38.6c New Delhi, India, Friday, May 15, 2026
Top Stories Supreme Court
Political NEWS Legislative Corner Celebstreet International Videos
Subscribe Contact Us
close
Executive

CAA Notified: Agree to Disagree?

By LawStreet News Network      11 January, 2020 10:01 PM      0 Comments
CAA Notified: Agree to Disagree

Ministry of Home Affairs issued a notification in the Official Gazette on Friday 10th January stating that Citizenship (Amendment) Act, 2019 shall come into force from 10th January 2020. The bill has been cause for much controversy throughout the nation with large number of people protesting for and against it. 

Home Minister Amit Shah said that the Act is meant to give people citizenship rather than taking it away from them. Senior Advocates Harish Salve have also come out and spoken in favour of the Act. 

Salve said the CAA is not violative of Articles 14, 15 and 21 of the Constitution of India. He added that the communities mentioned in the CAA are the minorities of Pakistan, Bangladesh and Afghanistan. The Act is for the religiously persecuted minorities in these countries. 

The peculiarity of the Act is that it nowhere mentions religiously persecuted as being the ground to accept migrants, however this is the whole premise of the legislation. The Act provides citizenship to non-muslim illegal immigrants who entered India before 31st December 2014.

However, witnessing the other side of the coin, the said Act also does not satisfy the test of arbitrariness (Article 14) as provided by the Honble Supreme Court in various cases. There is no rational nexus of the reasonable classification with the legislation. Article 6 and Article 7 of the Constitution of India provide for citizenship for people from Pakistan and therefore it is strange that the legislature embarked on the journey to bring about a new law for something that already exists. 

Author: Nandini Gandhi



Share this article:

User Avatar
About:


Leave a feedback about this
TRENDING NEWS

no-offence-under-sc-st-act-if-alleged-casteist-abuse-occurred-inside-private-house-sc
Trending Judiciary
No Offence Under SC/ST Act If Alleged Casteist Abuse Occurred Inside Private House: SC [Read Judgment]

Supreme Court rules SC/ST Act offence is not made out if alleged casteist abuse occurred inside a private house without public view.

14 May, 2026 03:16 PM
madras-hc-bars-tiruppattur-mla-from-floor-test-over-disputed-one-vote-victory
Trending Judiciary
Madras HC Bars Tiruppattur MLA From Floor Test Over Disputed One-Vote Victory [Read Order]

Madras High Court restrains Tiruppattur MLA from floor test participation over disputed one-vote victory and alleged electoral irregularities.

14 May, 2026 03:24 PM

TOP STORIES

delhi-hc-refers-to-larger-bench-issue-on-stage-of-hearing-accused-under-section-223-bnss-before-cognizance
Trending Judiciary
Delhi HC Refers to Larger Bench Issue on Stage of Hearing Accused Under Section 223 BNSS Before Cognizance [Read Judgment]

Delhi High Court refers to Larger Bench issue on when accused must be heard under Section 223 BNSS before taking cognizance.

09 May, 2026 10:25 AM
hymen-intact-does-not-mean-no-penetration-delhi-high-court-upholds-pocso-conviction-of-tenant-who-raped-six-year-old-girl
Trending Judiciary
‘Hymen Intact Does Not Mean No Penetration’: Delhi High Court Upholds POCSO Conviction of Tenant Who Raped Six-Year-Old Girl [Read Order]

Delhi High Court upheld a tenant’s POCSO conviction for raping a six-year-old girl, holding that an intact hymen does not negate penetration.

09 May, 2026 12:42 PM
consumer-commission-directs-bus-operator-to-pay-50000-compensation-after-barat-reaches-wedding-destination-at-3-am-due-to-breakdown
Trending Judiciary
Consumer Commission Directs Bus Operator to Pay ₹50,000 Compensation After Barat Reaches Wedding Destination at 3 AM Due to Breakdown [Read Order]

Delhi Consumer Commission ordered a bus operator to pay ₹50,000 compensation after a Barat reached the wedding venue at 3 AM due to breakdown.

09 May, 2026 01:56 PM
sabarimala-reference-day-13-can-faith-justify-civil-death-and-genital-cutting-of-children-sc-bench-examines-religions-reach-over-the-body
Trending Judiciary
Sabarimala Reference Day 13: “Can Faith Justify Civil Death and Genital Cutting of Children?”: SC Bench Examines Religion’s Reach Over the Body

SC’s nine-judge bench examined whether religious practices violating dignity, bodily autonomy and conscience can claim protection under Article 26.

09 May, 2026 02:25 PM

ADVERTISEMENT


Join Group

Signup for Our Newsletter

Get Exclusive access to members only content by email