38.6c New Delhi, India, Monday, February 23, 2026
Top Stories Supreme Court
Political NEWS Legislative Corner Celebstreet International Videos
Subscribe Contact Us
close
Crime, Police And Law

Unfair Imposition Of Service Charge: Eatery Compensates Complainant With Rs 10,000

By LawStreet News Network      12 February, 2019 12:00 AM      0 Comments
Unfair Imposition Of Service Charge: Eatery Compensates Complainant With Rs 10,000

In a recent complaint moved before a District Consumer Disputes Redressal Forum against an eatery for charging service charge of Rs 168, despite relevant rules stating that paying of service charge is not mandatory, it compensated the complainant by paying Rs 10,000.

The complaint was filed by Aashish George alleging that All American Diner had charged Rs 168 as service charge on a bill amount of Rs 2,100, despite rules that exempted customers from paying the tax.

Citing guidelines issued by the Ministry of Consumer Affairs, Food and Public Distribution, the plea alleged that It has been stated that it is not mandatory for consumers to pay service charge charged by restaurants and it is solely on the discretion of consumers whether they want to pay or not.

It was alleged that in spite of complainants repeated requests, the restaurant did not remove or deduct the service charge from the bill, which was charged illegally by them and refused the complainants request upfront, which was legally binding on the restaurant as per guidelines.

Further, it was also alleged that the eatery, while refusing to deduct the service charge, had contended that entry of customers into the restaurant implied consent towards payment of the service charge.

The restaurant stated that charging of service tax is mandatory in the establishment, restaurant or caf and the complainants entry or any customers entry amounts to his implied consent to pay the service charge, read the plea.

The complainant sought compensation of over Rs 50,000 for unfair trade practices, however, following the settlement between the parties an amount of Rs 10,000 was given to the complaint by the eatery towards full and final settlement.



Share this article:

User Avatar
About:


Leave a feedback about this
TRENDING NEWS


TOP STORIES

nobody-should-believe-anybody-before-marriage-sc-cautions-against-pre-marital-physical-relationships
Trending Judiciary
“Nobody Should Believe Anybody Before Marriage”: SC Cautions Against Pre-Marital Physical Relationships

Supreme Court cautions young adults on pre-marital relationships in a bail plea over rape on false promise of marriage; suggests mediation.

17 February, 2026 04:47 PM
allahabad-hc-refers-advocate-for-criminal-contempt-after-alleged-scandalous-remarks-during-bail-hearing
Trending Judiciary
Allahabad HC Refers Advocate for Criminal Contempt After Alleged Scandalous Remarks During Bail Hearing [Read Order]

Allahabad High Court refers advocate for criminal contempt over alleged scandalous remarks during a bail hearing in Uttar Pradesh.

17 February, 2026 05:15 PM
sc-declines-interference-in-case-concerning-tribal-village-entry-bans-on-pastors
Trending Judiciary
SC Declines Interference in Case Concerning Tribal Village Entry Bans on Pastors

Supreme Court refuses to interfere in plea against tribal village entry bans on pastors, asks petitioner to exhaust remedies under PESA Act.

17 February, 2026 05:35 PM
delhi-hc-sets-aside-dismissal-of-copyright-suit-over-local-commissioners-visit-to-additional-premises-expunges-findings-of-collusion-against-counsel
Trending Judiciary
Delhi HC Sets Aside Dismissal Of Copyright Suit Over Local Commissioner’s Visit To Additional Premises; Expunges Findings Of Collusion Against Counsel [Read Judgment]

Delhi High Court sets aside Commercial Court order dismissing copyright suit over Local Commissioner’s visit; expunges collusion findings against counsel.

17 February, 2026 06:53 PM

ADVERTISEMENT


Join Group

Signup for Our Newsletter

Get Exclusive access to members only content by email