38.6c New Delhi, India, Thursday, June 30, 2022
Top Stories
Interviews Know The Law Book Reviews Videos
About Us Contact Us
Crime, Police And Law

Meghalaya High Court Suggests Army To Conduct Surprise Checks On Its Vehicles To Prevent Possible Drug Trafficking

By Vaibhav Gattani      Apr 02, 2022      0 Comments      734 Views

The Meghalaya High Court on 30th March 2022 suggested in the case M Kharkongor vs. State of Meghalaya that 'flying army checker' teams be deployed for surprise checks on Army vehicles, after it emerged that they may allegedly be used to traffic drugs.

Chief Justice Sanjib Banerjee and Justice W Diengdoh took note of the Amicus Curiae's submission that recently, an Army Major from Imphal was implicated for facilitating the transit of drugs.

Reacting to the Amicus mentioning that a correctional home inmate suggested that high-ranking defence personnel may have been roped in for the trade, the Bench stated,

"Unbelievable though such allegation is, it has to be noticed nonetheless that according to the relevant inmate drugs are sometimes transported in army trucks, which are generally immune from checking."

The High Court added that a copy of the present order should reach the General Officer Commanding of the 101 Area and the Director General of the Assam Rifles to take immediate remedial action if the information is verified.

"If what is reported is true, there must also be intelligence reports received by the State in such regard and the Chief Secretary should coordinate with, inter alia, the Army and Assam Rifles, both to make the highest officials aware of the problem and for immediate action being taken. It may also do well for teams of flying army checkers to be deployed along the route to make surprise checks on Army vehicles which are otherwise not subjected to checks by civilian personnel," the Court said.

Amicus Curiae SP Mahanta had, pursuant to an earlier order in the public interest litigation (PIL) matter, forwarded details of places where the drug menace was prevalent in the State.

He had submitted that since Meghalaya falls within the transit route of drugs emanating from a neighbouring country or going to such countries, a certain modus operandi was being followed.

The Court took note of the Amicus' 'meticulous' work in visiting correctional homes and Opioid Substitution Therapy Centres and discovering from some inmates that for the safe passage of the drugs, high-ranking defence personnel might have to be involved.

Listing the matter for further hearing on April 28, 2022, the Bench observed that another area needing to be looked into was for therapy and de-addiction centres in the State.

"Many families affected have to look beyond the State where wards are sent in the absence of adequate facilities being available in Meghalaya, despite the urgent need therefor. There may also be a need for de-addiction centres, particularly to house young female offenders," the Court observed.

Along with Amicus Curie Mahanta, Advocate M Lyngdoh appeared for the petitioner. The State was represented by Advocate General A. Kumar and Advocate S Laloo.

 

 



Tags:
Meghalaya High CourtChief Justice Sanjib BanerjeeJustice W DiengdohPublic Interest LitigationsAdvocate M LyngdohAdvocate General A KumarAdvocate S LalooArmy checker
Share this article:



Leave a feedback about this




Related Posts
View All

TRENDING NEWS

Trending Know The Law
Is Azaan A Hate Speech ?
26 days ago
Trending Know The Law
Is Azaan A Hate Speech ?
26 days ago

TOP STORIES


ADVERTISEMENT


Lawstreet Advertisement

Signup for Our Newsletter

Get Exclusive access to members only content by email