38.6c New Delhi, India, Tuesday, July 23, 2024
Executive

Central Government Rolls Out A Draft Plan For All India Judicial Services

By LawStreet News Network      05 February, 2020 11:02 AM      1 Comments
Central Government Rolls Out A Draft Plan For All India Judicial Services

An outline has been prepared by the Government on February 3, 2020 for conducting a nationwide test called the All India Judicial Services (AIJS) to induct members for lower Judiciary despite apprehension from judicial institutions that the new selection method will dilute the mechanism of appointing Judges for State Judicial Services. This outline prepared by the Government consists of the procedure and progression of the career of those who qualify the AIJS exam to join lower Judiciary. The exam will allow candidates who have a seven-year practice or have taught in a recognized university or college for the same time period to qualify for the exam. The eligibility criterion which has been proposed is that candidates between the ages of 28 to 35 years can appear for the test. This exam is meant to induct district level judges and certain percentage will be reserved for civil judges, who will get an opportunity to improve their career prospects. Although, the responsibility would fall upon respective States and their High Courts to hire civil judges for the subordinate judiciary which can be separated into two parts: civil judge or magistrate and district judges. Any civil judge, who is currently serving can apply for the exam to qualify for the AIJS provided they have served the required number of years. The age restriction shall be relaxed for candidates belonging to Other Backward Classes (OBCs), Scheduled Caste and Tribe (SCs) & (STs) and seats up to 25 per cent will be reserved for them. 

The mechanism which has been proposed by the government is nuanced and would be appropriate to maintain the independence of the judiciary. It will fast track the progression of Judges and provide transparent opportunity to work both at High Court and Federal level. It is promised by the executive that the examination and mechanism are full-proof. The guidance shall be given by a Judge from the Supreme Court-appointed by the Chief Justice of India to provide a suggestion regarding the syllabus and pattern of the examination. Apart from that, there will be members from the High Court, eminent legal academicians and representatives from the Union Public Civil Service Commission (UPSC). 

Last year, the Central Government wrote a letter to the States seeking their views on All India Judicial Services (AIJS) as they wanted an Indian Administrative Service like exam for judicial services as well to be conducted by the Union Public Service Commission (UPSC).

There was a 42nd amendment to the Constitution of India, 1949 in the year 1976 which added Article 312 into the Constitution, which was proposed by the Law Commission of India in 1952. The AIJS entrance exam will be held at the zonal levelsNorth, South, East, West, and Centralso that judges are posted closer to the places they belong to. The second official cited above said two-year training for candidates, who clear the entrance exam, would include language training as well. A judge holding court needs to know the local language because he or she is required to record evidence in the same, a job that cannot be delegated to someone else... said Senior Supreme Court Advocate Vijay Hansaria. Currently, the examination for trial judges is organised by the High Courts of respective States and there is no uniform system for the recruitment of judges in the country.

 

Author: Asif Iqbal



Share this article:

User Avatar
About:


John Doe
Anil Narula May 15, 2021

It is a great blog post.I am always read your blog helpful and informative tips. I like it thanks for sharing this information with us

Leave a feedback about this
TRENDING NEWS

neet-ug-sc-asks-iit-delhi-to-apprise-it-of-correct-answer-of-a-question-where-two-options-are-found-as-correct
Trending Judiciary
NEET-UG: SC asks IIT-Delhi to apprise it of correct answer of a question where two options are found as correct

SC asks IIT-Delhi to determine correct answer for NEET-UG question with two correct options, report due by 12 PM Tuesday; court to hear further on re-test plea.

23 July, 2024 09:26 AM
2021-lakhimpur-kheri-violence-sc-grants-regular-bail-to-ashish-mishra-son-of-ex-union-minister-ajay-mishra
Trending Judiciary
2021 Lakhimpur Kheri violence: SC grants regular bail to Ashish Mishra, son of ex Union Minister Ajay Mishra

SC grants regular bail to Ashish Mishra, son of ex-Union Minister, in the 2021 Lakhimpur Kheri violence case involving the death of eight people.

23 July, 2024 11:02 AM

TOP STORIES

state-govt-has-got-no-power-to-tinker-with-list-of-scheduled-castes-supreme-court
Trending Judiciary
State govt has got no power to tinker with list of Scheduled Castes: Supreme Court [Read Judgement]

The Supreme Court ruled that state governments lack the authority to modify the Scheduled Castes lists, a power reserved exclusively for Parliament under Article 341.

17 July, 2024 09:31 AM
sc-asks-telangana-govt-to-replace-judge-in-commission-of-inquiry-into-power-pact-by-previous-govt
Trending Judiciary
SC asks Telangana govt to replace judge in Commission of Inquiry into power pact by previous govt

SC directs Telangana govt to replace Justice L Narasimha Reddy in Commission of Inquiry probing former CM KCR's alleged power sector irregularities.

17 July, 2024 09:40 AM
centre-notifies-appointments-justice-n-kotiswar-singh-justice-mahadevan-as-sc-judges
Trending Judiciary
Centre notifies appointments Justice N Kotiswar Singh, Justice Mahadevan as SC judges

Centre notifies appointments of Justice N Kotiswar Singh and Justice R Mahadevan as Supreme Court judges, marking the first SC judge from Manipur.

17 July, 2024 09:57 AM
imprisonment-till-rising-of-court-not-proper-sentence-for-serious-offence-of-bigamy-sc
Trending Judiciary
Imprisonment till rising of court not proper sentence for serious offence of bigamy: SC [Read Judgement]

The Supreme Court ruled that “imprisonment till the rising of the court" is not appropriate for bigamy, a serious offence, stressing the need for proportionate punishment.

17 July, 2024 10:00 AM

ADVERTISEMENT


Join Group

Signup for Our Newsletter

Get Exclusive access to members only content by email