38.6c New Delhi, India, Wednesday, April 24, 2024
Crime, Police And Law

Complainant in Sexual Abuse Case Against Former Union Minister Chinmayanand Turns Hostile, Says She Never Accused Him

By Pavitra Shetty      14 October, 2020 09:52 PM      0 Comments
Complainant in Sexual Abuse Case Against Former Union Minister Chinmayanand Turns Hostile, Says She Never Accused Him

Thehigh-profile case filed against Former Union Minister Swami Chinmayanand accusing him of sexual abuse by a Shahjahapur Law student saw a turnabout in Court on Tuesday (October 13, 2020) where the complainant turned hostile and denied of making any such allegations against him.

On October 13, 2020, in the MP-MLA Court in Lucknow, the LLM student absolutely denied making sexual exploitation allegations against the Former Union Minister Swami Chinmayanand.

This case transpired after the female student posted a video on August 23, 2019, on social media stating that a “senior leader of the sant community” was harassing and threatening to kill her and she went missing on August 23, 2019. 

This female student was pursuing an LLM degree in Shahjahanpur Law College which was run by the trust of Former Union Minister Swami Chinmayanand.

The student then lodged an FIR with Lodhi Colony police station of New Delhi on September 5, 2019, and her father lodged another FIR in Shahjahapur. Both FIRs were merged.

The Former Union Minister Swami Chinmayanand faced the following charges in the FIR - 

1. Section 376 C of the Indian Penal Code 1921 - 

“Whoever, in the place of custody established by or under any law for the time being in force or of a woman’s or children’s insti­tution takes advantage of his official position and induces or seduces any female inmate of such institution to have sexual intercourse with him, such sexual intercourse not amounting to the offense of rape, shall be pun­ished with imprisonment of either description for a term which may extend to five years and shall also be liable to fine ’’

2. Section 342 in The Indian Penal Code1921- Wrongful Confinement 

3. Section 354D of Indian Penal Code 1921- Stalking.

4. Section 506 of Indian Penal Code 1921 - Criminal Intimidation 

Former Union Minister Swami Chinmayanand later filed a case of extortion against the girl and her three friends, namely Sanjay, Sachin, and Vikram for Rupees 5 crore and alleged that they had threatened to make video clips public which showed him getting messages from the student.

A Special Investigation Team was constituted by the Uttar Pradesh Government on the orders of the Supreme Court in September to investigate the case. 

On November 6, 2019, the SIT had filed a charge sheet in both the rape and extortion case and the statement of the female was recorded under Section 164 Code of Criminal Procedure (CrPC).

On December 6, 2019, the Allahabad High Court granted bail to the law student, who along with three others, was charged for trying to extort an amount of Rs 5 crore from former union minister Swami Chinmayanand.

On November 7, 2019, the law student challenged the Allahabad High Court order which held that Swami Chinmayanand was entitled to get a certified copy of the statement of the victim recorded under Section 164 Code of Criminal Procedure (CrPC).

The Supreme Court had on October 8, 2020, set aside an order of the Allahabad High Court which allowed Swami Chinmayanand to access a certified copy of the victim's statement.

A bench of the apex court, headed by Justice UU Lalit, had held that Swami Chinmayanand can't get access to the complainant's statement to the magistrate under Section 164 of the Code of Criminal Procedure (CrPC) during the investigation.

The Allahabad High Court in February 3. 2020 granted bail to Swami Chinmayanand who was arrested in September last year and transferred the trail from Shahjahanpur to Lucknow’s MP-MLA Court.

During this trial On October 13, 2020, in the MP-MLA Court in Lucknow, the student changed her statement and denied that she had levied any allegations against the Former Union Minister Swami Chinmayanand.

The prosecution of this case immediately moved an application under Section 340 of the Code of Criminal Procedure (CrPC) seeking action against her for perjury i.e. lying under oath.

Judge PK Rai directed to register the application and asked the prosecution to furnish a copy of the application to the victim and the accused.

The court fixed the date for hearing of this application on October 15, 2020.

Share this article:

Leave a feedback about this

Trending Judiciary
Denying child care leave to working mothers of disabled children violated constitutional mandate: SC

Supreme Court of India rules denying child care leave for mothers of disabled kids violates constitutional rights.

23 April, 2024 11:15 AM
Trending Environment
Ignorance is not bliss: Okhla Waste to Energy Plant needs to be relocated, residents argue

Questions on the suitability of waste-to-energy plants in Delhi are not new, but the 2,000 tonnes per day Waste to Energy (WTE) plant, situated in the middle of the dense residential areas around Sukhdev Vihar, is not just a major environmental worry but an example of how siting rules can be bent to accommodate a heavily polluting enterprise.

23 April, 2024 12:29 PM


Trending Judiciary
PIL filed by Ashwini Kumar Upadhyay in SC for 3-yr Bachelor of Law degree after Class XII

PIL by Ashwini Kumar in SC seeks to shorten law degree to 3 years post-Class XII, citing current 5-year span as irrational.

18 April, 2024 11:21 AM
Trending Executive
Centre sets up high-powered committee to suggest measures to end discrimination against queer community [Read Order]

Centre forms committee to end discrimination against the queer community, chaired by the Cabinet Secretary, following a Supreme Court directive.

18 April, 2024 12:11 PM
Trending Judiciary
After Karnataka HC, Delhi HC sets aside Government circular banning 23 'ferocious' dog breeds [Read Judgement]

After Karnataka High Court, the Delhi High Court has set aside a Government circular banning 23 'ferocious' dog breeds.

18 April, 2024 01:06 PM
Trending Judiciary
For wrong decision of suicide by person of 'frail mentality', who is to be blamed? Delhi HC gives view [Read Judgment]

If a man of 'frail mentality' takes the wrong decision to commit suicide, who is to be blamed? Delhi High Court gives a prima facie opinion in the matter.

18 April, 2024 03:23 PM


Join Group

Signup for Our Newsletter

Get Exclusive access to members only content by email