38.6c New Delhi, India, Sunday, March 29, 2026
Top Stories Supreme Court
Political NEWS Legislative Corner Celebstreet International Videos
Subscribe Contact Us
close
Crime, Police And Law

Complainant in Sexual Abuse Case Against Former Union Minister Chinmayanand Turns Hostile, Says She Never Accused Him

By Pavitra Shetty      14 October, 2020 09:52 PM      0 Comments
Complainant in Sexual Abuse Case Against Former Union Minister Chinmayanand Turns Hostile, Says She Never Accused Him

Thehigh-profile case filed against Former Union Minister Swami Chinmayanand accusing him of sexual abuse by a Shahjahapur Law student saw a turnabout in Court on Tuesday (October 13, 2020) where the complainant turned hostile and denied of making any such allegations against him.

On October 13, 2020, in the MP-MLA Court in Lucknow, the LLM student absolutely denied making sexual exploitation allegations against the Former Union Minister Swami Chinmayanand.

This case transpired after the female student posted a video on August 23, 2019, on social media stating that a senior leader of the sant community was harassing and threatening to kill her and she went missing on August 23, 2019. 

This female student was pursuing an LLM degree in Shahjahanpur Law College which was run by the trust of Former Union Minister Swami Chinmayanand.

The student then lodged an FIR with Lodhi Colony police station of New Delhi on September 5, 2019, and her father lodged another FIR in Shahjahapur. Both FIRs were merged.

The Former Union Minister Swami Chinmayanand faced the following charges in the FIR - 

1. Section 376 C of the Indian Penal Code 1921 - 

Whoever, in the place of custody established by or under any law for the time being in force or of a womans or childrens institution takes advantage of his official position and induces or seduces any female inmate of such institution to have sexual intercourse with him, such sexual intercourse not amounting to the offense of rape, shall be punished with imprisonment of either description for a term which may extend to five years and shall also be liable to fine

2. Section 342 in The Indian Penal Code1921- Wrongful Confinement 

3. Section 354D of Indian Penal Code 1921- Stalking.

4. Section 506 of Indian Penal Code 1921 - Criminal Intimidation 

Former Union Minister Swami Chinmayanand later filed a case of extortion against the girl and her three friends, namely Sanjay, Sachin, and Vikram for Rupees 5 crore and alleged that they had threatened to make video clips public which showed him getting messages from the student.

A Special Investigation Team was constituted by the Uttar Pradesh Government on the orders of the Supreme Court in September to investigate the case. 

On November 6, 2019, the SIT had filed a charge sheet in both the rape and extortion case and the statement of the female was recorded under Section 164 Code of Criminal Procedure (CrPC).

On December 6, 2019, the Allahabad High Court granted bail to the law student, who along with three others, was charged for trying to extort an amount of Rs 5 crore from former union minister Swami Chinmayanand.

On November 7, 2019, the law student challenged the Allahabad High Court order which held that Swami Chinmayanand was entitled to get a certified copy of the statement of the victim recorded under Section 164 Code of Criminal Procedure (CrPC).

The Supreme Court had on October 8, 2020, set aside an order of the Allahabad High Court which allowed Swami Chinmayanand to access a certified copy of the victim's statement.

A bench of the apex court, headed by Justice UU Lalit, had held that Swami Chinmayanand can't get access to the complainant's statement to the magistrate under Section 164 of the Code of Criminal Procedure (CrPC) during the investigation.

The Allahabad High Court in February 3. 2020 granted bail to Swami Chinmayanand who was arrested in September last year and transferred the trail from Shahjahanpur to Lucknows MP-MLA Court.

During this trial On October 13, 2020, in the MP-MLA Court in Lucknow, the student changed her statement and denied that she had levied any allegations against the Former Union Minister Swami Chinmayanand.

The prosecution of this case immediately moved an application under Section 340 of the Code of Criminal Procedure (CrPC) seeking action against her for perjury i.e. lying under oath.

Judge PK Rai directed to register the application and asked the prosecution to furnish a copy of the application to the victim and the accused.

The court fixed the date for hearing of this application on October 15, 2020.



Share this article:



Leave a feedback about this
TRENDING NEWS

court-uses-doll-to-record-testimony-of-deaf-mute-rape-victim-conviction-upheld
Trending Judiciary
Court Uses Doll to Record Testimony of Deaf-Mute Rape Victim, Conviction Upheld [Read Judgment]

Chhattisgarh HC upheld a rape conviction, recognising doll-assisted gestural testimony of a deaf-mute victim as valid and reliable evidence.

28 March, 2026 02:30 PM

TOP STORIES

conversion-to-religion-other-than-hinduism-buddhism-or-sikhism-strips-sc-status-sc
Trending Judiciary
Conversion To Religion Other Than Hinduism, Buddhism Or Sikhism Strips SC Status: SC

Supreme Court rules conversion from Hinduism, Sikhism or Buddhism leads to loss of SC status; SC/ST Act protection denied to Christian convert.

24 March, 2026 05:20 PM
privacy-vs-prohibition-sc-to-examine-legality-of-breathalyser-based-enforcement-in-bihar
Trending Judiciary
Privacy vs Prohibition: SC to Examine Legality of Breathalyser-Based Enforcement in Bihar

Supreme Court to examine legality of breathalyser tests under Bihar Prohibition law, raising key issues on privacy, evidence, and Article 21 rights.

25 March, 2026 06:14 PM
sc-reverses-high-court-acquittal-in-child-rape-case-directs-all-high-courts-to-strictly-follow-ban-on-disclosure-of-victims-identity
Trending Judiciary
SC Reverses High Court Acquittal In Child Rape Case; Directs All High Courts To Strictly Follow Ban On Disclosure Of Victim’s Identity [Read Judgment]

SC restores conviction in child rape case, reverses acquittal, and directs strict compliance with law prohibiting disclosure of victim identity.

26 March, 2026 02:05 PM
allahabad-hc-grants-anticipatory-bail-to-swami-avimukteshwaranand-saraswati-in-pocso-case-rules-section-29-presumption-not-applicable-at-pre-arrest-stage
Trending Judiciary
Allahabad HC Grants Anticipatory Bail to Swami Avimukteshwaranand Saraswati in POCSO Case, Rules Section 29 Presumption Not Applicable at Pre-Arrest Stage [Read Order]

Allahabad High Court grants anticipatory bail to Swami Avimukteshwaranand Saraswati, rules Section 29 POCSO presumption not applicable at pre-arrest stage.

26 March, 2026 02:25 PM

ADVERTISEMENT


Join Group

Signup for Our Newsletter

Get Exclusive access to members only content by email