38.6c New Delhi, India, Tuesday, March 31, 2026
Top Stories Supreme Court
Political NEWS Legislative Corner Celebstreet International Videos
Subscribe Contact Us
close
Executive

Central Information Commission Drops Show Cause Notice, Disposes of Complaint in Aarogya Setu RTI Case

By Dev Kumar Patel      30 November, 2020 05:09 PM      0 Comments
Aarogya Setu Right to Information

A complainant, Saurav Das had filed an RTI Application seeking information from the Central Public Information Officer (CPIO), the National e-Governance Division (NEGD), and the Ministry of Electronics & Information Technology about the process of creation of the Aarogya Setu App and other information relating to it.

The main contention raised by the complainant was that the Central Public Information Officer (CPIO), National e-Governance Division (NEGD), and Ministry of Electronics & Information Technology failed to provide any information asked in the RTI Application.

None of the Central Public Information Officers were able to explain anything as to who created the App, where are the files, and the same is extremely preposterous.

After hearing the complainant, the Commission took cognizance of the complaint u/s 18(f) of the Right to Information Act, 2005 and issued a show-cause notice vide its interim decision to the concerned CPIOs to explain why penalty u/s 20 of the Right to Information Act, 2005 should not be imposed on them for prima facie obstruction of information and providing an evasive reply.

The Central Public Information Officers, National Informatics Centre shall also submit written submissions detailing their role in the creation of the website (https://aarogyasetu.gov.in/) with the domain name gov. in. The Central Public Information Officer and National e-Governance Division shall also explain the delay of about 2 months in replying to the RTI application - the Commission said.

Shri D.K Sagar said in a statement that previously the matter was scattered in different sections but after the Central Information Commissions order, the concerned information was brought together exclusively on one platform and he is now in charge of handling all queries through RTIs on the Aarogya Setu app.

The Central Public Information Officer submitted that this app was built in a record time of fewer than 3 weeks without any cost to Government and was launched on 2nd April 2020. Within 13 days of the launch of the App, it had more than 50 million users which was a world record of the fastest time to reach 50 million users for any mobile app.

Further, on the issue of the right to privacy of users concerned, the Central Public Information Officer added most of the data remains on the mobile phone of the users and gets auto-deleted after 30 days if the person concerned is not COVID-19 positive. Data of only those who are tested positive is pushed to the server, with the objective of alerting people who might have come in Bluetooth contact with those who tested positive. Such data is also deleted after a maximum of 60 days from the date a person recovers. These protocols are clearly defined and available in the public domain.

As the complainant requested to allow him to attend the show cause proceedings as per principles of natural justice Commission relied on the decision of Hon'ble High Court of Delhi in Ankur Mutreja v. Delhi University in LPA 764/2011 and in Anand Bhushan v. R.A. Haritash: ILR (2012) 4 Delhi 657 and mentioned that it was not inclined to allow the applicant to participate in the show cause proceedings as the matter is between the Commission and the respondents.

The Commission accepted the apology of all concerned officers and cautions them to be careful in the future while replying to RTI applications.

The Commission issued an advisory u/s 25(5) of the Right to Information Act, 2005 to the Secretary, Ministry of Electronics and Information Technology to ensure that the Aarogya Setu website is robust and maintained up to date at all times

The show-cause notice proceedings were dropped, and the complaint too was disposed of accordingly.

 



Share this article:



Leave a feedback about this
TRENDING NEWS

wifes-domestic-violence-complaint-filed-after-divorce-petition-amounts-to-fresh-cruelty-condonation-cannot-bar-relief-madras-hc
Trending Judiciary
Wife’s Domestic Violence Complaint Filed After Divorce Petition Amounts to Fresh Cruelty; Condonation Cannot Bar Relief: Madras HC [Read Judgment]

Madras HC grants divorce, holds wife’s post-petition DV complaint amounts to fresh cruelty; condonation cannot bar relief.

30 March, 2026 05:15 PM
daughter-in-law-not-legally-obligated-to-maintain-parents-in-law-allahabad-hc
Trending Judiciary
Daughter-in-Law Not Legally Obligated to Maintain Parents-in-Law: Allahabad HC [Read Order]

Allahabad High Court rules daughter-in-law not liable to maintain parents-in-law under BNSS; moral obligation not legally enforceable.

30 March, 2026 05:49 PM

TOP STORIES

privacy-vs-prohibition-sc-to-examine-legality-of-breathalyser-based-enforcement-in-bihar
Trending Judiciary
Privacy vs Prohibition: SC to Examine Legality of Breathalyser-Based Enforcement in Bihar

Supreme Court to examine legality of breathalyser tests under Bihar Prohibition law, raising key issues on privacy, evidence, and Article 21 rights.

25 March, 2026 06:14 PM
sc-reverses-high-court-acquittal-in-child-rape-case-directs-all-high-courts-to-strictly-follow-ban-on-disclosure-of-victims-identity
Trending Judiciary
SC Reverses High Court Acquittal In Child Rape Case; Directs All High Courts To Strictly Follow Ban On Disclosure Of Victim’s Identity [Read Judgment]

SC restores conviction in child rape case, reverses acquittal, and directs strict compliance with law prohibiting disclosure of victim identity.

26 March, 2026 02:05 PM
allahabad-hc-grants-anticipatory-bail-to-swami-avimukteshwaranand-saraswati-in-pocso-case-rules-section-29-presumption-not-applicable-at-pre-arrest-stage
Trending Judiciary
Allahabad HC Grants Anticipatory Bail to Swami Avimukteshwaranand Saraswati in POCSO Case, Rules Section 29 Presumption Not Applicable at Pre-Arrest Stage [Read Order]

Allahabad High Court grants anticipatory bail to Swami Avimukteshwaranand Saraswati, rules Section 29 POCSO presumption not applicable at pre-arrest stage.

26 March, 2026 02:25 PM
karnataka-hc-quashes-fir-against-sri-sri-ravi-shankar-in-bengaluru-land-encroachment-case
Trending Judiciary
Karnataka HC Quashes FIR Against Sri Sri Ravi Shankar In Bengaluru Land Encroachment Case

Karnataka HC quashes FIR against Sri Sri Ravi Shankar in Bengaluru land encroachment case, holding no direct role and limiting relief to him alone.

26 March, 2026 03:00 PM

ADVERTISEMENT


Join Group

Signup for Our Newsletter

Get Exclusive access to members only content by email