38.6c New Delhi, India, Sunday, November 09, 2025
Top Stories Supreme Court
Political NEWS Legislative Corner Celebstreet International Videos
Subscribe Contact Us
close
Environment

Pennar river dispute between Tamil Nadu-Karnataka: SC asks Centre to constitute negotiation committee

By LAWSTREET NEWS NETWORK      24 January, 2024 12:58 PM      0 Comments
Pennar river dispute between Tamil Nadu Karnataka SC asks Centre to constitute negotiation committee

NEW DELHI: The Supreme Court has asked the Centre to set up fresh negotiation committee within two weeks to settle Pennar river water sharing dispute between Karnataka and Tamil Nadu.

A bench of Justices Hrishikesh Roy and Prashant Kumar Misra also said that the committe should furnish its report within three months with regard to the outcome of exercise.

Tamil Nadu, however, opposed the request of the Union Ministry of Jal Shakti to reopen negotiations saying it was a waste of time.

On the contrary, Karnataka submitted that that the previous negotiation committee conducted proceedings in an arbitrary manner and hurriedly concluded only after two meetings that dispute cannot be resolved by negotiation.

Karnataka also said, no field visits were conducted by the committee.

Additional Solicitor General Aishwarya Bhati representing the Centre submitted that inter State disputes being a sensitive matter, further negotiation should be permitted.

South Pennar or Ponnaiyar or Pinakini originates in Nandi Hills near Bengaluru and flows into the Bay of Bengal through Tamil Nadu after crossing Karnataka and Andhra Pradesh.

Tamil Nadu has objected to Karnatakas project to build a 0.5 tmcft storage facility along the Markandeya river in Kolar district, which is a tributary of South Pennar in Kolar district. The facility, which is around 80 per cent complete, aims to supply water to Malur, Bangarpet and Kolar and about 48 villages in the adjoining areas.

In November 2019, Tamil Nadu filed an interlocutory application in the Supreme Court for direction to Karnataka to restrain from building a reservoir on Markandeya river alleging that since the river is tributary of Pennaiyar river, any construction of dam by Karnataka would obstruct natural flows to the downstream.

Tamil Nadu also requested the Centre to constitute the Tribunal to resolve sharing of water between Karnataka and Tamil Nadu.

The Centre had earlier told the Supreme Court that it was ready to constitute the Tribunal to resolve it. However, Karnataka pressed for constituting fresh negotiation committee to resolve sharing of water dispute.
 



Share this article:

About:

Explore Comprehensive Legal Reporting with LawStreet Journal: Your Go-To Source for Supreme Court an...Read more

Follow:
TwitterLinkedinInstagram


Leave a feedback about this
Related Posts
View All

Another CBI Officer Investigating Rakesh Asthana Moves SC Against Transfer, Makes Startling Revelations Another CBI Officer Investigating Rakesh Asthana Moves SC Against Transfer, Makes Startling Revelations

After A.K. Bassi, another CBI officer who was investigating corruption allegations against Special Director Rakesh Asthana moved the Supreme Court.

Ayodhya verdict: SC rules in favour of Ram Lalla, Sunni Waqf Board gets alternate land Ayodhya verdict: SC rules in favour of Ram Lalla, Sunni Waqf Board gets alternate land

SC bench led by CJI Ranjan Gogoi has allotted the dispute site to Ram Janmabhoomi Nyas, while directing the government to allot an alternate 5 acre land within Ayodhya to Sunni Waqf Board to build a mosque.

Supreme Court: Money Spent On Judiciary Less Than 1% In All States Except Delhi Supreme Court: Money Spent On Judiciary Less Than 1% In All States Except Delhi

The court guided all states to document their response to the commission's report within four weeks. If any of the states fail to file a response, it will be presumed that they have no objections to the recommendations made by the commission, the court said.

Supreme Court Top Panel Names Chief Justices for Bombay, Orissa and Meghalaya High Courts Supreme Court Top Panel Names Chief Justices for Bombay, Orissa and Meghalaya High Courts

On April 18, 2020, the Supreme Court Collegium recommended new Chief Justices for three High Courts. Justice Dipankar Datta was proposed as Chief Justice of the Bombay High Court, succeeding Justice B.P. Dharmadhikari. Justice Biswanath Somadder was nominated as Chief Justice of Meghalaya High Court, while Justice Mohammad Rafiq was recommended for transfer as Chief Justice of Orissa High Court.

TRENDING NEWS

mere-use-of-word-arbitration-does-not-create-valid-arbitration-agreement-sc
Trending Judiciary
Mere Use of Word “Arbitration” Does Not Create Valid Arbitration Agreement: SC [Read Judgment]

Supreme Court rules that mere use of the word “arbitration” in a contract clause doesn’t constitute a valid arbitration agreement without clear intent.

08 November, 2025 01:14 PM
sc-issues-notice-on-plea-seeking-one-third-reservation-for-women-in-state-bar-councils
Trending Judiciary
SC Issues Notice on Plea Seeking One-Third Reservation for Women in State Bar Councils [Read Order]

Supreme Court issues notice on plea seeking one-third reservation for women in all State Bar Councils to ensure gender equality in legal governance.

08 November, 2025 01:39 PM

TOP STORIES

no-law-student-shall-be-barred-from-exams-or-academic-progression-due-to-attendane-shortage-delhi-hc
Trending Judiciary
No Law Student Shall Be Barred From Exams Or Academic Progression Due To Attendane Shortage: Delhi HC [Read Judgment]

Delhi HC rules no law student can be barred from exams or academic progress for low attendance; directs BCI to rethink attendance norms and strengthen grievance systems.

03 November, 2025 04:03 PM
mere-refusal-to-marry-does-not-constitute-instigation-under-section-306-ipc-supreme-court
Trending Judiciary
Mere Refusal To Marry Does Not Constitute Instigation Under Section 306 IPC: Supreme Court [Read Order]

Mere refusal to marry does not amount to instigation under Section 306 IPC, rules Supreme Court, quashing FIR and holding no abetment in emotional distress cases.

03 November, 2025 04:15 PM
government-cannot-unilaterally-expand-labour-dispute-scope-without-workers-demand-himachal-pradesh-hc
Trending Judiciary
Government cannot unilaterally expand labour dispute scope without workers’ demand: Himachal Pradesh HC [Read Order]

Government cannot suo motu expand labour dispute scope without workers’ demand, rules Himachal Pradesh High Court, holding termination issues need separate notice.

03 November, 2025 04:21 PM
child-welfare-committee-cannot-direct-police-to-register-fir-allahabad-hc
Trending Judiciary
Child Welfare Committee Cannot Direct Police to Register FIR: Allahabad HC [Read Order]

Child Welfare Committees cannot direct police to register FIRs, rules Allahabad High Court, holding their powers are limited to children needing care and protection.

03 November, 2025 04:29 PM

ADVERTISEMENT


Join Group

Signup for Our Newsletter

Get Exclusive access to members only content by email