38.6c New Delhi, India, Tuesday, December 09, 2025
Top Stories Supreme Court
Political NEWS Legislative Corner Celebstreet International Videos
Subscribe Contact Us
close
Crime, Police And Law

Press note against Devangana Kalita - a Pinjra Tod member was in response to the allegations of Communalization against the the Delhi Police: Delhi Police to Delhi HC

By Shreedhara Purohit      18 July, 2020 12:20 PM      0 Comments
Devangana Kalita Pinja Tod member

The Delhi Police on July 16 opposed in the Delhi High Court against the allegations that information against Pinjra Tod activist Devangana Kalita, who is facing a probe for her alleged role in the northeast Delhi violence, was selectively leaked.

It was submitted before a bench of Justice Vibhu Bakhru that a press note released by the Deputy Commissioner of Police was based on a charge sheet in which allegations were leveled against Devangana Kalita. It was a proportional response to the allegations made by Pinjra Tod members on their Twitter accounts.

Representing Delhi Police, Additional Solicitor General Aman Lekhi, told the court that press note being cited by Kalita's counsel was issued to correct the perception that police being a statutory body is not part of any machinery and not to attack the Kalita. The press note was intended to restore the public faith in the police. 

Kalita's counsel cited some contents on social media wherein it was alleged that police have been used as a tool of the Hindu machinery. The High Court remarked that presumption of innocence should not be destroyed.

The Delhi Police also submitted that the press note was not selectively leaked as it was issued to 480 recipients in a Whatsapp group, which is managed by the police.

The court was hearing Kalita's plea against the cops for allegedly making selective leaks leading to the media trial. In her plea, Kalita said that the leaks to the media can cause severe undesirable effects during the pendency of the case. She has sought to restrain and prevent the Delhi police from further selective leaks related to the case.

Earlier, the Delhi Police had submitted in a status report that it was Kalita who had started a media campaign to gain public sympathy in an attempt to malign the ongoing investigation by peddling a false narrative of political vendetta.

The Delhi High Court had earlier restrained the police from issuing any statements or circulating information regarding evidence allegedly collected against Devangana Kalita, to any person including media.

Additional Solicitor General Aman Lekhi mentioned that the press note was a response to the allegations made by the Pinja Tod members on their twitter accounts. He said that the Pinjra Tod members have accused the Delhi police of massive Hindutva conspiracy which undermined the public faith in police resulting in the threatened social order.

Additional Solicitor General Aman Lekhi said, the nature of the case against Kalita was revealed by the members of the Pinja Tod themselves by giving all the details about the offenses invoked against her.   

The court observed that social media is an unruly horse.there are absurd comments made which have no connection to reality. You(police) couldve kept your ammunition dry till the charge sheet is filed. It becomes pivotal for the court to ensure that the matters which are yet to be heard do not become prejudicial.

The court restated that the accused's statement claiming innocence or challenging her arrest cannot be a ground to release information to the media.

The court said, this is how protest work. Agencies are given an opportunity to defend their actions in the court.

The court adjourned the matter for further hearing till July 17.



Share this article:



Leave a feedback about this
TRENDING NEWS

sc-questions-precedent-on-contractual-bars-to-arbitration-claims-refers-bharat-drilling-to-larger-bench
Trending Judiciary
SC Questions Precedent on Contractual Bars to Arbitration Claims, Refers ‘Bharat Drilling’ to Larger Bench [Read Judgment]

Supreme Court refers the 2009 Bharat Drilling ruling to a larger bench, questioning its use in interpreting contractual bars on arbitration claims.

08 December, 2025 04:45 PM
j-and-k-high-court-upholds-dismissal-of-injunction-plea-in-agrarian-reforms-dispute
Trending Judiciary
J&K High Court Upholds Dismissal of Injunction Plea in Agrarian Reforms Dispute [Read Order]

J&K High Court upholds dismissal of injunction plea, ruling that agrarian disputes fall under Agrarian Reforms Act authorities, not civil courts.

08 December, 2025 05:21 PM

TOP STORIES

hostile-india-china-ties-no-extradition-treaty-allahabad-hc-denies-bail-to-chinese-national-in-visa-forgery-case
Trending Judiciary
Hostile India–China Ties, No Extradition Treaty: Allahabad HC Denies Bail to Chinese National in Visa Forgery Case [Read Order]

Allahabad High Court denies bail to a Chinese national accused of visa tampering and forging Indian IDs, citing hostile India–China ties and no extradition treaty.

03 December, 2025 12:53 AM
attachment-before-judgment-cannot-cover-property-sold-prior-to-suit-filing-sc
Trending Judiciary
Attachment Before Judgment Cannot Cover Property Sold Prior to Suit Filing: SC [Read Judgment]

Supreme Court holds that property transferred before a suit cannot be attached under Order 38 Rule 5; fraud allegations must be pursued separately under Section 53 TP Act.

03 December, 2025 01:30 AM
sc-holds-no-review-or-appeal-maintainable-against-order-appointing-arbitrator
Trending Judiciary
SC Holds No Review Or Appeal Maintainable Against Order Appointing Arbitrator [Read Judgment]

Supreme Court rules that no review, recall or appeal lies against a Section 11 arbitrator appointment order, reaffirming minimal judicial interference in arbitration.

03 December, 2025 01:40 AM
partner-cannot-invoke-arbitration-clause-without-express-authorisation-of-other-partners-kerala-hc
Trending Judiciary
Partner Cannot Invoke Arbitration Clause Without Express Authorisation of Other Partners: Kerala HC [Read Order]

Kerala High Court rules that a partner cannot invoke an arbitration clause or seek appointment of an arbitrator without express authorisation from co-partners.

03 December, 2025 05:19 PM

ADVERTISEMENT


Join Group

Signup for Our Newsletter

Get Exclusive access to members only content by email