38.6c New Delhi, India, Thursday, October 23, 2025
Top Stories Supreme Court
Political NEWS Legislative Corner Celebstreet International Videos
Subscribe Contact Us
close
Crime, Police And Law

Unitech Ex-Promoters Granted Bail in Homebuyer Fraud Case but Remain Jailed for Money Laundering Charges

By Jhanak Sharma      08 June, 2024 01:31 PM      0 Comments
Unitech Ex Promoters Granted Bail in Homebuyer Fraud Case but Remain Jailed for Money Laundering Charges

New Delhi: A court granted bail to former Unitech promoters Sanjay Chandra and Ajay Chandra, who are accused of defrauding home buyers. Additional Sessions Judge Navjeet Budhiraja made the decision, noting the need to balance the seriousness of the charges with the defendants' right to a speedy trial.

The Economic Offences Wing (EOW) of Delhi Police had filed an FIR against the Chandra brothers for cheating, criminal breach of trust, and criminal conspiracy. Despite being granted bail, they will remain jailed due to a separate money laundering case.

In its ruling, the court highlighted that factors such as the nature and severity of the allegations, the financial amount involved, and the number of affected investors play a significant role in bail decisions for economic offences. However, considering the extended period of incarceration and the lengthy trial process due to numerous witnesses, the court emphasized the importance of balancing the "nature and enormity of the offence" with the defendants' right to a speedy trial. The Chandra brothers have been in jail for over six years, and one of the charges, under Section 420 of the Indian Penal Code (cheating and dishonestly inducing delivery of property), carries a maximum sentence of seven years.

The court noted that the prosecution had listed over 240 witnesses, which would prolong the trial given the court's heavy caseload. Furthermore, the evidence against the accused was primarily documentary, and there were no reports of evidence tampering. Given that the defendants had already been granted bail in all FIRs except the Prevention of Money Laundering Act (PMLA) case, the judge concluded that regular bail was justified. ASJ Budhiraja stated, "The nature of the evidence (against them) being documentary in nature and there being no adverse report of the applicants having tampered with the evidence, the fact that in all the FIRs except the Prevention of Money Laundering Act (PMLA) case as informed, the applicants are already on bail, in my confirmed opinion, the case is now made out for grant of regular bail to the applicants."

The court instructed the Chandra brothers to provide bail bonds of 5 lakh each, along with two sureties of the same amount. It also clarified that the order should not be seen as a comment on the merits of the case.

The prosecution opposed the bail, arguing that the Chandras should not receive leniency due to their time in custody. However, defence counsel Vishal Gosain argued that the defendants met the criteria for bail as established by the Supreme Court.

Last November, the Supreme Court had permitted the Chandra brothers to seek regular bail from the appropriate district court. Previously, in March 2021, the Supreme Court had overturned a Chief Metropolitan Magistrate's order granting them bail and directed their surrender to Tihar Jail authorities. Currently, the Chandra brothers are detained in separate jails in Mumbai, as per the Supreme Court's direction.

 



Share this article:

About:

Jhanak is a lawyer by profession and legal journalist by passion. She graduated at the top of her cl...Read more

Follow:
FacebookTwitterLinkedinInstagram


Leave a feedback about this
Related Posts
View All

Tata ties up with Indian armed forces for supplying high-resolution imagery of borders Tata ties up with Indian armed forces for supplying high-resolution imagery of borders

Tata aimed to enhance surveillance capabilities in border areas for the military by establishing a facility to manufacture high-resolution imagery satellites.

Spotify cuts 17% jobs amid rising capital costs Spotify cuts 17% jobs amid rising capital costs

Spotify to cut 1500 employees in third layoff this year. Here's why

ED files charge sheet in probe against Chinese phone maker Vivo ED files charge sheet in probe against Chinese phone maker Vivo

In the latest development in the Vivo money laundering case, ED files its first charge sheet against Chinese smartphone maker vivo-India, among others. The probe agency had alleged violations of FDI norms by Vivo from 2014 to 2018.

FirstCry parent Brainbees moves for IPO, aims for $3.5 billion valuation; Tata and M&M to offload shares FirstCry parent Brainbees moves for IPO, aims for $3.5 billion valuation; Tata and M&M to offload shares

Brainbees Solutions, the parent company of FirstCry, files for an IPO with SEBI, aiming for a valuation of around $3.5-3.75 billion. Key stakeholders including Tata and Mahindra & Mahindra plan to sell their shares, marking a significant move in the e-commerce sector.

TRENDING NEWS


TOP STORIES

father-of-deceased-pilot-in-ahmedabad-crash-moves-sc-for-court-monitored-probe
Trending Judiciary
Father of deceased pilot in Ahmedabad crash moves SC for court monitored probe

91-year-old father of pilot killed in Ahmedabad Air India crash moves SC seeking court-monitored probe into alleged biased and flawed investigation.

17 October, 2025 10:54 AM
child-cant-consent-to-sex-life-imprisonment-upheld-for-sexual-assault-on-minor-girl-madras-hc
Trending Judiciary
Child Can’t Consent to Sex — Life Imprisonment Upheld for Sexual Assault on Minor Girl: Madras HC [Read Judgment]

Madras HC upholds life imprisonment for assault on minor SC girl, reiterating that a child cannot consent to sex; school records key for age proof.

17 October, 2025 11:45 AM
sc-criticizes-casual-declaration-of-witnesses-as-hostile-upholds-conviction-under-sc-st-act
Trending Judiciary
SC Criticizes Casual Declaration of Witnesses as Hostile, Upholds Conviction under SC/ST Act [Read Judgment]

Supreme Court slams casual practice of declaring witnesses hostile; upholds life imprisonment in SC/ST Act case involving rape of minor girl.

17 October, 2025 11:55 AM
delhi-hc-quashes-22-year-old-complaint-against-advocate-reiterates-that-a-lawyers-office-is-not-a-commercial-activity
Trending Judiciary
Delhi HC Quashes 22-Year Old Complaint Against Advocate, Reiterates That A Lawyer’s Office Is Not A Commercial Activity [Read Judgment]

Delhi HC quashes 22-year-old complaint against advocate, rules that a lawyer’s office is not a commercial activity under MDP 2001 and Building Bye-Laws.

17 October, 2025 01:42 PM

ADVERTISEMENT


Join Group

Signup for Our Newsletter

Get Exclusive access to members only content by email