38.6c New Delhi, India, Wednesday, April 24, 2024
Crime, Police And Law

UP Revenue Official Who Was Accused Under Yamuna Expressway Land Scam Released on Bail by Allahabad HC after he filed a Second Bail Application

By VANDANA KOTHARI      23 October, 2020 09:13 PM      0 Comments
UP Revenue Official Who Was Accused Under Yamuna Expressway Land Scam Released on Bail by Allahabad HC after he filed a Second Bail Application

The Yamuna Expressway Land Scam case was claimed to be initiated by the former CEO of the authority along with 20 other persons. It was said that the senior officials of YEIDA (Yamuna Expressway Industrial Development Authority) along with the other officials of different government and private departmentswere involved in the purchase of land for the expressway. 

UP Chief Minister Yogi Adityanath-led state government alleged that PC Gupta in connivance with officials of YEIDA and other employees purchased 57.15 hectares of land in seven villages of Mathura at the cost of Rs 85.49 crore. This land was sold at a very high cost to the authority which resulted in a loss of Rs 126 crore to YEIDA.

In July, the case was taken over by CBI for investigation and later CBI filed a case against former CEO PC Gupta, VS Rathore, inspector in the anti-corruption branch in Ghaziabad, Sunil Dutt, ASI of CBI Academy, Ghaziabad and tehsildar Ranveer Singh, under section 120B (Criminal Conspiracy) of IPC and Section 7 (Offence relating to public servant being bribed), 7A (Taking undue advantage to influence public servant by corrupt or illegal means or by the exercise of personal influence) and 8 (Offence relating to bribing of public servant) of Prevention of Corruption Act. 

Ranveer Singh, UP’s revenue official was enlarged on interim bail which was extended from time to time and lastly due to this pandemic was extended till 1st December 2020. He filed a regular bail u/s 439 of C.r.P.C which was rejected. He then filed a second bail application in Allahabad High Court before the bench of Justice Suneet Kumar. 

On Wednesday, 21st October 2020, Justice Suneet heard the second bail application made by UP’s revenue official in relation to Yamuna Expressway Land Scam. 

Learned Senior Counsel appearing for the applicant (Ranveer Singh) submitted that “changed circumstances for moving the instant bail application is that during the trial the prosecution witnesses of the CBI have been examined, who deposed that he is the Manager of Hotel Kapoor Inn, Delhi, since 1995, in the month of January-February 2019, the CBI raided the hotel and arrested the applicant.”

He further stated that CBI has also recorded the statement of the witness. He said, “It is in the backdrop of the statement of the witness, it is urged that the case of the CBI arresting the applicant at Ghaziabad in a trap case, stands demolished by their own witness.”

He urged that the applicant is innocent and has been falsely implicated in the instant case, hence the applicant is entitled to be enlarged on bail, the applicant having no other reported criminal antecedent.

Shri Gyan Prakash learned A.S.G.I. in rebuttal submitted that the statement of the witness cannot be relied upon. The witness was summoned only to verify the hotel guest register. He further submitted that the witness could not tell the exact date of the CBI raid. 

The court observed that learned A.S.G.I. opposed the prayer for bail but could not dispute the aforesaid facts as argued by the learned counsel for the applicant.

The court while releasing the applicant on bail said “Without expressing any opinion on the merits of the case and considering the nature of accusation and the severity of punishment in case of conviction and the nature of supporting evidence, reasonable apprehension of tampering of the witnesses and prima facie satisfaction of the Court in support of the charge, the applicant is entitled to be released on bail in this case.”



Share this article:



Leave a feedback about this
TRENDING NEWS

denying-child-care-leave-to-working-mothers-of-disabled-children-violated-constitutional-mandate-sc
Trending Judiciary
Denying child care leave to working mothers of disabled children violated constitutional mandate: SC

Supreme Court of India rules denying child care leave for mothers of disabled kids violates constitutional rights.

23 April, 2024 11:15 AM
ignorance-is-not-bliss-okhla-waste-to-energy-plant-needs-to-be-relocated-residents-argue
Trending Environment
Ignorance is not bliss: Okhla Waste to Energy Plant needs to be relocated, residents argue

Questions on the suitability of waste-to-energy plants in Delhi are not new, but the 2,000 tonnes per day Waste to Energy (WTE) plant, situated in the middle of the dense residential areas around Sukhdev Vihar, is not just a major environmental worry but an example of how siting rules can be bent to accommodate a heavily polluting enterprise.

23 April, 2024 12:29 PM

TOP STORIES

pil-filed-by-ashwini-kumar-upadhyay-in-sc-for-yr-bachelor-of-law-degree-after-class
Trending Judiciary
PIL filed by Ashwini Kumar Upadhyay in SC for 3-yr Bachelor of Law degree after Class XII

PIL by Ashwini Kumar in SC seeks to shorten law degree to 3 years post-Class XII, citing current 5-year span as irrational.

18 April, 2024 11:21 AM
centre-sets-up-high-powered-committee-to-suggest-measures-to-end-discrimination-against-queer-community
Trending Executive
Centre sets up high-powered committee to suggest measures to end discrimination against queer community [Read Order]

Centre forms committee to end discrimination against the queer community, chaired by the Cabinet Secretary, following a Supreme Court directive.

18 April, 2024 12:11 PM
after-karnataka-hc-delhi-hc-sets-aside-government-circular-banning-23-ferocious-dog-breeds
Trending Judiciary
After Karnataka HC, Delhi HC sets aside Government circular banning 23 'ferocious' dog breeds [Read Judgement]

After Karnataka High Court, the Delhi High Court has set aside a Government circular banning 23 'ferocious' dog breeds.

18 April, 2024 01:06 PM
for-wrong-decision-of-suicide-by-person-of-frail-mentality-who-is-to-be-blamed-delhi-hc-gives-view
Trending Judiciary
For wrong decision of suicide by person of 'frail mentality', who is to be blamed? Delhi HC gives view [Read Judgment]

If a man of 'frail mentality' takes the wrong decision to commit suicide, who is to be blamed? Delhi High Court gives a prima facie opinion in the matter.

18 April, 2024 03:23 PM

ADVERTISEMENT


Join Group

Signup for Our Newsletter

Get Exclusive access to members only content by email