38.6c New Delhi, India, Monday, March 16, 2026
Top Stories Supreme Court
Political NEWS Legislative Corner Celebstreet International Videos
Subscribe Contact Us
close
Crime, Police And Law

Kangaroo Court Imposes 3 Lakh Fine on Couple for Inter-Caste Marriage

By LawStreet News Network      29 June, 2018 12:00 AM      0 Comments
Tamil Nadu Court

Kangaroo court at Jogirpalayam village near Shoolagiri in Tamil Nadus Krishnagiri district has fined a couple 3 Lakh for having Inter-caste marriage.

When couple failed to pay the fine to the headman of the village, the grooms house was locked and fenced with barbwire and the family was forced to live in a hut outside. Family members of the house were threatened not to venture out of their home until they pay the fine.

On the complaint of the groom after three days, the police removed the barbwire and arrested the village headman and three others for various charges under the Indian Penal Code, 1860.

Chandru, 23 years old ran away with his girlfriend Deivanai from his village and got married in April 2017. Chandru belongs to Boyer community while his wife Deivanai is from Vanniyar, the dominant cast in the village.

Chandru said in his complaint to the Krishnagiri Superintendent of the police Both the family members were facing various troubles from the village headman Raghavan and his henchmen after we eloped. We stayed out of the village sensing more trouble.

After Chandrus wife gave birth to a baby on April 2018, they visited the village along with their six-day-old baby, but the village headman convened a kangaroo court to impose a fine of 3 lakh and banned the couple from entering the village.

Though Chandru tried to bargain and pay the fine for leading a peaceful life with his family, the headman refused to accept. In order to force him to pay the fine, the headman along with his supporters locked Chandrus house and forced his family members to live in a hut where they have suffered without food and water for the last three days.

After he filed a complaint with the SP on Tuesday (June 26th, 2018), the Shoolagiri police Inspector visited the village and rescued his family members. An FIR has been filed against Raghavan and three others under sections 448 (house trespass), 384 (extortion) and 506 (criminal intimidation) and they have been remanded in judicial custody.



Share this article:

User Avatar
About:


Leave a feedback about this
TRENDING NEWS


TOP STORIES

tarun-holi-murder-case-delhi-police-पर-क्यों-नाराज़-हैं-पड़ोसी-law-street-journal
Trending Videos
Tarun Holi Murder Case: Delhi Police पर क्यों नाराज़ हैं पड़ोसी? || Law Street Journal

In this ground report on the Tarun Holi Murder Case, the team of Law Street Journal reaches Uttam Nagar, Delhi, where a shocking incident during Holi celebrations allegedly led to the death of a young man, Tarun. The dispute reportedly began after a Holi balloon thrown by a child accidentally hit a woman, which later escalated into a violent confrontation.

10 March, 2026 07:33 PM
itat-mumbai-deletes-1159-crore-addition-under-section-69a-brokers-papers-and-retracted-statement-held-insufficient
Trending Judiciary
ITAT Mumbai Deletes ₹11.59 Crore Addition Under Section 69A; Broker’s Papers and Retracted Statement Held Insufficient [Read Order]

Mumbai ITAT deletes ₹11.59 crore addition under Section 69A, holding broker’s papers and a retracted statement insufficient to prove alleged on-money receipts.

11 March, 2026 04:41 PM
prosecution-is-not-persecution-re-examining-the-constitutional-role-of-the-state-in-indias-criminal-justice-system-under-the-crpc-and-the-bnss
Trending Vantage Points
Prosecution is Not Persecution: Re-Examining the Constitutional Role of the State in India’s Criminal Justice System under the CrPC and the BNSS

Advocate Udit Arora examines how prosecution under CrPC and BNSS remains a constitutional duty—balancing justice, fairness, victim rights and protection of the innocent.

11 March, 2026 05:16 PM
sc-dismisses-mcgms-challenge-to-arbitral-award-holds-conduct-of-party-relevant-to-decide-jurisdictional-challenge
Trending Judiciary
SC Dismisses MCGM’s Challenge to Arbitral Award, Holds Conduct of Party Relevant to Decide Jurisdictional Challenge [Read Judgment]

Supreme Court dismisses MCGM’s challenge to arbitral award, holds party conduct relevant while deciding jurisdictional objections under Section 16 of the Arbitration Act.

13 March, 2026 12:31 PM

ADVERTISEMENT


Join Group

Signup for Our Newsletter

Get Exclusive access to members only content by email