rai directed to register the application and asked the prosecution to furnish a copy of the application to the victim and the accused.

The court fixed the date for hearing of this application on October 15, 2020.



Share this article:



Leave a feedback about this
TRENDING NEWS


TOP STORIES

sc-takes-suo-motu-cognisance-of-brutal-stabbing-of-woman-advocate-missing-children-hospital-refusal-under-scanner
Trending Judiciary
SC Takes Suo Motu Cognisance of Brutal Stabbing of Woman Advocate; Missing Children, Hospital Refusal Under Scanner

Supreme Court takes suo motu cognisance of Delhi lawyer stabbing case, orders probe into hospital denial and directs police to trace two missing children.

27 April, 2026 04:56 PM
west-bengal-elections-calcutta-hc-expands-motorcycle-restrictions-bars-group-riding
Trending Judiciary
West Bengal Elections Calcutta HC Expands Motorcycle Restrictions, Bars Group Riding [Read Order]

Calcutta High Court bars group motorcycle riding from two days before West Bengal polling, modifying Single Judge order on CEO’s appeal.

28 April, 2026 05:10 PM
mere-absence-of-results-in-hair-treatment-cannot-prove-medical-negligence-or-deficiency-in-service-ncdrc-sets-aside-orders-against-dermatologist-plastic-surgeon-and-lifecell-international
Trending Judiciary
Mere Absence of Results in Hair Treatment Cannot Prove Medical Negligence or Deficiency in Service: NCDRC Sets Aside Orders Against Dermatologist, Plastic Surgeon, and Lifecell International [Read Order]

NCDRC rules that failure of PRP hair treatment alone does not prove negligence, sets aside compensation orders against doctors and Lifecell International.

28 April, 2026 05:51 PM
sc-upholds-translocation-of-deer-from-hauz-khas-deer-park-to-rajasthan-tiger-reserves-directs-moefcc-to-grant-statutory-status-to-cec-wildlife-translocation-guidelines
Trending Judiciary
SC Upholds Translocation of Deer from Hauz Khas Deer Park to Rajasthan Tiger Reserves; Directs MoEFCC to Grant Statutory Status to CEC Wildlife Translocation Guidelines [Read Judgment]

Supreme Court upholds deer translocation from Hauz Khas to Rajasthan reserves; directs MoEFCC to grant statutory status to CEC guidelines.

28 April, 2026 05:57 PM

ADVERTISEMENT


Join Group

Signup for Our Newsletter

Get Exclusive access to members only content by email