38.6c New Delhi, India, Tuesday, February 10, 2026
Top Stories Supreme Court
Political NEWS Legislative Corner Celebstreet International Videos
Subscribe Contact Us
close
Crime, Police And Law

Spitting, Smoking in Public Now Punishable Offences in Maharashtra

By Manthan Pandit      02 June, 2020 05:28 PM      0 Comments
Spitting, Smoking in Public Punishable Offences in Maharashtra

Among cities across the country, Mumbai tops the list, with over 37,000 positive cases of COVID-19.

In an endeavor to contain the spread of the destructive novel coronavirus in the state, the Government has chosen to make an exacting move against those seen spitting, smoking, or cleaning their nose out in the open. 

The State Government has given a notice which expresses that guilty parties caught indulging in the aforesaid will face as long as half a year in prison and recurrent wrongdoers can be punished further with two years of imprisonment. 

The state's Public Health Department has conjured arrangements of the Epidemic Disease Act, 1897, and the Indian Penal Code, 1860 to punish the guilty parties starting now and into the foreseeable future.

Maharashtra State Health Minister Rajesh Tope today said that the state government has chosen to boycott utilization, spitting and smoking of tobacco and other tobacco items in broad daylight in the state. 

Violators would need to pay a fine of Rs 1,000 for the primary offense, Rs 3000 for the subsequent offense, and Rs 5,000 for resulting offenses, he said. 

The choice was taken amid fears that spitting out in the open will additionally spread Covid-19 contamination. Since Maharashtra has the most noteworthy number of dynamic coronavirus cases in India, the state government has chosen to authorize exacting enactment against spitting and smoking openly, state's Public Health Minister Rajesh Tope had said.

The Minister had before lamented that notwithstanding individuals being precluded from spitting out in the open, they keep on spitting, clean out their noses, and smoke in broad daylight. 

They will presently pull in fines under existing laws, the minister cautioned.

As indicated by a request gave by the Department of Health and Family Welfare on Friday, biting and spitting tobacco or tobacco made items will be an offense under areas 188, 268, 269 and 270 of the IPC, identifying with defiance, open disturbance, the careless act causing the spread of hazardous illnesses. 

It will draw in a prison term, it said. 

The request additionally said biting and spitting tobacco items was an offense under area 4(2)A of the Karnataka Epidemic Ordinance-2020.

The state government brought up that coronavirus was spreading quickly in the nation and spitting tobacco items openly places can make the malady spread further. 

The request referred to governments in Bihar and Jharkhand making spitting of tobacco at open places an offense under the Epidemic Act.

Aside from this, according to different segments of the Bombay Police Act and the Indian Penal Code (IPC), the discipline will run from a half year to two years of prison or fine, Tope said in the announcement.

Following the Cigarettes and Other Tobacco Products Act (COPTA), 2003, the state has also prohibited smoking and a ban was also imposed on the manufacture, storage, distribution, transport, and sale of tobacco, scented supari in 2013. 

 



Share this article:



Leave a feedback about this
TRENDING NEWS

resignation-on-medical-grounds-attracts-forfeiture-of-pension-service-madras-hc-full-bench
Trending Judiciary
Resignation on Medical Grounds Attracts Forfeiture of Pension Service: Madras HC Full Bench [Read Order]

Madras High Court Full Bench rules resignation on medical grounds leads to forfeiture of past service under Tamil Nadu Pension Rules, 1978.

09 February, 2026 12:16 PM
madras-hc-clarifies-section-37-of-ndps-act-not-applicable-to-acceptance-of-bond-for-appearance
Trending Judiciary
Madras HC Clarifies: Section 37 of NDPS Act Not Applicable to Acceptance of Bond for Appearance [Read Order]

Madras High Court says Section 37 NDPS Act doesn’t apply to acceptance of bond for appearance on summons, as it is distinct from grant of bail.

09 February, 2026 12:20 PM

TOP STORIES

sc-upholds-joint-insolvency-proceedings-against-interlinked-real-estate-companies
Trending Judiciary
SC Upholds Joint Insolvency Proceedings Against Interlinked Real Estate Companies [Read Judgment]

Supreme Court upholds joint insolvency proceedings against interlinked real estate companies, allowing a single IBC petition for linked projects.

04 February, 2026 11:38 AM
sc-holds-courts-can-extend-arbitrators-mandate-even-after-award-is-rendered-clarifies-scope-of-section-29a-of-arbitration-act
Trending Judiciary
SC Holds Courts Can Extend Arbitrator’s Mandate Even After Award Is Rendered, Clarifies Scope of Section 29A of Arbitration Act

Supreme Court rules courts can extend arbitrator’s mandate even after award, clarifying Section 29A of the Arbitration and Conciliation Act.

04 February, 2026 12:53 PM
if-you-cant-follow-our-constitution-leave-india-supreme-court-to-meta-whatsapp-on-privacy-policy
Trending Judiciary
If You Can’t Follow Our Constitution, Leave India: Supreme Court to Meta, WhatsApp on Privacy Policy

Supreme Court warns Meta and WhatsApp to follow India’s Constitution or leave, slams privacy policy and data sharing with Meta companies.

04 February, 2026 01:30 PM
sc-to-rule-on-trump-era-emergency-tariffs-as-broader-us-tariff-landscape-shifts
Trending Judiciary
SC to Rule on Trump-Era Emergency Tariffs as Broader U.S. Tariff Landscape Shifts

Supreme Court to review Trump-era emergency tariffs under IEEPA, a ruling that could reshape U.S. trade policy and impact global markets and importers.

04 February, 2026 01:37 PM

ADVERTISEMENT


Join Group

Signup for Our Newsletter

Get Exclusive access to members only content by email