NEW DELHI: The Supreme Court on Friday questioned the Tamil Nadu Pollution Control Board (TNPCB) for filing a plea after two years to challenge a Madras High Court's order, which quashed a show cause notice against Isha Foundation run by Yoga Guru Jaggi Vasudev for having constructed various buildings between 2006 and 2014.
SC Criticizes TNPCB Over Delayed Plea Against Isha Foundation Construction
A bench of Justices Surya Kant and Justice N Kotiswar Singh observed it looked like a "friendly match" played by bureaucrats wanting the apex court's stamp on the petition's dismissal.
The court told Tamil Nadu Advocate General P S Raman that now that Isha Foundation has since constructed a yoga and meditation centre in Coimbatore district's Velliangiri, the state must ensure that there was environmental compliance.
Supreme Court Directs Tamil Nadu to Ensure Environmental Compliance at Isha Yoga Centre
“What prevented authorities from approaching this court in time? When the State comes belatedly, we become suspicious," the bench observed.
The bench said the board has the right to take action and it must do so but there is one line in which it was told that the sewage plant is not properly functioning and on that the show cause notice is totally misconceived.
The court asked the state government to issue a show cause notice and make sure that sewage plant and all environmental issues are complied with.
"But you cannot be allowed to demolish a construction, raised before their (board’s) eyes, it is not a small hutment. The construction is running into lakhs of square yard," the bench told the state government.
The bench said now that the Yoga institution has been built, the state should ensure essential environmental clearances are complied with.
The AG said when they applied for the permission, it is for the construction which is to be made, in fact when the approval was given in 2012, it was made clear that it will be subjected to getting environmental clearance.
“They said they do not need an environmental clearance," the AG said.
The bench pointed out that the Isha Foundation had told the authorities that it does not need clearance as it is exempted by the central government since it is an institute which fall in the category of college.
“What is your explanation of two years not coming here (to the Supreme Court),” the bench asked the AG, who said the matter kept going between two departments, and when it came to my desk, he cleared it immediately, and that was how the matter reached the apex court.
The bench said now a yoga centre has been constructed, the state government was not saying that the construction is dangerous to human habitation and dangerous to any other thing.
“Your concern must be to ensure all environmental parameters are complied with whether it is a sewage plant, natural light and fresh air, particular greenery. You should go for all those things and raise all those issues; everyone has to comply with,” the bench said.
Senior advocate V Giri, also representing the petitioners, asked the court to hear the matter after a week, on this aspect.
Senior advocate Mukul Rohatgi, representing the Isha Foundation, asked the court to keep the matter after two weeks as there are some festivals, such as Mahashivratri to be observed on February 26 .
“We have municipal approvals, all other approvals, only 20 % is constructed and 80 % is left green. I will produce photographs and it is one of the best yoga and meditation centres in India,” Rohatgi said.
After hearing submissions, the bench agreed to hear the matter after two weeks.
The pollution board had issued a show cause notice against Isha Foundation for carrying out construction at its premises in Velingiri, Coimbatore between between 2006 and 2014 with regard to environmental clearances. Isha Foundation had contended that its yoga centre fell under the category of “education” and as per the Centre’s guidelines, prior clearances were not required for the construction of buildings for educational purposes.
Isha Foundation challenged the notice in the Madras High Court. In December 2022, the High Court quashed the notice taking cognisance of the Centre’s guidelines.
