38.6c New Delhi, India, Saturday, February 21, 2026
Top Stories Supreme Court
Political NEWS Legislative Corner Celebstreet International Videos
Subscribe Contact Us
close
Crime, Police And Law

Kerala journalist Siddiqui Kappan petitions Mathura District Court for regular bail

By Saakshi Singh Rawat      04 June, 2021 03:29 PM      0 Comments
journalist Siddiqui Kappan Mathura District Court

Siddique Kappan, a journalist from Kerala, has filed a regular bail plea with the Mathura District Court, claiming that the charge sheet has no evidence linking the petitioner to the accused crimes other than bare assertions with no backing papers.

The Bail Application, citing the Supreme Court's order granting him the right to seek any legal remedy available to him, along with the right to file an application for bail and other exemptions, claims that maintaining him in jail on the basis of UAPA is anything but a mishandling of its regulations, especially when there is no proof or recovering against the suspect even in the charge sheet. 

The bail plea further states that even if the applicant had been seen in the company of some PF members, it cannot be a basis for arrest and refusal of bail, especially when the petitioner is a reporter by profession, and as a reporter, he is obligated to go around and travel with all kinds of individuals from different walks of life in order to carry out his journalistic duties.

Background of Siddique Kappan

In the aftermath of the Hathras gangrape-murder case, Siddique Kappan and three others were taken into custody by UP Police on their way to Hathras on October3, and were consequently booked together under UAPA, asserting that he and his co-passengers were attempting to provoke communal riots and hinder social harmony. Last year, the Kerala Union of Working Journalists (KUWJ) petitioned the Supreme Court for Kappan's release, claiming that he had been wrongfully detained. Later in the case, Kappan's wife was also involved.

Kappan's wife recently wrote to the CJI, asserting that her husband (who was tested positive for COVID-19) is caged like an animal in a bed at the Medical College Hospital in Mathura, without freedom of movement, and that he has been unable to eat or use the toilet for more than four days, and is in critical condition. The letter further claimed that despite being mentioned more than seven times, the Writ of Habeas Corpus petition submitted on 6th October,2020, which was meant to be disposed of on March9,2021, had not been disposed of.

As a result, it requested that urgent action be taken/necessary orders are issued to return Kappan to the Mathura Jail as an interim remedy, until the outcome of the related application filed on 22nd April, 2021. It should be noted that the Kerala Union of Working Journalists (KUWJ) has approached the Supreme Court to have Kerala Journalist Siddique Kappan transferred to the All-India Institute of Medical Sciences (AIIMS) or Safdarjung Hospital in Delhi, citing a medical emergency.

According to the Kerala Union of Working Journalists (KUWJ), Kappan fainted in the restroom on 20th April,2021, suffering significant injuries. He later tested positive for COVID-19 and is currently hospitalised in Mathura hospital.

Kappan was associated to the Popular Front of India, according to the UP government, and was attempting to provoke communal disturbances under the guise of a journalist. Kappan has no ties to the Popular Front of India, according to the KUWJ (PFI). The KUWJ claims that the UP government is taking contradictory positions in two affidavits.

On 28th April, the Supreme Court ordered that journalist Siddique Kappan be transferred from Uttar Pradesh's Mathura Jail to any government hospital in Delhi for medical treatment.

According to the above order, he was transported in an ambulance from Mathura Jail to AIIMS, New Delhi, where he has been receiving treatment since 30th April. However, according to the Notice, none of Kappan's family members or lawyer were kept informed about his health condition until 7th May, 2021.



Share this article:



Leave a feedback about this
TRENDING NEWS

homoeopathy-practitioner-cannot-prescribe-allopathy-medicines-telangana-hc
Trending Judiciary
Homoeopathy Practitioner Cannot Prescribe Allopathy Medicines: Telangana HC [Read Order]

Supreme Court holds homoeopathy practitioners cannot prescribe allopathy drugs; Telangana HC quashes FIR on procedural lapse under NMCA.

20 February, 2026 11:28 AM
contractual-bar-on-interest-claims-overrides-interest-act-kerala-high-court-order-set-aside-sc
Trending Judiciary
Contractual Bar on Interest Claims Overrides Interest Act; Kerala High Court Order Set Aside: SC [Read Order]

Supreme Court rules that contractual clauses barring interest claims override the Interest Act, setting aside Kerala High Court’s order on delayed payments.

20 February, 2026 11:43 AM

TOP STORIES

sc-declines-to-entertain-plea-over-alleged-anti-muslim-remarks-by-assam-cm-says-approach-hc
Trending Judiciary
SC Declines to Entertain Plea Over Alleged Anti-Muslim Remarks by Assam CM, Says Approach HC

Supreme Court asks petitioners to approach Gauhati High Court over alleged hate speech by Assam CM, declines plea for FIRs and SIT probe.

16 February, 2026 02:52 PM
can-live-in-partner-be-prosecuted-under-section-498a-ipc-sc-to-decide-scope-of-husband-in-cruelty-law
Trending Judiciary
Can Live-In Partner Be Prosecuted Under Section 498A IPC? SC To Decide Scope Of ‘Husband’ In Cruelty Law [Read Order]

Supreme Court to decide if a man in a live-in relationship can be prosecuted under Section 498A IPC for cruelty. Case to impact scope of “husband”.

16 February, 2026 03:33 PM
sc-sets-aside-anticipatory-bail-granted-to-absconding-murder-accused-in-madhya-pradesh-political-rivalry-case
Trending Judiciary
SC Sets Aside Anticipatory Bail Granted To Absconding Murder Accused In Madhya Pradesh Political Rivalry Case [Read Judgment]

Supreme Court sets aside anticipatory bail to absconding murder accused in MP political rivalry case, calls HC order perverse and unjustified.

16 February, 2026 03:59 PM
places-of-worship-act-does-not-protect-illegal-encroachments-on-government-land-madras-hc
Trending Judiciary
Places of Worship Act Does Not Protect Illegal Encroachments on Government Land: Madras HC [Read Order]

Madras High Court rules that Places of Worship Act, 1991 does not protect temples built on encroached government land; eviction upheld in Ramanathapuram case.

16 February, 2026 04:18 PM

ADVERTISEMENT


Join Group

Signup for Our Newsletter

Get Exclusive access to members only content by email