38.6c New Delhi, India, Thursday, March 26, 2026
Top Stories Supreme Court
Political NEWS Legislative Corner Celebstreet International Videos
Subscribe Contact Us
close
Crime, Police And Law

"India Will Not Stand Deaths Of Five To Take Vengeance For One," Says Nirbhaya Convicts Lawyer, AP Singh

By LawStreet News Network      04 February, 2020 11:02 AM      0 Comments

The lawyer representing the four Nirbhaya rape and murder convicts, AP Singh on Monday (February 3, 2020) said, "India will not tolerate the deaths of five to avenge the death of one." It is to be noted, his statement has come after the Delhi High Court reserved its order against the orders of Delhi Court sustaining that the execution against four convicts be stayed. He also said that in one corner there are mothers of four convicts and one mother of the victim on the other side which shouldnt be neglected. "The political trial is going alongside the trial of public sentiments due to upcoming the Delhi State Assembly elections," he added. It is an injustice to hang the convicts in a hurry and questioned the haste of the Delhi High Court in this case saying "Justice hurried is justice buried." The advocate of the four convicts felt that the convicts are undergoing the brunt because they are poor, rural and come from Dalit families. Till last year, the Central Government wasnt a party to this case, but when the execution got stayed in sine die, petitions were filed and cases were heard on weekends by the Court. The lawyer justifies giving importance to the Constitution of India despite which he claims people are writing against his family on social media. He brought the awareness to the Red-fort bomb blast accused Arif Alias Ashfaq whose curative petition, review petition, Special Leave Petition (SLP) and Mercy Petition have been rejected, despite that neither the Delhi Government nor the Tihar Jail has given any notice for his execution. 

Nirbhayas mother Asha Devi cited Singh of bragging to her in open court that execution of Nirbhaya convicts will never happen. The Delhi High Court on Sunday (February 2, 2020) reserved its judgment on the Centres plea for the execution of the four rape convicts. Justice Suresh Kait hearing the case said the bench will pass an order after all parties have finished their arguments. The Solicitor-General of India, Tushar Mehta representing the Centres plea told Justice Kait that Pawan Guptas act of not filing curative or mercy petitions timely is deliberate and calculated action which is undertaken to frustrate the mandates of law. 

The Additional District Court did conclude that the Court can pursue Rules 836, 850 and 854 of the Delhi Prison Rules, 2018 and opined that it has "no hesitation" in postponing the death warrant qua Vinay because of the pendency of his mercy plea before the President. As far as other convicts are concerned, the court added that second proviso to Rule 836 provides those cases where the appeal or application by one is pending; the execution to sentence shall be postponed in case of all. The court after hearing both sides came up to a conclusion that it is appropriate that execution should get postponed till further orders arent made.

Nirbhaya was gang-raped and savagely assaulted on the night of 16th December 2012 which happened inside a moving bus in South Delhi. The trial of five men started in a special fast-track court in March 2013, the prime-accused perpetrated suicide by garrotting himself in Tihar Jail during the days of the trial. A juvenile was sent to an undisclosed place due to threat to his life after he was released from correctional home in 2015.

 

Author: Asif Iqbal



Share this article:

User Avatar
About:


Leave a feedback about this
TRENDING NEWS

privacy-vs-prohibition-sc-to-examine-legality-of-breathalyser-based-enforcement-in-bihar
Trending Judiciary
Privacy vs Prohibition: SC to Examine Legality of Breathalyser-Based Enforcement in Bihar

Supreme Court to examine legality of breathalyser tests under Bihar Prohibition law, raising key issues on privacy, evidence, and Article 21 rights.

25 March, 2026 06:14 PM

TOP STORIES

failure-to-generate-profits-from-movie-does-not-indicate-dishonest-intent-civil-dispute-cannot-be-given-the-colour-of-a-criminal-offence-sc
Trending Judiciary
Failure To Generate Profits From Movie Does Not Indicate Dishonest Intent; Civil Dispute Cannot Be Given the Colour of a Criminal Offence: SC [Read Judgment]

Supreme Court quashes Section 420 IPC case against film producer, says failure to share movie profits shows civil dispute, not cheating.

20 March, 2026 01:37 PM
gujarat-hc-upholds-cat-order-directs-centre-to-appoint-physically-handicapped-candidate-as-postal-sorting-assistant
Trending Judiciary
Gujarat HC Upholds CAT Order, Directs Centre to Appoint Physically Handicapped Candidate as Postal Sorting Assistant [Read Judgment]

Gujarat HC upholds CAT order, directs Centre to appoint physically handicapped candidate as Postal Sorting Assistant, rejecting Union’s plea.

20 March, 2026 02:24 PM
orissa-hc-directs-son-to-vacate-ancestral-house-for-86-year-old-father-dismisses-cross-writ-petitions
Trending Judiciary
Orissa HC Directs Son to Vacate Ancestral House for 86-Year-Old Father; Dismisses Cross Writ Petitions [Read Judgment]

Orissa HC directs son to vacate ancestral house for 86-year-old father, dismissing both cross writ petitions under MWPSC Act, 2007.

20 March, 2026 02:28 PM
calling-journalists-shit-reporters-and-high-on-weed-goes-beyond-fair-criticism-delhi-hc-orders-news-laundry-to-remove-disparaging-remarks-against-aajtak
Trending Judiciary
Calling Journalists ‘Shit Reporters’ and ‘High on Weed’ Goes Beyond Fair Criticism: Delhi High Court Orders News Laundry to Remove Disparaging Remarks Against AajTak [Read Judgment]

Delhi High Court orders News Laundry to remove remarks against AajTak, holding terms like “shit reporters” went beyond fair criticism.

20 March, 2026 03:16 PM

ADVERTISEMENT


Join Group

Signup for Our Newsletter

Get Exclusive access to members only content by email