38.6c New Delhi, India, Monday, January 12, 2026
Top Stories Supreme Court
Political NEWS Legislative Corner Celebstreet International Videos
Subscribe Contact Us
close
Crime, Police And Law

"India Will Not Stand Deaths Of Five To Take Vengeance For One," Says Nirbhaya Convicts Lawyer, AP Singh

By LawStreet News Network      04 February, 2020 11:02 AM      0 Comments

The lawyer representing the four Nirbhaya rape and murder convicts, AP Singh on Monday (February 3, 2020) said, "India will not tolerate the deaths of five to avenge the death of one." It is to be noted, his statement has come after the Delhi High Court reserved its order against the orders of Delhi Court sustaining that the execution against four convicts be stayed. He also said that in one corner there are mothers of four convicts and one mother of the victim on the other side which shouldnt be neglected. "The political trial is going alongside the trial of public sentiments due to upcoming the Delhi State Assembly elections," he added. It is an injustice to hang the convicts in a hurry and questioned the haste of the Delhi High Court in this case saying "Justice hurried is justice buried." The advocate of the four convicts felt that the convicts are undergoing the brunt because they are poor, rural and come from Dalit families. Till last year, the Central Government wasnt a party to this case, but when the execution got stayed in sine die, petitions were filed and cases were heard on weekends by the Court. The lawyer justifies giving importance to the Constitution of India despite which he claims people are writing against his family on social media. He brought the awareness to the Red-fort bomb blast accused Arif Alias Ashfaq whose curative petition, review petition, Special Leave Petition (SLP) and Mercy Petition have been rejected, despite that neither the Delhi Government nor the Tihar Jail has given any notice for his execution. 

Nirbhayas mother Asha Devi cited Singh of bragging to her in open court that execution of Nirbhaya convicts will never happen. The Delhi High Court on Sunday (February 2, 2020) reserved its judgment on the Centres plea for the execution of the four rape convicts. Justice Suresh Kait hearing the case said the bench will pass an order after all parties have finished their arguments. The Solicitor-General of India, Tushar Mehta representing the Centres plea told Justice Kait that Pawan Guptas act of not filing curative or mercy petitions timely is deliberate and calculated action which is undertaken to frustrate the mandates of law. 

The Additional District Court did conclude that the Court can pursue Rules 836, 850 and 854 of the Delhi Prison Rules, 2018 and opined that it has "no hesitation" in postponing the death warrant qua Vinay because of the pendency of his mercy plea before the President. As far as other convicts are concerned, the court added that second proviso to Rule 836 provides those cases where the appeal or application by one is pending; the execution to sentence shall be postponed in case of all. The court after hearing both sides came up to a conclusion that it is appropriate that execution should get postponed till further orders arent made.

Nirbhaya was gang-raped and savagely assaulted on the night of 16th December 2012 which happened inside a moving bus in South Delhi. The trial of five men started in a special fast-track court in March 2013, the prime-accused perpetrated suicide by garrotting himself in Tihar Jail during the days of the trial. A juvenile was sent to an undisclosed place due to threat to his life after he was released from correctional home in 2015.

 

Author: Asif Iqbal



Share this article:

User Avatar
About:


Leave a feedback about this
TRENDING NEWS


TOP STORIES

wrong-bail-orders-alone-without-evidence-of-corruption-cannot-justify-removal-of-judicial-officer-sc
Trending Judiciary
Wrong Bail Orders Alone, Without Evidence of Corruption, Cannot Justify Removal of Judicial Officer: SC [Read Judgment]

Supreme Court rules that wrong bail orders alone cannot justify removal of a judicial officer without proof of corruption, misconduct, or extraneous considerations.

06 January, 2026 07:43 PM
divorced-muslim-woman-can-seek-maintenance-under-crpc-even-after-receiving-amount-under-muslim-women-protection-act-kerala-hc
Trending Judiciary
Divorced Muslim Woman Can Seek Maintenance Under CrPC Even After Receiving Amount Under Muslim Women Protection Act: Kerala HC [Read Order]

Kerala High Court holds that a divorced Muslim woman can claim maintenance under Section 125 CrPC even after receiving amounts under the 1986 Act.

06 January, 2026 08:19 PM
delhi-hc-full-bench-settles-bsf-seniority-dispute-rule-of-continuous-regular-appointment-prevails
Trending Judiciary
Delhi HC Full Bench Settles BSF Seniority Dispute; Rule of ‘Continuous Regular Appointment’ Prevails [Read Judgment]

Delhi High Court Full Bench rules BSF seniority is based on date of continuous regular appointment, rejecting claims for antedated seniority due to delayed joining.

06 January, 2026 08:45 PM
borrowers-cannot-invoke-writ-jurisdiction-to-compel-banks-to-extend-one-time-settlement-benefits-kerala-hc
Trending Judiciary
Borrowers Cannot Invoke Writ Jurisdiction to Compel Banks to Extend One-Time Settlement Benefits: Kerala HC [Read Judgment]

Kerala High Court holds borrowers cannot invoke writ jurisdiction to compel banks to grant One-Time Settlement benefits, as OTS is not a legal right.

07 January, 2026 09:22 PM

ADVERTISEMENT


Join Group

Signup for Our Newsletter

Get Exclusive access to members only content by email