38.6c New Delhi, India, Thursday, November 06, 2025
Top Stories Supreme Court
Political NEWS Legislative Corner Celebstreet International Videos
Subscribe Contact Us
close
Crime, Police And Law

Mukul Mudgal, Former Chief Justice Of Punjab & Haryana HC Accused Of Sexual Assault

By LawStreet News Network      26 December, 2018 12:00 AM      0 Comments
Mukul Mudgal, Former Chief Justice Of Punjab & Haryana HC Accused Of Sexual Assault

Justice Mukul Mudgal, former Chief Justice of the Punjab & Haryana High Court, has been accused by a family friend of sexually assaulting her in the early 90s, ThePrint reports.

As per the report, on the day of the incident, Mudgal J had allegedly gone to the house of the woman at 11 pm at night on the pretence of wanting coffee.

The woman alleged that Justice Mudgal grabbed the cup from her, put it down on a surface nearby, and slammed her onto the bed in the room.

I was down on the bed, and he was on top of me with full force. And I mean full force, the woman alleged.

The report states that as the woman narrated what she said happened that night, her body recoiled, and she pulled a hand over her face. He slobbered all over meIt was disgusting.

With her arms flailing and legs kicking, he finally relented and left the house, she said.

He didnt go all the way. He didnt rape me. But he did attack me.

The woman alleged that the incident left her with bruises all over her body.

When reached for comment, Justice Mudgal denied the allegation, terming it as utterly false and baseless.

As per the report, Justice Mudgal said that The alleged incident is said to have taken place more than 25 years ago. While I did have a few meals with her around that period, our friendship did not continue as I felt that we did not have much in common.

However, the allegations that I went to her house or that I had assaulted her and caused bruises are utterly false and baseless.

I have lived a life without moral blemish. I have worked and moved with women of different ages and different spheres of life without giving a cause for complaint to anyone.

When the question was asked from the woman as to why she is speaking up now, the woman reportedly said that For years I couldnt say anything because of how close our families were. I felt too many people would be hurt if I spoke up against him.

At the time of the alleged assault, and the years after it, she considered the shame of the incident to be solely hers, she said. But that changed in 2016, when her daughter was allegedly sexually harassed.

Her daughters experience, compounded by her own, has shaken her faith in the judiciary and courts to an irreconcilable degree, the woman said.

Moreover, heartened by the Me Too movement, she finally confronted the former judge on October 18 this year, sending him a WhatsApp message. After she denied Mudgal J permission to call her, the former judges cousin allegedly called her and told her that the incident was a mistake on the part of the judge. However, Mudgal J has denied using the word mistake.

Summing up, the woman told ThePrint that I want to tell this story because my child has suffered the same fate even if in a different way, she said. If the keepers of the law are themselves the perpetrators, can any woman hope to have any justice?

Justice Mukul Mudgal got enrolled as a lawyer in 1973 and five years later become an Advocate-on-Record at the Supreme Court of India. He was appointed as a judge of the Delhi High Court in 1998. He was later appointed as Chief Justice of the Punjab & Haryana High Court in 2009, before retiring in 2011.

After retirement, he headed the Mudgal Committee to conduct independent inquiries into allegations of corruption in the Indian cricket board. He is also a member of the FIFA Governance Committee and Review Committee.



Share this article:

User Avatar
About:


Leave a feedback about this
TRENDING NEWS

instigation-for-suicide-need-not-be-compulsive-suggestive-words-enough-to-attract-section-306-ipc
Trending Judiciary
Instigation for Suicide Need Not Be Compulsive; Suggestive Words Enough to Attract Section 306 IPC [Read Order]

Kerala High Court rules that instigation for suicide under Section 306 IPC need not be forceful; even suggestive words implying the consequence can attract liability.

05 November, 2025 04:10 PM
public-ground-cannot-be-reserved-for-any-religion-madras-hc
Trending Judiciary
Public Ground Cannot Be Reserved For Any Religion: Madras HC [Read Order]

Madras HC rules public grounds cannot be reserved for any religion, allowing Annadhanam on village land and holding that law-and-order fears can’t curb fundamental rights.

05 November, 2025 05:10 PM

TOP STORIES

hit-and-run-accident-case-sc-transfers-trial-involving-judicial-officer-from-punjab-to-delhi
Trending Judiciary
Hit-and-run accident case: SC transfers trial involving judicial officer from Punjab to Delhi

SC shifts hit-and-run case involving probationer judicial officer from Punjab to Delhi over alleged bias; orders potential further probe by Delhi Police.

31 October, 2025 11:27 AM
sc-issues-stern-warning-to-state-bar-councils-over-excessive-enrolment-fees-threatens-contempt-action
Trending Judiciary
SC Issues Stern Warning To State Bar Councils Over Excessive Enrolment Fees, Threatens Contempt Action [Read Order]

SC warns State Bar Councils to stop charging over ₹750 enrollment fee or face contempt; directs BCI to issue circular, return applicants’ documents immediately.

31 October, 2025 11:32 AM
lawyers-cant-be-summoned-for-legal-advice-unless-covered-under-exceptions-of-sec-132-bsa-sc
Trending Judiciary
Lawyers can't be summoned for legal advice unless covered under exceptions of Sec 132 BSA: SC

Supreme Court rules lawyers cannot be summoned for legal advice unless exceptions under Sec 132 BSA apply, safeguarding lawyer-client privilege and legal profession autonomy.

31 October, 2025 02:29 PM
conviction-us-138-ni-act-cannot-be-ground-to-stop-pension-madras-high-court
Trending Judiciary
Conviction U/S 138 NI Act Cannot Be Ground To Stop Pension: Madras High Court [Read Order]

Madras HC rules conviction under Section 138 NI Act is not moral turpitude and cannot justify stopping pension of retired employee; directs release of dues.

01 November, 2025 04:08 PM

ADVERTISEMENT


Join Group

Signup for Our Newsletter

Get Exclusive access to members only content by email