38.6c New Delhi, India, Thursday, November 06, 2025
Top Stories Supreme Court
Political NEWS Legislative Corner Celebstreet International Videos
Subscribe Contact Us
close
Crime, Police And Law

Unfair Imposition Of Service Charge: Eatery Compensates Complainant With Rs 10,000

By LawStreet News Network      12 February, 2019 12:00 AM      0 Comments
Unfair Imposition Of Service Charge: Eatery Compensates Complainant With Rs 10,000

In a recent complaint moved before a District Consumer Disputes Redressal Forum against an eatery for charging service charge of Rs 168, despite relevant rules stating that paying of service charge is not mandatory, it compensated the complainant by paying Rs 10,000.

The complaint was filed by Aashish George alleging that All American Diner had charged Rs 168 as service charge on a bill amount of Rs 2,100, despite rules that exempted customers from paying the tax.

Citing guidelines issued by the Ministry of Consumer Affairs, Food and Public Distribution, the plea alleged that It has been stated that it is not mandatory for consumers to pay service charge charged by restaurants and it is solely on the discretion of consumers whether they want to pay or not.

It was alleged that in spite of complainants repeated requests, the restaurant did not remove or deduct the service charge from the bill, which was charged illegally by them and refused the complainants request upfront, which was legally binding on the restaurant as per guidelines.

Further, it was also alleged that the eatery, while refusing to deduct the service charge, had contended that entry of customers into the restaurant implied consent towards payment of the service charge.

The restaurant stated that charging of service tax is mandatory in the establishment, restaurant or caf and the complainants entry or any customers entry amounts to his implied consent to pay the service charge, read the plea.

The complainant sought compensation of over Rs 50,000 for unfair trade practices, however, following the settlement between the parties an amount of Rs 10,000 was given to the complaint by the eatery towards full and final settlement.



Share this article:

User Avatar
About:


Leave a feedback about this
TRENDING NEWS

instigation-for-suicide-need-not-be-compulsive-suggestive-words-enough-to-attract-section-306-ipc
Trending Judiciary
Instigation for Suicide Need Not Be Compulsive; Suggestive Words Enough to Attract Section 306 IPC [Read Order]

Kerala High Court rules that instigation for suicide under Section 306 IPC need not be forceful; even suggestive words implying the consequence can attract liability.

05 November, 2025 04:10 PM
public-ground-cannot-be-reserved-for-any-religion-madras-hc
Trending Judiciary
Public Ground Cannot Be Reserved For Any Religion: Madras HC [Read Order]

Madras HC rules public grounds cannot be reserved for any religion, allowing Annadhanam on village land and holding that law-and-order fears can’t curb fundamental rights.

05 November, 2025 05:10 PM

TOP STORIES

hit-and-run-accident-case-sc-transfers-trial-involving-judicial-officer-from-punjab-to-delhi
Trending Judiciary
Hit-and-run accident case: SC transfers trial involving judicial officer from Punjab to Delhi

SC shifts hit-and-run case involving probationer judicial officer from Punjab to Delhi over alleged bias; orders potential further probe by Delhi Police.

31 October, 2025 11:27 AM
sc-issues-stern-warning-to-state-bar-councils-over-excessive-enrolment-fees-threatens-contempt-action
Trending Judiciary
SC Issues Stern Warning To State Bar Councils Over Excessive Enrolment Fees, Threatens Contempt Action [Read Order]

SC warns State Bar Councils to stop charging over ₹750 enrollment fee or face contempt; directs BCI to issue circular, return applicants’ documents immediately.

31 October, 2025 11:32 AM
lawyers-cant-be-summoned-for-legal-advice-unless-covered-under-exceptions-of-sec-132-bsa-sc
Trending Judiciary
Lawyers can't be summoned for legal advice unless covered under exceptions of Sec 132 BSA: SC

Supreme Court rules lawyers cannot be summoned for legal advice unless exceptions under Sec 132 BSA apply, safeguarding lawyer-client privilege and legal profession autonomy.

31 October, 2025 02:29 PM
conviction-us-138-ni-act-cannot-be-ground-to-stop-pension-madras-high-court
Trending Judiciary
Conviction U/S 138 NI Act Cannot Be Ground To Stop Pension: Madras High Court [Read Order]

Madras HC rules conviction under Section 138 NI Act is not moral turpitude and cannot justify stopping pension of retired employee; directs release of dues.

01 November, 2025 04:08 PM

ADVERTISEMENT


Join Group

Signup for Our Newsletter

Get Exclusive access to members only content by email