38.6c New Delhi, India, Saturday, May 25, 2024
Crime, Police And Law

"Painful to Note That Standard of Investigation is Very Poor in Large Number of Riots Cases" : Delhi Court Pulls Up Police, Calls for Remedial Action [READ ORDER]

By Nargis Bano      31 August, 2021 02:38 PM      0 Comments
Painful to Note That Standard of Investigation is Very Poor in Large Number of Riots Cases

A Delhi Court has chastised the Delhi Police for the way it investigated cases relating to the North East Delhi riots, including the filing of half-baked charge sheets and the non-appearance of Investigating Officers before the Court.

Additional Meetings Judge Vinod Yadav also demanded immediate action and requested that the DCP of the North East District and other senior officials take note of the situation.

The Court made the following observation:

"It is also painful to note that in a large number of riot cases, the standard of investigation is very poor: after filing a charge sheet in court, neither the IO, the SHO, nor the aforementioned supervising officers bother to see what other material is required to be collected from the scene, appropriate authority in the matter, and what steps must be taken to bring the investigation to a logical conclusion."

"It has been observed that after filing the half-baked charge sheets in Court, the police make little effort to bring the investigation to a logical conclusion. As a result, the accused persons who have been implicated in multiple cases remain imprisoned".

The remark came as the Court was preparing charges against Ashraf Ali and Parvez, who were accused of being active members of the riotous mob that allegedly attacked and injured police officers on duty by throwing acid on them.

"It is past time for the DCP of the North-East District and other higher-ranking officers to take note of the aforementioned observations and take the necessary corrective action. They are free to seek the advice of experts in this regard; otherwise, there is a risk of injustice being done to the people involved in these cases," the Court stated.

Based on the facts of the case, the Court summoned the Police after observing that the IO failed to collect a sample of acid/corrosive substance and have it chemically analysed. It was also observed that the IO did not bother to gather information about the nature of the victims' injuries.

"The supervising officers have miserably failed to supervise the investigation, as contemplated by Delhi High Court Rules, particularly Rule Nos.10,13, and 14 of Part A, Chapter 11, Volume-III, as well as Rule 3 Volume III Chapter 12," the Court noted at the outset.

"It is extremely painful to note here that a large number of riot cases have been pending consideration on charge before this Court, and in the majority of cases, the IOs have not been appearing in Court, either physically or via video-conferencing, at the time of consideration on charge," it added.

The Court also observed that the IOs simply e-mail a pdf of the charge sheet to Special Public Prosecutors in riot cases and leave it up to them to argue the case on charge, without giving them an opportunity to delve deeply into the facts and the investigation conducted in the case.

The FIR was filed on February 27, last year, after a constable filed a written complaint alleging that a group of rioters attacked him and other staff members with glass bottles, acids, and bricks, causing injuries.

The Court framed charges against them after prima facie observing that there was sufficient evidence on record to charge the accused persons under sections 147, 148, 149, 188, 186, 326, 326A, 353, 332, and 34 of the Indian Penal Code (IPC), 1860.

"A copy of this order be sent to the Commissioner of Delhi Police for his reference and directing the taking of remedial measures, as specified in paragraph No.16 here in above," the Court ordered.



Share this article:

Leave a feedback about this

Trending Events & Opportunity
LIVE Coverage: In-Depth Exploration of Bhartiya Sakshya Adhiniyam (BSA) at DHCBA Lecture Series [Watch Live]

LIVE Coverage: DHCBA Lecture Series explores the Bhartiya Sakshya Adhiniyam (BSA), 2023 with Justice Bhambhani & Senior Advocate Jayant Mehta. Tune in at 5pm on LawStreet Journal!

24 May, 2024 11:30 AM
Trending Judiciary
BJP Moves Supreme Court Against Calcutta High Court's Ban on "Derogatory" Ads Targeting TMC

BJP moves Supreme Court against Calcutta High Court order banning "derogatory" ads targeting TMC during Lok Sabha elections, seeks urgent hearing.

24 May, 2024 12:12 PM


Trending Judiciary
Supreme Court refuses to entertain plea for stay on new criminal laws

SC refuses plea to stay new criminal laws. Court deems the plea casual, noting laws aren't yet implemented. Petitioner withdraws. Laws effective from July 1, 2024.

20 May, 2024 12:58 PM
Trending Know The Law
SCBA Election Result 2024, Know the newly elected members

SCBA Election Result 2024: Senior Advocate Kapil Sibal elected President. Know the newly elected members and key office bearers leading the Supreme Court Bar Association.

20 May, 2024 03:03 PM
Trending Judiciary
Cannot Allow the Game of Hide and Seek for Committing Murder of an Unborn Child: MP High Court [Read Order]

MP High Court denies abortion for minor rape victim, condemns misuse of legal authority to terminate pregnancy and prevent justice.

20 May, 2024 03:52 PM
Trending Judiciary
Pune Porsche Hit & Run: Bail Granted to 17 Year Old in Under 14 Hours, Asked to write essay

Bail granted to 17-year-old in Pune Porsche hit-and-run case within 14 hours. Conditions include educational tasks, supervision, and counseling. Incident killed two.

20 May, 2024 04:30 PM


Join Group

Signup for Our Newsletter

Get Exclusive access to members only content by email