38.6c New Delhi, India, Sunday, February 22, 2026
Top Stories Supreme Court
Political NEWS Legislative Corner Celebstreet International Videos
Subscribe Contact Us
close
Crime, Police And Law

Ex-Karnataka CM Yediyurappa appears before CID for POCSO case probe, with protection of 'no arrest'

By Shreya Agarwal      17 June, 2024 04:46 PM      0 Comments
Ex Karnataka CM Yediyurappa appears before CID for POCSO case probe with protection of no arrest

BENGALURU: Former Karnataka Chief Minister B S Yediyurappa appeared before the Criminal Investigation Department (CID) of Karnataka Police on Monday morning for investigations in a Protection of Children from Sexual Offences (Pocso) Act case registered against him in March this year.

The case was registered on behalf of a minor who along with her cancer-ailing mother had allegedly approached the ex-CM in February for help with another sexual assault case.

Yediyurappa has consistently denied the allegations of sexual assault, stating that the case is politically motivated. He has moved the High Court for quashing of the case and for anticipatory bail.

He has also said that he was only trying to help the mother-daughter duo.

Karnataka BJP President and Yediyurappa's son B Y Vijayendra said that his father will face the investigations and has faith in the process of law.

Although he was originally summoned at 10.30 am on June 12, he sought time till June 17 citing political engagements in New Delhi.

The prosecution argued before the High Court that Yediyurappa had flown out the same day, despite receiving the notice to appear before the police.

Although the CID obtained an arrest warrant against Yediyurappa on grounds such as tampering of evidence and non-cooperation with investigation, but the arrest was restrained by the Karnataka High Court on Yediyurappa's petition.

However, the High Court directed Yediyurappa to appear for the investigations.

Having heard the learned counsel for the parties for some time and having perused the Petition papers, I am of the considered opinion that at this stage, no case is made out for halting the ongoing investigation in Crime No.84/2024 and that the petitioner should participate in the same by appearing before the jurisdictional Police on 17.06.2024 as was assured by him, said Justice Krishna S Dixit on June 14.

That being said, the petitioner, who is a former chief minister of the state multiple times and who is now an octogenarian, shall not be arrested when he appears before police and cooperates in the investigation process, Justice Dixit said.

The case will be heard next on June 28.

The mother of the minor, since deceased due to lung cancer, accused the former CM of sexual assault under Section 8 of the POCSO Act and Section 354 A of the Indian Penal Code (IPC) for sexual harassment.

The case was registered on March 14 and transferred to CID on March 15.

Arguing against any relief to Yediyurappa against the arrest warrant, the CID through Karnataka Advocate General argued that it was only issued after submissions were made regarding Yediyurappa and three other accused attempting to tamper with evidence, and lure witnesses.

Yediyurappa on the other hand argued that there was over a months delay in its filing.

CID said that it has gathered evidence on the occurrence of the incident, taken statements of the victim under Section 164 of the Criminal Procedure Code (CrPC) and data from a mobile device with recordings about the incident.

Previously, Yediyurappa's voice samples were collected for comparison with voices on a video recorded by complainant mother on the day of the alleged incident. 



Share this article:

About:

A wanderer, aspiring yogini and writer. Shreya is a lawyer by profession, journalist by passion. A g...Read more

Follow:
FacebookTwitterLinkedinInstagram


Leave a feedback about this
Related Posts
View All

Supreme Court: No Lesser Sentence Under POCSO Act for Aggravated Sexual Assault on Children [Read Judgment] Supreme Court: No Lesser Sentence Under POCSO Act for Aggravated Sexual Assault on Children [Read Judgment]

The Supreme Court of India has ruled that courts cannot impose a lesser sentence under the Protection of Children from Sexual Offences (POCSO) Act. The decision came in response to a case where the Allahabad High Court reduced the sentence of a man convicted of aggravated penetrative sexual assault on a child. The Supreme Court emphasized the lifelong impact on the victim and upheld the importance of stringent punishment for such crimes.

