38.6c New Delhi, India, Friday, February 13, 2026
Top Stories Supreme Court
Political NEWS Legislative Corner Celebstreet International Videos
Subscribe Contact Us
close
Crime, Police And Law

After ABVP Complaint, F.I.R. Registered Against Assam Universitys Assistant Professor Over Joke On Lord Ram On Facebook

By RITIK JAIN      12 August, 2020 01:58 PM      0 Comments
FIR Registered Against Assam University Assistant Professor

On August 5,2020, Anindya Sen, Assistant Professor of Assam University for the last 9 years, Silchur, posted a joke on Facebook on Lord Ram, on the very day on the auspicious occasion of Bhoomi Poojan of Ram Mandir in Ayodhya, Uttar Pradesh. After the act done by the Assistant Professor, F.I.R. was lodged against him on August 8, based on the complaint filed by the ABVP functionary. 

The complaint was lodged by Rohit Chanda, the ABVP functionary, and leader, against Anindya Sen, for hurting religious sentiments and degrading the dignity of Hindu God Ram. Rohit last year filed a complaint against Souravdeep Sengupta, who tried to abuse Sanatan Dharma on Facebook.

He requested Silchur Police Station to take strict actions against Anindya Sen for spreading communal hate and degrading the dignity of Sanatan Dharma. ABVP and Police authorities told Anindya Sen to take down such posts which are causing hate in society, but still, the post is not taken down by him till now. Everywhere, in the comments section and on Facebook, there has been a huge outrage against Anindya for posting such disrespecting things on Facebook about God. Every person who has seen the post was abusing him in the comments section and messages section. 

Once, he was warned by a person that Cyber Cell Department will arrest you 

In his defense, he said that he had not done anything which is against parliamentary words, and no abusive language was used in the joke. He said that the joke was about how Ram abandoned his wife thinking, about what other people will think of him as a King. He also said that there are many books in different languages, where many critics have criticized Ram on the same. He said that there were many death threats and other threats given to him on the same, so regarding this, his family is worried about his life.

When he was asked about this incident, he said nobody has invoked me to do such thing, but my own instinct. It was completely my decision to post this joke and I usually post such jokes. It is completely on the basis of what I think. 

He has been charged under Section 294, 295A and 501of Indian Penal Code, 1860. Further, it is noticed that he continuously posts such posts or comments, which defames Hindu Religion, and also shares some posts which abuse constitutional posts like Prime Minister and Home Minister of India. 

Section 294 of IPC: Obscene acts or songs: Whoever does any act which annoys others, like does any obscene act in any public place, or sings, recites or utters any obscene song, ballad or words, in or near any public place, shall be punished with imprisonment of either description for a term which may extend to three months, or with fine, or with both.

Section 295A of IPC: Whoever deliberately does some malicious act which causes hurt to someones religious feelings or hurts religious sentiments of someone or a class of people, by words, either spoken or written or by signs or by visible representation, insults any religion shall be punished with either imprisonment of 3 years or fine or both.

Section 501 of IPC: Whoever, by the printing or by speech, knowing of having a good reason that it is defamatory for any person of being, shall be punished with imprisonment of 2 years or fine or both. 

 



Share this article:



Leave a feedback about this
TRENDING NEWS

sc-notifies-2026-guidelines-for-senior-advocate-designation-scraps-point-system-and-interviews
Trending Judiciary
SC Notifies 2026 Guidelines for Senior Advocate Designation; Scraps Point System and Interviews [Read Notification]

Supreme Court notifies 2026 guidelines for Senior Advocate designation, abolishing point system and interviews; introduces holistic evaluation process.

12 February, 2026 04:00 PM
sunjay-kapur-will-dispute-priya-sachdev-files-application-to-dismiss-mil-rani-kapurs-family-trust-fraud-allegations
Trending Judiciary
Sunjay Kapur Will Dispute: Priya Sachdev Files Application To Dismiss MIL Rani Kapur’s Family Trust Fraud Allegations

Delhi HC issues notice on Priya Kapur’s plea to dismiss Rani Kapur’s suit alleging a fraudulent family trust to divert late Sunjay Kapur’s estate.

12 February, 2026 04:32 PM

TOP STORIES

resignation-on-medical-grounds-attracts-forfeiture-of-pension-service-madras-hc-full-bench
Trending Judiciary
Resignation on Medical Grounds Attracts Forfeiture of Pension Service: Madras HC Full Bench [Read Order]

Madras High Court Full Bench rules resignation on medical grounds leads to forfeiture of past service under Tamil Nadu Pension Rules, 1978.

09 February, 2026 12:16 PM
madras-hc-clarifies-section-37-of-ndps-act-not-applicable-to-acceptance-of-bond-for-appearance
Trending Judiciary
Madras HC Clarifies: Section 37 of NDPS Act Not Applicable to Acceptance of Bond for Appearance [Read Order]

Madras High Court says Section 37 NDPS Act doesn’t apply to acceptance of bond for appearance on summons, as it is distinct from grant of bail.

09 February, 2026 12:20 PM
sc-refers-matter-to-larger-bench-to-resolve-conflicting-judgments-on-third-partys-right-under-under-order-ix-rule-13-cpc
Trending Judiciary
SC Refers Matter To Larger Bench To Resolve Conflicting Judgments On Third Party’s Right Under Under Order IX Rule 13 CPC [Read Order]

Supreme Court refers the issue of third party rights under Order IX Rule 13 CPC to a larger bench to resolve conflicting judgments on ex parte decrees.

09 February, 2026 12:35 PM
bombay-sessions-court-grants-bail-in-193-crore-cyber-fraud-case-reaffirms-bail-is-rule-jail-is-exception
Trending Judiciary
Bombay Sessions Court Grants Bail in ₹1.93 Crore Cyber Fraud Case, Reaffirms ‘Bail Is Rule, Jail Is Exception’ [Read Order]

Bombay Sessions Court grants bail in ₹1.93 crore cyber fraud case, citing right to liberty as investigation is complete and accused not direct beneficiary.

09 February, 2026 04:17 PM

ADVERTISEMENT


Join Group

Signup for Our Newsletter

Get Exclusive access to members only content by email