38.6c New Delhi, India, Friday, October 25, 2024
Breaking News
Top Stories Supreme Court
Political NEWS Legislative Corner Celebstreet International Videos
Subscribe Contact Us
close
Crime, Police And Law

District Magistrate Of Lucknow Orders FIR u/s 269 And 270 Of IPC Against Singer Kanika Kapoor: COVID 19 Outbreak

By LawStreet News Network      20 March, 2020 10:03 PM      0 Comments
Singer Kanika Kapoor COVID19 Outbreak

The  Lucknow District Magistrate Abhishek Prakash has ordered an FIR against singer Kanika Kapoor today (20th March, 2020) under the provisions of Section 269 (Negligent act likely to spread infection of disease dangerous to life) and 270 (Malignant act likely to spread infection of disease dangerous to life) of the Indian Penal Code, 1860 for having allegedly evading the screening at the airport after her return from the United Kingdom. 

It has been reported that before testing positive for the COVID-19 outbreak, she had taken part in multiple parties attended by parliamentarians including Dushyant Singh and Vasundhara Raje. 

A thorough investigation is to take place of the visitors and locations that were attended by Kanika Kapoor. 

The report will be submitted to Uttar Pradesh Home Department. 

Jyoti Narayan, UP Police officer said, "Any person who creates a problem if they are already infected, we can take action as per IPC and Epidemic Act. Lucknow DM and CMO will take the decision." 

The singer also took to Instagram to share the news with her fans. For the past 4 days I have had signs of flu, I got myself tested and it came positive for Covid-19, she wrote.

Furthermore on March 11, 2020, the Cabinet Secretary meeting decided to invoke Section 2 of Epidemic Diseases Act, 1897. 

The Sectionempowers the state governments and union territories to take special measures to formulate regulations for containing the outbreak. 

Power to take special measures and prescribe regulations as to dangerous epidemic disease." 

It reads as : 

(1) When at any time the State Government is satisfied that the State or any part thereof is visited by, or threatened with, an outbreak of any dangerous epidemic disease, the State Government, if it thinks that the ordinary provisions of the law for the time being in force are insufficient for the purpose, may take, or require or empower any person to take, such measures and, by public notice, prescribe such temporary regulations to be observed by the public or by any person or class of persons as it shall deem necessary to prevent the outbreak of such disease or the spread thereof, and may determine in what manner and by whom any expenses incurred (including compensation if any) shall be defrayed.

(2) In particular and without prejudice to the generality of the foregoing provisions, the State Government may take measures and prescribe regulations for

(b) the inspection of persons travelling by railway or otherwise, and the segregation, in hospital, temporary accommodation or otherwise, of persons suspected by the inspecting officer of being infected with any such disease.

Section 269 of the Indian Penal Code, 1860 (IPC) lays down that Whoever unlawfully or negligently does any act which is, and which he knows or has reason to believe to be, likely to spread the infection of any disease dangerous to life, shall be punished with imprisonment of either description for a term which mayextend to six months, or with fine, or with both.

Section 270 of IPC (Malignant act likely to spread infection of disease dangerous to life) states that:

Malignant act likely to spread infection of disease dangerous to life.Whoever malignantly does any act which is, and which he knows or has reason to believe to be, likely to spread the infection of any disease dangerous to life, shall be punished with imprisonment of either description for a term which may extend to two years, or with fine, or with both.

 

Author - Dyuti Pandya 



Share this article:

User Avatar
About:


Leave a feedback about this
TRENDING NEWS

cheque-issued-for-bribe-payment-not-enforceable-under-ni-act-punjab-and-haryana-hc
Trending Judiciary
Cheque issued for bribe payment not enforceable under NI Act: Punjab and Haryana HC [Read Order]

The Punjab and Haryana High Court ruled that bribe payments do not constitute legally enforceable liabilities under the Negotiable Instruments Act, 1881.

24 October, 2024 10:56 AM
pune-porsche-accident-bombay-hc-rejects-anticipatory-bail-over-alleged-evidence-tampering-involving-3-lakh-bribe
Trending Judiciary
Pune Porsche Accident: Bombay HC rejects anticipatory bail over alleged evidence tampering involving ₹3 lakh bribe [Read Order]

Bombay High Court rejects anticipatory bail in Pune Porsche accident case, citing serious evidence tampering and bribery allegations against the accused’s father.

24 October, 2024 11:07 AM

TOP STORIES

sc-dismisses-plea-for-direction-to-set-up-regulatory-board-to-monitor-and-manage-ott-platforms
Trending Judiciary
SC dismisses plea for direction to set up regulatory board to monitor & manage OTT platforms

SC dismisses plea to set up a regulatory board for OTT platforms, stating the issue falls under policy matters, not for the court to intervene.

19 October, 2024 06:22 PM
a-judges-praise-of-politician-may-affect-publics-trust-in-judiciary-sc-judge-b-r-gavai
Trending Judiciary
A judge's praise of politician may affect public's trust in judiciary: SC judge B R Gavai

SC Judge B R Gavai cautions that judges praising politicians and resigning to contest elections may erode public trust and compromise judicial impartiality.

21 October, 2024 01:34 PM
complainant-cant-insist-on-deciding-plea-to-summon-other-accused-before-cross-examination-sc
Trending Judiciary
Complainant can't insist on deciding plea to summon other accused before cross examination: SC [Read Judgment]

SC rules complainant can’t delay cross-examination to summon others as accused; trial court has discretion on timing under Section 319 CrPC.

21 October, 2024 01:36 PM
sc-dismisses-kejriwals-plea-against-summons-in-defamation-case-on-remarks-on-pms-academic-degree
Trending Judiciary
SC dismisses Kejriwal's plea against summons in defamation case on remarks on PM's academic degree

SC dismisses Kejriwal’s plea challenging summons in defamation case over remarks on PM Modi’s degree, upholding Gujarat University’s complaint.

21 October, 2024 05:10 PM

ADVERTISEMENT


Join Group

Signup for Our Newsletter

Get Exclusive access to members only content by email