Supreme Court Directs States to Strengthen Support for Child Victims Under POCSO Act Implementation [Read Judgment] Supreme Court Directs States to Strengthen Support for Child Victims Under POCSO Act Implementation [Read Judgment]

The Supreme Court directs state governments to implement POCSO Rules 2020 effectively, emphasizing the importance of support for child victims during investigation, trial, and rehabilitation. The role of a 'support person' is highlighted, urging the need for guidelines and rules to provide comprehensive assistance. Get insights on the court's directions and the significance of support for victims.

No Rape If Muslim Man Makes Physical Relations With 15 Year Old Wife: Delhi High Court No Rape If Muslim Man Makes Physical Relations With 15 Year Old Wife: Delhi High Court

Controversial Delhi High Court Ruling: Acquittal of Muslim Man in Case of 15-Year-Old Wife. Explore the legal perspective on marriage age, consent, and POCSO Act implications.

Law Commission Recommends Judicial Discretion for Age of Consent Under POCSO Act [Read Law Commission Report] Law Commission Recommends Judicial Discretion for Age of Consent Under POCSO Act [Read Law Commission Report]

Learn about the Law Commission's stance on the age of consent under the POCSO Act, its recommendations for judicial discretion in sentencing, and the potential impact on child protection and exploitation. Explore the complexities surrounding consent and child sexual abuse laws.

TRENDING NEWS

us-sc-strikes-down-trumps-global-tariffs-rules-ieepa-does-not-authorize-president-to-impose-duties
Trending International
US SC Strikes Down Trump’s Global Tariffs, Rules IEEPA Does Not Authorize President to Impose Duties [Read Order]

US Supreme Court strikes down Trump’s global tariffs, ruling that IEEPA does not authorize the President to impose import duties.

21 February, 2026 02:45 PM
kerala-hc-issues-notice-to-cbfc-over-certification-of-the-kerala-story-2-goes-beyond
Trending Judiciary
Kerala HC Issues Notice to CBFC Over Certification of ‘The Kerala Story 2 – Goes Beyond’

Kerala High Court issues notice to CBFC over certification of The Kerala Story 2, questions safeguards under Cinematograph Act; release not stayed.

21 February, 2026 02:50 PM

TOP STORIES

sc-declines-to-entertain-plea-over-alleged-anti-muslim-remarks-by-assam-cm-says-approach-hc
Trending Judiciary
SC Declines to Entertain Plea Over Alleged Anti-Muslim Remarks by Assam CM, Says Approach HC

Supreme Court asks petitioners to approach Gauhati High Court over alleged hate speech by Assam CM, declines plea for FIRs and SIT probe.

16 February, 2026 02:52 PM
can-live-in-partner-be-prosecuted-under-section-498a-ipc-sc-to-decide-scope-of-husband-in-cruelty-law
Trending Judiciary
Can Live-In Partner Be Prosecuted Under Section 498A IPC? SC To Decide Scope Of ‘Husband’ In Cruelty Law [Read Order]

Supreme Court to decide if a man in a live-in relationship can be prosecuted under Section 498A IPC for cruelty. Case to impact scope of “husband”.

16 February, 2026 03:33 PM
sc-sets-aside-anticipatory-bail-granted-to-absconding-murder-accused-in-madhya-pradesh-political-rivalry-case
Trending Judiciary
SC Sets Aside Anticipatory Bail Granted To Absconding Murder Accused In Madhya Pradesh Political Rivalry Case [Read Judgment]

Supreme Court sets aside anticipatory bail to absconding murder accused in MP political rivalry case, calls HC order perverse and unjustified.

16 February, 2026 03:59 PM
places-of-worship-act-does-not-protect-illegal-encroachments-on-government-land-madras-hc
Trending Judiciary
Places of Worship Act Does Not Protect Illegal Encroachments on Government Land: Madras HC [Read Order]

Madras High Court rules that Places of Worship Act, 1991 does not protect temples built on encroached government land; eviction upheld in Ramanathapuram case.

16 February, 2026 04:18 PM

ADVERTISEMENT


Join Group

Signup for Our Newsletter

Get Exclusive access to members only content by email